Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Why does OWS delete any mention that Obama is Owned by Goldman Sachs?

Posted 12 years ago on Feb. 28, 2012, 10:01 p.m. EST by egoldman (-5)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Why does OWS delete any mention that Obama is Owned by Goldman Sachs?

Lloyd Blankfein - Goldman Sachs... contributed almost a million dollars to Barack Obama's presidential campaign — making Goldman Sachs "the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008"


Hypocrisy is the first order of OWS.

They complain 24-7 about 'ron paul' a nobody, yet the current USA president was bankrolled by the biggest crooks on earth GoldmanSachs CEO's, just a few months ago Corzine stole $3Billion dollars from US farmers and wired the money to Europe, and he still walks free. [ Because Obama's only purpose is to protect the Financial Mafia that Controls America ]

The endless talk here is that R-Paul had a campaign contributor that sells electronics, ... but nobody is saying that the paymaster of Ron-Paul is the biggest killer and crook on earth like the paymasters of OREO-OBAMA.

So what gives?

If OWS really represents the 99% when in the hell are they going to quit the stupid Hypocrisy?

Since OBAMA has taken office he has KEPT the same money men in power that BUSH had, ... there has been no change, because OBAMA & BUSH are both OWNED by Goldman Sachs.

Why is OWS terrified of the truth? Why must the BOT posters continually distract concerned citizens with trivial bullshit?

Lloyd Craig Blankfein (born September 20, 1954) is an American business executive. He is currently the CEO and Chairman of Goldman Sachs.


Lloyd Blankfein - Goldman Sachs... contributed almost a million dollars to Barack Obama's presidential campaign — making Goldman Sachs "the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008"

What more needs to be said, MORE BUSH than BUSH,

Why did Goldman Sachs invest so much in OBAMA?

Because then the bankers would NOT go to jail.

OWS only exists to keep the bankers out of jail,..

Jesse Jackson said "Obama ain't Black", ...IMHO "OWS ain't LEFT", OWS is owned and ran by the bankers,... with the explicit intention of keeping the masses distracted with BULLSHIT as seen on this forum.


Wow, a president who got bankrolled by rich fat cats. In this day and age? Who would have thought?

Seriously, its about choosing the least of all evils nowadays. Republicans will all shred the working class and hand everything to thier corporate masters, and Dems want to do that, but have to placate the lesser people because thats the only way they win elections. Want to change things? Occupy the DNC. [ NOT true, Democrats represent the SEIU and Van Jones the Prison Unions, the Democratic Party is owned by Public Labor Unions. The DNC was co-opted long ago. ]

The USA needs a viable 3rd party and quick. Otherwise the little guys are all going to be sent to a DNC/RNC public union prison.

111 Comments

111 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by HitGirl (2263) 12 years ago

Since, if that were the case, your post would be deleted, I guess your point is moot.

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

The OP has been deleted and banned. Is that enough?

[-] 2 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Everyone knows this already. The problem is the political process. The Republic has become an Oligarchy. This is obvious.

Citizens United needs to be overturned and we need campaign finance reform. Everyone knows this already. There's not alot of need to discuss the obvious. There's already multiple pieces of legislation for this as a result of Occupy.

http://deutch.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=269672

http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=7AFC6D2C-7C24-4CB6-80C3-74CDF7E383A3

http://sanders.senate.gov/petition/?uid=f1c2660f-54b9-4193-86a4-ec2c39342c6c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXcCqgf6LGM

http://tomudall.senate.gov/?p=blog&id=970

And the state of Montana is challenging Citizens United.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/02/justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg_is_ready_to_speak_out_on_the_danger_of_super_pacs_.html

[-] -1 points by egoldman (-5) 12 years ago

Obama GOT more $$$$ from the EVIL-Bankers than the oligarchs, this makes the DNC-OBAMA a bigger Oligarchy than the RNC.

Still didn't answer my question, of why does the OWS management ( leadership ) always delete this subject?

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Stop making crazy unjustified claims that OWS leadership "always" deletes these topics. You have no basis to make such an accusation.

