Forum Post: Why Government Becomes the Scapegoat
Posted 12 years ago on June 25, 2012, 12:57 p.m. EST by JadedCitizen
(4277)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Conservatives and business like to blame government for most of the problems in society. They must scapegoat government in order to distract public attention from the real causes of many of our social and economic problems.
Why Conservatives Must Scapegoat Government
Ordinary Americans are facing an ever increasing number of financial and economic difficulties: their wages have stagnated, many people have little money for retirement, jobs have been downsized and outsourced, rising costs have put college out of reach for many, the gap between rich and poor has increased, health care costs have continued to rise for millions, and so on. And all of this was before the recent deep recession. The American dream just isn’t what it used to be; and faced with these mounting difficulties and risks, many Americans are anxious and angry. And they are looking for someone to take it out on. But the problem for conservatives is this: the causes of virtually all of the serious problems just mentioned are located in the private sector. The workings of the free market and the decisions of business leaders are largely responsible for low wages, high medical costs, increasing economic inequality, stock market crashes, and so on. These are some of the downsides of a modern capitalist market economy. But of course conservatives cannot admit this. They must find a scapegoat on which to deflect this public anger – and government is the perfect one.
Increasingly, most anti-government activists have embraced a kind of “market fundamentalism.” They have a blind faith in the perfection of the market and a strong belief that if markets are left alone, they will solve most problems and produce the best of all possible worlds. So these people desperately need someone or something else they can blame for the economic problems being experienced by many Americans. They have to blame government, because the alternative – admitting to the imperfections of market capitalism – is unthinkable. That is why they are forced to try to blame virtually all of society’s problems on government – no matter how absurd and how unfounded most of these accusations actually are. This seemingly irrational display on the part of free-market conservatives actually begins to make more sense once we realize that they really have no choice. Once they are committed to believe in the perfection of the market, they must also then believe that the government is the source of our problems. So it is not just that they want to blame government for our problems; they have to blame government, no matter how ridiculous this might be in many cases.
A New Acceptable Form of Scapegoating
Scapegoating is certainly nothing new in American politics. It has been particularly common among extreme right-wing populist groups throughout our history. The Know Nothings of the 19th century heaped blame on Catholics and immigrants for society’s problems. In the twentieth century, the Ku Klux Klan pointed the finger at blacks and Jews. Today, instead of targeting and demonizing a particular religious or ethnic group, the target has often become politicians, bureaucrats, judges and the institutions of government itself.
This new target has a number of advantages for conservatives. First, it plays on traditional American distrust of government and politicians. Second, and more importantly, blaming the government seems to be a more sanitized and acceptable form of scapegoating. Those who do it cannot be charged with being racist or xenophobic. Most people today would not tolerate an effort to make racial or religious groups the scapegoats for society’s problems. But many are willing to stand by as the very same vicious tactic is used against government officials and politicians. This “sanitizing” of scapegoating has allowed it to become more widespread. This is the other thing that is new about this kind of political scapegoating – it has gone mainstream. This tactic is no longer limited to ultra right-wing kooks, but is now used by a major political party and by large numbers of average Americans. Targeting government has become the political witch-hunt that the whole family can enjoy.
Ultimately, however, the biggest problem with scapegoating government is that it makes it much harder to solve our pressing social and economic problems. Whipping up feelings of anger and resentment against the government only encourages irrational thinking and distracts us from understanding the real causes of our problems. As the hatred of government grows, it pushes out reason and common sense. People caught up in these powerful emotions rarely stop to think clearly about whether government is really to blame or to consider alternative causes of our problems.
Full article,,,, http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=22&p=1
Vote for people who think government is broken and let them show that it is. What kind of sense does that make?
About as much sense as sending an arson to put out a fire.
I am so stealing that!
You can have it for a twinkle.
The wealthy will use any propaganda to distract us from the fact that their selfishly greedy fallacious 'business' practices are the problem
Conservatives would collar the blame on puppies and kittens if they thought they could get away with it.
Toward Greater Economic Equality
The first line of attack is to go straight to the heart of the problem: our large inequalities in wealth and income. If these disparities are the basic cause of political inequalities, then these private inequalities need to be lessened if we want to move toward political system where power is more widely dispersed among all citizens. So we need to produce a fairer division of the economic pie that is created by the work of all Americans. However, such changes in the distribution of wealth and income will not come about naturally through the market, but can only be enacted through various kinds of public policies on the state and federal levels. Here are some policies that would help to reduce wage and wealth inequalities.
A more equitable distribution of income and wealth would certainly be a step in the right direction in the effort to remedy the unfair distribution of political power that we have in the U.S. The goal of these policies is not to eliminate economic inequality in America; no one is arguing that everyone should make the same amount of money. The point is to begin to reduce economic inequality to a more reasonable and just level – a level at which it will no longer undermine the promise of political equality.
I am going to guess that you have heard all the right wing talking points on these things.There is not an item on your list that could get out of either house of Congress right now. The problem is that they have a lot more "free speech" than we do. Unlikely that we will get an even playing field without the amendment. A high marginal tax rate solves many of those things. Nice thinking, btw.
An amendment and campaign reforms would be a necessary step to get from here to there. btw, credit to Prof. Douglas J. Amy for the above.
Government is the problem, go attend a small claims court proceedings and see how they align themselves with the rich! or how many bench warrants are issued against the poor who fell victim to the predatory lending practices of "check city", check into cash", or landlords who withold the homes from the poor because they got in early in the pyramid economics and paid as little as 8k for their homes, but continue to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars from the poor who will never own any of america even though their fathers fought to conquer this land!
It is foretold in the scriptures of Jeremiah, that the poor of this land would be ground in the dirt, and the great suffering that awaits these people after they had been blessed so much will be equally just!
