Forum Post: WSJ "survey" of OWS a smear tactic?
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 18, 2011, 8:36 a.m. EST by llf
(144)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
As the movement picks up steam, the attacks are going to increase and more attempts will be made to portray this OWS movement in an unfavorable light to try to scare vulnerable Americans. This is a good example of this technique from today's WSJ.
We need to be smart, we need to be strong, and we need to be strategic. We are the 99%!
I threw up in my mouth a little. What tripe.
Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box."
What happened to Oliver Stone is a good case study. The Wall Street Journal reported that Stone said that “public opinion was focused on the Holocaust because of ‘Jewish domination of the media.’” Stone also said that the Jews “stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f—– up United States foreign policy for years.”
Like so many others before him, Stone groveled: “In trying to make a broader historical point about the range of atrocities the Germans committed against many people, I made a clumsy association about the Holocaust, for which I am sorry and I regret. Jews obviously do not control media or any other industry.”
The late Joe Sobran had this to say about Jewish power:
“Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.”
In 1996, reprinted in the May 27th issue of the New York Times, by Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist describing his feelings on the killings of a hundred civilians in a military skirmish in southern Lebanon. Shavit wrote:
“We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own.”
Peace. Michael Santomauro ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
PS: An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.
If Americans were given a fair representation of what 'radicals' and 'progressives' believe, they might decide to join them. But they'll never get that information from the Wall Street Journal. I'm an FDR 'Second Bill of Rights' Democrat, but that marginalizes me a radical in contemporary political discussions.
Well the "Demands" vote showed that fixing politics has to be the number 1 priority. Without control of laws, anything the banks do can be "legal", however unethical it may be.
I will point out that taking from the country has caused deaths. Whether it is medical care not given, bridges not maintained, taking the country to war for profit, or lack of armor plating for military vehicles when at war, the end result is Americans die needlessly. Considering the stakes, why are we all not as outraged as Dylan Ratigan?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIcqb9hHQ3E&feature=share
this video says it all. the occupy wall street movement has force and passion and is rooted in widespread frustration. however its target - -wall street -- is off the mark. look at this you-tube video to see where the OWS efforts would be more appropriately targeted.