First of all, there is no OWS leadership or management. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

Second, there are plenty of posts about Wall Street, Goldman Sachs, and government corruption. Just because you're late to the party, don't pretend you know oh so much. You'll sound like a crazy person.

There is a seach feature here ya know. Top right corner of the screen. Just type "Goldman Sachs". Use quotes. You'll find plenty of posts. The search feature searches original posts. Not comments within unfortunately. But, you'll still find plenty of stuff. It loads 50 random posts/search.

Yes, we know - Pres. Obama's biggest contributor is GS. Here. I'll state the obvious again, to prove it won't get deleted.

Pres. Obama's biggest contributor is Goldman Sachs. Pres. Obama has chosen not to use the power of his Justice Dept. to investigate/prosecute Wall Street at the Federal level. It appears that Pres. Obama made this decision (in whole or part) based on the fact that GS is his biggest campaign contributor.

However, the FHFA filed suit against the biggest banks, including GS six months ago, on behalf of Fannie and Freddie.

Pres. Obama recently created the Mortgage Fraud Task Force, co chaired by Eric Schneiderman.

http://act.credoaction.com/pages/sotu_2012/

Yes, Pres. Obama is part of the oligarchy. So is everyone else in government.

Does that answer your question?

How come you talk like a crazy person? Are you mentally ill?

[-] 0 points by B76RT (-357) 12 years ago

Because ,.........it doesnt fit into their template.

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

bozocountdown321 No Profile Information

Private Messages

send message

Information

Joined Feb. 27, 2012

[-] 1 points by nobnot (529) from Kapaa, HI 12 years ago

The only party we need is the after party.And you are not invited.

[-] 1 points by Progression (143) 12 years ago

You realize corporations like Goldman Sachs hedge their risk by donating to many candidates right? http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000085&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=2008

Even McCain got a slice of the pie in the form of a quarter million dollars. Obama in the pockets of Goldman Sachs? Nothing more than the dribble of GOP moonbats. See article: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-04-22/obama-doesn-t-intend-to-give-back-1-million-in-goldman-campaign-donations.html

Goldman Sachs made a mistake in investment that won't be returned. I'm sure many of these corrupt banks regret putting money on Obama and won't do so again.

See Goldman Sach's increasing contributions to the GOP after 2008:

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000085&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=2010

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000085&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=2012

[-] 0 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

GS gave OBAMA more money than anyone else. Obamas principle sponsor for his prez bid was from GS.

Your talking shit and saying the standard crap, "Everybody else is an asshole, ..."

NOPE, Obama is the biggest asshole in the biz, he took the MOST money from Goldman Sachs.

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 12 years ago

Posts (including OP's) can be deleted by their creator ... it happens.

[-] 1 points by Coldinflorida (50) 12 years ago

i see this post... so we havent got to everything...

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

Goldman sach is contributing to mitt romney's campain also. Im not sure that mitt romney represents me though, when he said "we need to get the prices of homes back up" what? so who can pay for them, poor american families in a safety net? I just bought a foreclosure last year, and im thinking i cant afford it, i might sell it and move into a trailer, so who the hell is this candidate representing? Not me. And as for the rest of you scum that forced the price of homes up beyond what americans can afford, yes i blame the seller, not the buyer. You deserve to lose your homes.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Wasn't it the banks that forced the price of homes up by offering sub prime loans? They let so many buyers into the market who shouldn't have been there, that the prices were driven way up.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

i disagree with "letting buyers into the market that shouldnt have been there". we the people were given this land in its original treaty formed by the colonys and in that treaty it specifically states that the government cannot own the land cause it belongs to the people. Yet if any person goes to any land under "management" of they bureau of land management, to try and live there, he cannot.. and now we will say, that they shouldnt be home owners because they dont make enough money to afford a home? Have you looked at the percentage of the mortgage payments that americans pay for a home? 80% goes towards interest to rich bankers. Its all stacked in favor against working americans. I say if they are working americans they should be able to own land and a home, this is how brainwashing has diluted the real problem in america. One might ask why so much land is owned by one person as I see it when I drive around and see large unoccupied and undeveloped land nearly every direction.

