Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: After much discussion, it seems as if the Ron Lawl supporters advocate an unregulated "Free Market" solution. A market that places NO restrictions on how corporations conduct business…

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 22, 2011, 4:05 p.m. EST by unarmed (213)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

…A market that ultimately leaves each and every American consumer with the burden of personally researching EVERY item you purchase and bring into your home, insure it works, won't poison you, explode and burn your house down or kill you. And if it does, too bad ALL SALES FINAL.

12 Comments

12 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 12 years ago

Take away the power of the one thousandth of one percent. Take away their unimaginable advantage: the power to create money out of thin air and receive interest payments on the newly created money. Take away fractional reserve banking from privately owned banks.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

And the bestest part is that they also believe that they can drill whatever it is they want to next to your land or house and if the water supply or ground becomes contaminated............oh well.

[-] 1 points by demcapitalist (977) 12 years ago

There's a new report about poison dog food from China today.

[-] 1 points by madfoot (52) 12 years ago

You're right. Wal-Mart really wants to poison me and burn my house down, but it's the government stopping them.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 12 years ago

Lobby your state legislatures to create a State Bank.

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by EXPOSED (222) 12 years ago

I rather the government produces it, buys it and delivers it to me... for free.

[-] 2 points by unarmed (213) 12 years ago

I rather not have to set up an entire product testing and safety facility in my basement, just to make sure the stuff I buy is safe for my family. I think that job is better left to the government.

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by EXPOSED (222) 12 years ago

We're on the same page comrade, the companies chosen by our government are better suited for that job and no bid contracts is our government's way of keeping our food safe. Long live Mosanto!

[-] 2 points by unarmed (213) 12 years ago

Not for the no bid contracts, but I don't want DDT in my spinach either.

[-] 1 points by EXPOSED (222) 12 years ago

Well that's what good government$ do: if company i$ good with government, government i$ good with the company. Competition over contracts would violate that $acred rule...

Unacceptable what that kook wants to do

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

Monsanto paid good money in bribery, all over the place, to get those laws passed.

The funny part is, we paid for it.

Plus all that marketing/PR and lobbying, is a tax deduction we have to make up for.

Get the money out!

OccupyWallstreet!

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 12 years ago

"exposed", do you mean MONINSANITO? :o)