Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: All Wars are Bankers' Wars

Posted 5 years ago on Sept. 27, 2013, 2:30 a.m. EST by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Equishift Recommended Content: All Wars are Bankers' Wars

This may contain the most significant facts behind the struggle. It is definitely top content. Can anyone debunk it?

My dad told me when I was much younger that the one problem is people will never unite. If this video was well understood by most people, I think people would come together.

What if there was an electronic petition to make leaders declare that electronic petitions were just as legit as paper signatures? How many people would have to sign it? What would we do if millions signed it and leaders refused to acknowledge it?

What if 80% of the nation was connected and on call to march against private banking?

Equishift has the power to make this happen, with paper signatures.

Please watch, comment on and evaluate this as it relates to the following (Rating scale is 1-5: 1=Not even close, 5=Totally):

A) Relevance: Federal Reserve

B) Motivational - inspires you to take action

C) Critical - needs immediate attention

Is it also relevant to another subject?

Back One

Back to Start



Read the Rules
[-] 5 points by shadz66 (19985) 5 years ago

'Matt Taibbi on How Wall Street Hedge Funds Are Looting the Pension Funds of Public Workers' :

Great article & interesting video - both mine and your's, lol !! Also fyi, please see :

Appended in antidote to your link - ''A Culture of Peace'', by Dennis Kucinich :

DK starts @ 5m20s and the 'Q&A' after his talk, is rather excellent too. Finally :

fiat lux et fiat pax ...

[-] 1 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 5 years ago

"The central struggle of our existence is the determination of what is true and what is false."

[-] 4 points by shadz66 (19985) 5 years ago

And ''thus spake Zarathrustra'' and Dennis Kucinich too & as per your posted video and this thread :

In his recent address to the UN-GA, Obomber openly embraced an aggressive military doctrine backed by previous administrations on using armed force beyond the international norm of self-defence. Such an aggression was deemed The Supreme War Crime at The Nurnberg Trials ! Obama told the world that the US is prepared to use its military to defend what he called "our core interests" in the Middle East, ie. ... continued U.S. access to oil.

"[Obama] basically came out and said the U.S. is an imperialist nation and we're going to do whatever we need to do to conquer areas to take resources from people around the world," says independent journalist Jeremy Scahill. Also fyi :

fallaces sunt rerum species ...

[-] 1 points by IrishRevolt (5) 5 years ago

No one loves national debt interest from war like banks.

[-] -1 points by RobertHod (1) 5 years ago

Inspired to tell you I cannot view video. Anything that brings 80% together is good, because Americans are basically good, just deceived. They won't gather at that percentage for a deception though unless it is also social, not just political.

That is what party politics does to continue. People almost don't know the difference any longer.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

Deceived by banks, eh?

Which bank owns up to this shit?


I can tell you what parties they are, but what bank?

[-] 1 points by RobertHod (1) 5 years ago

Collusion between gov and church. Basically working to violate the highest principle because of "belief".

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

No, no.

Name the bank.

I have shown this kind of thing to be at least partially attributable to ALEC and libe(R)tarianism.

I wish to know what bank is actively involved.

[-] 1 points by RobertHod (1) 5 years ago

Use a FOIA on Texas state dept edu. Get the publishers names. Buy something from the publisher with a check by mail. When the check comes back, it will say which bank. That's a start.

FDIC will have the connections to other banks.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

I'm not here to prove your statement.

I asked you to do so.

This should be as easy for you as you claim.

Be glad I didn't ask you about what banks are involved in the deception that IS prisonplanet.

[-] 1 points by RobertHod (1) 5 years ago

I'm only helping with your interest, not adopting it.

How interested are you?

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

I was interested in an answer from you that actually supported your statement.

It's you that's not interested in proving it.

You have proven to be bullshit, so I'm no longer interested.

[-] 0 points by RobertHod (1) 5 years ago

You misrepresent. You brought up banks not I. I pointed out devotions genetly associated with our business.

[-] -1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

Oh, then you shouldn't have butted in, to answer for the OP in the first place. The OP IS about banks and that's what the comment I made was directed at.

What business did you say you did that for?


[-] 0 points by IrishRevolt (5) 5 years ago

Butted in? Who hopped on whose comment?


What does this have to do with the blog post?

If you are going to be a moderator, you cant keep hopping around attacking and switching the topics anymore.

You need to be impartial.

[-] -1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

How many are you?

To be impartial, I need to know.

[-] 1 points by IrishRevolt (5) 5 years ago


(impartial doesnt need details to do so)

[-] -1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 5 years ago

Well then, perhaps you can address my original question?

What bank is responsible for this deception.


I never got the impartial answer I was looking for.

I got ad hominem.