Like Thomas Jefferson said, "when government align themselves with the elitists bankers, and corporations, the children will one day wake up homeless on the land their fathers conquered."

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

I think working people should be able to own homes too, but the income of working people is not what it used to be. When we had a manufacturing base here, many people without college educations were able to own homes.

[-] 0 points by SteveKJR (-497) 12 years ago

Just out of curosity not to be personal or pry into your personal affairs, but what did you pay for your "foreclosure"?

I have been living in the same house I bought for the last 12 years and paid $144,000. Just did a 3.85 refi 30 years and brought my payments down to 685 mo.

I can now put more money in the bank, and add more to my wifes 401K.

Now, if I or my wife is without a job tomorrow, we can still afford the monthly payments - we have no car payments - own all 3 vehicles and they are all in great shape along with one Harley Davidson Sportster.

So, if prices on realestate does go up, I will benefit from it.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

well i am for the price of homes going down, so that the next family doesnt suffer under the rule of the elite bankers. and im for people paying off their home mortgage early so that familes havem more money to save for themselves, and their children, which is easier to achieve when our land and homes are lower priced. Why should someone get rich off the backs of the next poor family that just needed a place to live? This is a pyramid scheme and like all pyramid schemes eventually fall. I hope the homes drop another 60k in value.

I paid $136k plus 6k in closing cost for a total of $142k for my home, it had depreciated $63k from the previous owner.

Another benefit to having lower priced homes is that there is less taxes the government takes away from we the people. They are fat cats, addicted to spending, and its time to put them on a diet.

[-] 0 points by SteveKJR (-497) 12 years ago

You see, when you bought your home regardless of what the price was, you were responsible in making sure that you could pay it off - and I will guarentee you that should you lose your job tomorrow, you will still be able to make the monthly payments.

Lots of people didn't do this - they instead bought $300,000 homes they couldn't afford should they get laid off.

When I bought my home I looked at it from that perspective - most people don't because they want to have it all now - and it doesn't work that way.

It takes time to build wealth.

As far as someone getting rich of the backs of the next poor family that just needed a place to live - there are programs out there for them to purchase houses and that is one reason the housing market is where it is.

They did buy houses but weren't concerned about the practicality of being financially responsible. The idea of owning a home was the only vision they had. We bought our first home when I was 45 - not when I was 25 like most people think they should be able to do.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by economicallydiscardedcitizen (761) 12 years ago

I'm surprised the New York OWS folks haven't mobilized behind a slogan such as 'We Have Standards' with a list of demands among them that cities must have HUD compliant housing designed and reserved for the same percentage of minimum wage to those just below the average income per person for the specific geographic area and that the housing available not to exceed more than 35% of the income earner's salary including insurance, utility, water and garbage costs.

So many face the difficulty of income earnings that are incompatible with local costs especially in expensive areas such as New York and San Francisco such that a basic such as housing is not readily available. Others complain too that workers such as Firefighters and Police earning 6 figure income are paid too much when, according to a few 'old timers' over the age of 80 say that in the old days neighborhoods 'fit' the income demographic more closely and that if our city planners went back to planning focusing on the income groups we would not see as much hardship and reliance on public and private subsidy programs among those earning below the income averages or a need to pay city and government employees such as Firefighters and Police as high as they are for their geographic area.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

the problem with government is, they are not the solution to the problem, they are the problem.

[-] 1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

OWS consensus tells us that big government and Obama 2012 is the solution to all the world's problems, ... in fact any opinion otherwise and your not part of the coveted extra special 99%.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23827) 12 years ago

Where does OWS ever say it supports Obama?

And, until Citizens United is overturned, any politician that wants to keep his job will be bought by the wealthy and corporations.

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Lol OWS doesn't have to. Obama pulls the strings through flunkies in the upper echelons.

[-] -1 points by beautifulworld (23827) 12 years ago

Does not.

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Of course he doesn't

[-] 0 points by LadyQ (2) 12 years ago

Freeblogger.co does not delete, please check it out guys you'll like the flow of conversations.

