Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: A New Kind of Weapon - Dr. Judy Wood Presents Evidence

Posted 6 years ago on April 12, 2012, 11:44 a.m. EST by Devoghe (40)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Amazing! I love the way this guy speaks. I've watched most of the work of 'BackToConstition' on youtube. This one is especially important.




Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Zinger2020 (5) 5 years ago

I'm very happy to see a link to Dr Wood's work on OWS.

The mainstream "9/11 Truth Movement" is led by shills connected to the development of directed-energy weaponry and their goal is to lead people away from Dr Wood's work. Richard Gage (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) has a long history being employed at Bechtel, a large defense contractor, and I think subsidiary of SAIC. And Steven E Jones (Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice) worked on developing directed-energy weapons including neutrino weaponry at Los Alamos and other places. SAIC is one of the biggest defense contractors on the planet, and they do everything from developing and manufacturing directed-energy weapons, domestic surveillance, DHS training, even cleaning up ground-zero.

Do not ignore Dr Judy Wood's work.

[-] 2 points by imortalpeace (18) 5 years ago

Thank you for this eye-opening information! You brave soul you!

[-] 0 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 5 years ago

nothing reacts with neutrinos

it takes vats of special gas to detect neutrinos

they would not make a viable weapon

[-] 1 points by Zinger2020 (5) 5 years ago

I don't know whether its feasible or not.

The point is, Steven Jones is linked to every major directed-energy weapon research and devepment project; meanwhile, he and his defense-contractor pals are parading around trying to convince the world the WTC was brought down by thermite, or nanothermite, or superthermite.... All of which do not explain the enormous list of anomalies observed at ground zero.

People have to look past the mainstream "9/11 truth" movement and at least look at the verifiable evidence compiled by Dr Wood.

It is all on her website: www.drjudywood.com

[-] 0 points by Zinger2020 (5) 5 years ago

.. Apparently the neutrino tests were done by Fermilab in the US and KEK in Japan. If you want to explore the feasibility or whatever in further detail just Google.

More often than not, what we consider 'impossible' or 'unviable' is often because we're not nuclear physicists at top R&D and defense contractors.

"The importance of neutrino weaponry is immense, because they could potentially destroy nuclear weaponry."

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 5 years ago

looks more like sales pitch than a reality

[-] 1 points by Zinger2020 (5) 5 years ago

Main point: Steven E Jones is one of the most visible 'leaders' of 9/11 truth and has been involved in covering up Cold Fusion energy in the late 80s, has worked on numerous directed-energy projects, and has been leading the mainstream 9/11 truth movement into a ditch, where it will stay for the rest of time, unless people get their heads out of their collective ass, and look at the anomalous evidence themselves.

Debating the viability or perception of information regarding neutrino weaponry is outside the scope of my posts.

[-] 1 points by Zinger2020 (5) 5 years ago

Slight update: I don't mean to spam but this is kind of important... Feel free to flame me if this is not your cup of tea. :)

I should have clicked the video before commenting before...

There seem to be many libertarian alien-conspiracy nutters associating themselves with Dr Woods work. I don't know whether this is on purpose (like the Ron Paul bots spamming everywhere), but its a real shame.

The video posted above for example, is from the stereotypical alien-nut.

It is hugely unfortunate that these people are associating themselves with Dr Wood... It doesn't make sense because she is quite familiar with the scientific discoveries of Nikola Tesla, and is aware that UFO-like things are easily manufactured on Earth.

I'm convinced that these alien-nuts are purposefully associating themselves with the work of Dr Wood to make it all look ridiculous. Guilt by association. If anybody can understand this its OWS.

Its quite frustrating. Im sure its just as frustrating when some undercover joins OWS and starts advocating violence to make everyone look bad.

Anybody interested in her research into the events of 9/11 should avoid alien-nuts.

Having said that, have a nice day and occupy together. You can find her research on her own website: drjudywood.com Free of alien-nuts and libertarian bullshit. :)

[-] 1 points by Revolutionary (311) 6 years ago

I have been trying since yesterday to open the above web site but such web on this form do not usually open/work over here in the Indian Occupied Kashmir.

[-] 2 points by Reneye (118) 6 years ago

Perhaps try her direct website


[-] 1 points by Revolutionary (311) 6 years ago

Ok,Thanks for help.

[-] 1 points by ThomasPotter (4) 6 years ago

The textbook, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph. D., is not about a conspiracy theory or a theory at all. It is a 540 page textbook about factual evidence, empirical evidence that reveals the truth in a way that is undeniable to anyone who reads it. Dr. Wood's textbook has not been refuted by anyone, nor can it be. Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing between the two false choices of "9/11 Truthers" verses "The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory" while ignoring the facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence.

It wasn't poor construction, jet fuel, demolition charges of any type, missiles or planes, mini-nukes, or super-duper-micro-mini-nano-thermite that turned two quarter mile high buildings with a combined weight of over a million tons into microscopic dust particles in mid-air taking less than 10 seconds each. There were over 100 floors in each tower. Try clapping your hands 100 times in 10 seconds.

The truth does not depend on who supports it. Truth is not a club or a matter of “opinion” or "belief". Neither is truth a political or economic objective. Truth doesn’t have sides. The truth is singular and the truth is unifying. By reading Dr. Wood's research and collection of evidence as compiled in her textbook the truth is known, so there is no need to "Re-investigate 9/11". If you want unity, then seek the truth by reading her textbook. If you were assigned to do a book report, would you read the book or rely on rumors, conjecture, and uninformed opinions from other people? This isn't about beliefs, it is about evidence.

Now those that have read her textbook know the truth. Those covering it up should be held accountable. After all, it is the cover up that has enabled what has transpired since 9/11, not what happened on 9/11. So the cover up of 9/11 has been a far worse crime than 9/11 itself. Remember, the truth is known and is knowable. What should be done about those covering it up? Should they face a firing squad or spend life in prison?

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? Hardcover: 540 pages
Publisher: The New Investigation (September 11, 2010) Language: English ISBN-10: 0615412564 ISBN-13: 978-0-615-41256-6 LCCN: 2090916516 Images and Diagrams: over 860 full color Shipping Weight: 3.5 pounds Product Dimensions: 10.25 x 7.25 x 1.4 inches http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

WorldCat Listing http://www.worldcat.org/title/where-did-the-towers-go-evidence-of-directed-free-energy-technology-on-911/oclc/704874500

[-] 2 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 5 years ago

It is a great book.

[-] 0 points by Reneye (118) 6 years ago

Well ThomasPotter.....that is one hell of a post! I can't thank you enough. It takes guts to keep posting in the face of constant adversarial opposition regarding 9/11. How anyone can still look at this and not see what our government did to us is b-e-y-o-n-d me. I think half of the US citizens suffer from something called "Normalcy Bias". Thanks again.

[-] 0 points by Reneye (118) 6 years ago

Thanks! Very Interesting take!