Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Wow, what if this happened to a group of suits, wonder would the driver NOT be arrested!?

Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 4, 2011, 9:27 a.m. EST by unarmed (213)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

20 Comments

20 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

a group of suits wouldn't randomly put dents in other folks' cars

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

1) Car drives up to pedestrian 2) Pedestrians stop, turns, and motions with his arms 3) Driver moves forward and BUMPS pedestrian 4) Pedestrian pounds hood of car 5) Driver revs his engine and guns his car into pedestrian.

If this type of behavior is now considered a legal use of your car, let me know.

[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

i wouldn't idle there and do a reginald denny, for sure.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

"reginald denny", WTF are you talking about, the place was swarming with cops.

So, you are OK with someone ramming a pedestrian that touches the hood of your car, AFTER you bump them with your car?

[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

if he is beating my car up with his fists, and there is a whole crowd of crazy people on the roads together with him blocking other cars, i'm sure as hell going to slam the gas out of there.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

He didn't beat the hood of the car UNTIL the car bumped him. What would you do if a car INTENTIONALLY bumped you as you cross an intersection, apologize to the driver?

This driver deserves to have his ass sued off, as wel as jail time for attempted murder.

[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

if a car bumped me as i crossed the intersection, i am surely NOT supposed to be crossing it.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

WTF, are you brain dead. There is NO intersection in the entire country that a pedestrian does not have the right of way. Did you take drivers ed in middle school?

[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

doesn't mean you walk across it like you own the road.

i don't know where you come from where you can strut around in the middle of the road and expect drivers to go around you.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

You IDIOT pedestrians HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY, means, yes pedestrians OWN the road.

I think for the safety of others you should become aware of the concept, that in this country YOU CAN"T INTENTIONALLY RACE YOUR CAR INTO PEDESTRIANS! No matter how pissed you are. IT ILLEGAL.

[-] 1 points by Daennera (765) from Griffith, IN 13 years ago

How about, yeah you have no common sense. I'm not dumb enough to argue the law with physics. Physics wins no matter what. Don't stand in front of moving cars that you know damn well want to get where they're going.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

You and that nut that pressed on his gas peddle and intentionally rammed his 4500 lb car into a few pedestrians not only lack common sense but you also lack common DECENCY and morals, you don't belong among others, go to hell.

[-] 1 points by Daennera (765) from Griffith, IN 13 years ago

See what happens when you have such a strong entitlement mentality? Roads are for cars. If you don't have the sense of self preservation to not step into a busy street, you get what you deserve.

Reminds me of GA where there are signs everywhere reminding you that pedestrians have the right of way. And believe me they will just step randomly off into a street to cross and not even give a cursory look. I'm from Chicago myself, and do you have ANY idea how many times I almost killed someone pulling that shit? You do that up here and you are roadkill my friend. And really, are you going to argue right of way when you're DEAD? Didn't think so.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

Yabada Yabada yabada… intentionally hitting a pedestrian IS AGAINST THE LAW. A simple yea, your'e right would suffice.

[-] 1 points by technoviking (484) 13 years ago

why don't you try walking in the middle of a busy highway... after all, you own it.

let me know the results.

[-] 1 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

This didn't HAPPEN ON A HIGHWAY…nut.

And even on a Highway YOU CAN'T INTENTIONALLY RUN PEDESTRIANS OVER. It's still against the law. Try it, let me know the results.

[-] 0 points by Socrates469bc (608) from New York, NY 13 years ago

That's Attempted Murder..

[-] 0 points by JenLynn (692) 13 years ago

Or the jury may believe the driver had enough fear of the crowd to get them get away with calling it self defense. You can make it sound good, trapped by a screaming crowd, not allowed to move, people banging on the car, makes a nice story and doubt goes to the accused in criminal matters. Driver will probably loose big in civil court though.

[-] 2 points by unarmed (213) 13 years ago

That non-sense won't fly with cops all over the area. Attempted Murder. And also the drivers actions preceding the incident in no way indicate fear, arrogance yes.

[-] 1 points by JenLynn (692) 13 years ago

You may be right, but strange things happen in trials months and months down the road. People that look guilty at the time get off somehow. There was a mistake made in letting the driver go, or the police had it out for the demonstrators, or there was a reason to feel sympathy for the driver, I wasn't there and no one on a jury will have been there.