I think it should be illegal to rent, that people who are paying for their basic necessity should own that piece of America! Why should our government tolerate oppression of our poor people anymore by favoring a pyramid type financial system, where only a few at the top get rich instead we should make it mandatory that no one can enjoy luxury until all people have their basic needs met.
You bring up a great point. Government is a problem because it infested by people who only hear the voices of the wealthy. But don't confuse the people in government with the institution of government itself. The key is to find a way to get the right people in government. Scapegoating government solves nothing. The truth is that government is the mechanism standing between us and the uber-wealthy. When is the last time you had a democratic workplace.
Laws and the justice system are to protect the rich from the poor.
When they protect the poor from the rich they call them regulations. ;p
The problem with this article is that it ignores the fact the government is full of GOP appointees who have "burrowed in" and been given civil service jobs. These people don't believe that government should solve problems so a) they focus their attention on other things, b) they actively sabotage the government to prove their point and c) since they believe that it is illegitimate, they feel free to steal from it and/or help others steal from it. This was particularly obvious in the Iraq War. The Defense Department is so screwed up, it hasn't produced a set of financial statements for decades. They complain about expensive hammers and toilet seats while $ billions walk out the door unaccounted for, for the reasons cited above.
They didn't believe in it, so they took long term jobs in it. And then they bad mouth it. No hypocrisy here!
Hypocrites extraordinaire.
It's funny how conservatives blame government. When they're 50% of it. It takes a certain amount of self-loathing to be a conservative. Which is associated with sociopathy. Whoops! There's that sociopathy again! But in a sense they're right. They are the problem.
My score: 45 out of 100. This puts you in the category of the low Machs, people who will hold out for the goodness of the world and avoid manipulation. Not the people Machiavelli would approve of.
I think Machiavelli would approve of most high ranking conservatives.
http://personality-testing.info/tests/MACH-IV.php
I never win, I only got a 43, but I'm going to study and try it again later. :)
Lol. Take it easy mister, it's only a couple of points.
LOL :}
That's pretty funny. I'm slightly more Machiavellian than you. I scored 57. But that's still below average. Whew! I almost scared me.
The illuminati won't be seeking you out for recruitment with a 57. You are safe. ;-)
the bullshit starts in sentence one!
FTFY...
Conservatives and business like to blame unnecessary, poorly thought-out, poorly-executed, money-wasting, business-swamping unbelievably stupid and inefficient government programs outside the scope of the Constitution for most of the problems in society."
at least TRY to be honest
Do you jerk off with an invisible hand?
Lol
I'm giving him the invisible finger as we speak.
no, tell me about it. how do you do it?
Use a real hand. There......FTFY
so you're using your real hand now?
TMI, dude
in your case, it's TWI
Thats one of the best things I've ever heard. Staunch supporters of capitalism masturbate with Adam Smith's invisible hand! I'm gonna have to steal that from you. I wonder if they even understood the joke?
My jokes are open source & it would appear the meaning slipped right past them.
By the way what is FTFY?
You have to give me the secret invisible handshake first. Ah, what the hell, since it's you....Fixed That For You.
Ah I see.
I bet old jerko didn't even read past the first line of my post.
Probably not. They aren't here to exchange ideas or have any kind of meaningful debate, which is why I rarely engage them. They aren't going to sway me to their opinion so whats the point. I'm not going to sway them to my opinion either. I've also decided to quit engaging the hardcore democrats. They are damn near just as bad.
I hear you. Life is to short to engage in pointless bickering. If I can't find at least a little bit of common ground with someone else, I don't see much point in wasting my breath on them.
I learn things here
right scapegoat the government
Quit cloning around.
My bad - thought you were a Matt clone.
1 points by MattHolck2 (24) 0 minutes ago
off to the shop to get my computer fixed
off to the shop to get my computer fixed
only if adam smith means anything
Right if they even know who Adam Smith is!
the guy putting chemicals together atom by atom
Your adulation of conservatives and business is somewhat questionable, since neither accomplishes much but to enrich themselves.
The Constitution is a piece of paper like any other piece of paper. If you want to worship it, by all means do so, but don't expect the rest of the world to go along with you.
When you mention all the assinine, money-wasting programs, you forget to mention Santorum's vote on the bridge to nowhere, you omit the top-heavy wasteful war machine, the bloated border patrol, the wasteful intelligence apparatus--the latter three all to defend us from some hobgoblins of the reactionary mind.
I'm all for no vertical government--that means conservative idiots stay out of women's vaginas, people's sexual preferences, their marriage rights, etc, etc, etc. Conservatives want to control other people and make them live by some antiquated standards that have never really worked.
My "adulation?" that's funny. Kook assumptions always are.
"is a piece of paper" very intellectual. Maybe it would have more gravitas with you if it was chiseled on stone tablets. Kook intellect is always funny, too.
"Santorum" - yet another assumption about who I blame and let off the hook. And in a shocking development, the assumption is ... Wrong! In a not so shocking development, the assumption is laughable. Kook 1-dimensional thinking always is.
"conservatives want to control people" -- couldn't agree with you more, especially regarding birth control, marriage, etc. but aren't you forgetting the 1000s of social engineering experiments liberals like to test out on the population? they sure want to control the amount of money they let you keep. they want to control how much sugary drink you can have at once. they want compete control over your healthcare. they want to control who you can hire and fire. they want control over whatever fashionable alteration of history is en vogue. they want to control what you put in your body.
I could go on, but you get the picture. All these things cut both ways. Both parties suck.
Frankly, my slizzo, I don't give a damn. What you do or believe is up to you, just give me the same options.
you, too, can believe what makes you feel better. but don't tell me what I believe or who I support. you can always ask. I don't avoid questions like most of the raging angries here do.
FTFY?