[-] 0 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

We delete it because it is not of any importance.Why do you care what OWS does? Better try to catch a rush show before he gets dumped.

[-] 1 points by HoarFriday (27) 12 years ago

It's good to know that any politicians accepting large sums of money is not of any importance to you speaking, apparently, for OWS.

[-] 1 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

I speak only for myself.But while you speak for everybody scab.

[-] 1 points by HoarFriday (27) 12 years ago

Come here and watch me donkey punch your gerbil jewels.

"[-] 0 points by freehorseman (85) from Miles City, Mt 23 hours ago

We (emphasis on WE) delete it because it is not of any importance.Why do you care what OWS does? Better try to catch a rush show before he gets dumped. ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink"

[-] 1 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

You are a sad person and not much of one either.That is why you are a natural SCAB.Now go catch your fat mentor before he gets dumped.

[-] 1 points by HoarFriday (27) 12 years ago

You gawddam heathen infidel republican. String this one up!

[-] 1 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

Big temper little Man.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

campaign finance reform is one of the most popular issues here

Campaign Finance Reform

[-] 1 points by HoarFriday (27) 12 years ago

Well it certainly should be reformed for republicans.

Let's leave things be for Democrats. They are of the highest integrity and honor, unable to be bought or sold.

I've heard that Democrats give most of their campaign donations, bribes and graft to their constituents, and sometimes not just the ones in their bloodlines!

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

I move for a legitimate voting system over the internet

so people can vote on issues more than every two years

that would keep eliminate the corruption of representatives

as the entire population cannot be bribed

[-] 1 points by HoarFriday (27) 12 years ago

Sounds good, that way if the super wealthy want to buy laws, they'll have to bribe and buy lots of people. That will be better than them buying just a tiny handful like they have been doing for years.

Paypal me lots of money and I'll vote for it, I promise.

[-] 0 points by B76RT (-357) 12 years ago

Because,.......................it doesn't fit the public ows template. it isnt Occupy Wall Street, it's One World Society.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by economicallydiscardedcitizen (761) 12 years ago

Burp...Please excuse the sudden eructation. Anyway, hadn't noticed this info being deleted. Try cutting and pasting posts into email that you can check back on or, you can wait for all posts for the month to load then hit 'select all' copy, then cut and paste to an email so you can easily select your posts of interest.

PS:Much of what has corrupted the true definition of the Dems and Reps. is why I am not affiliated with any party. I think the only votes that have a marginal effect are my local votes and for this reason I vote in all elections except the primaries.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

More importantly. Why, if what the op say is true, is this thread still here?

Could it be the OP was lying in the first place?

I fear it is so.

[-] 0 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

Why was the OP banned the instant he posted this POST?

The standard operation on OWS is to ban a poster and have the BOT's destroy him. He's banned so he can't reply.

It's their game. A very boring game.

The original post on this subject was by salinsky asking how OWS could support Obama given that he got more from the 1% than anyone else? To which the post was deleted and salinsky was shadow-banned ( ows death penalty for non-believers that Obama is god ).

This post by egoldman, to which egoldmans account was shadow banned when this POST was made, so that person could not respond to the comments. ( egoldman as in Emma Goldman the mother of anarchism )

Why does OWS fear a fair debate with REAL ANARCHISTS?

[Removed]

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by ironboltbruce (371) from Miami, FL 12 years ago

Does your trailer park put up decorations for you and your narrow-eyed, green-teethed, idiot kids at Christmas? Or do you just light up some of your empty Jim Beam bottles with the candles your old lady broke using them as dildos to make up for your shortcomings?

[-] 0 points by GildasSapiens (266) 12 years ago

This Post has not been deleted, therefore its premise is false.

[-] 6 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I think egoldman is a visitor from Goldman Sachs. That should tell us something about who they don't want to see reelected.

[-] -1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

I think gypsy king and thrassy and jart are the same person, and long ago thrassy even admitted such,

But who cares what I think,

Emma Goldman (egoldman) is the mother of anarchism, OWS likes to play anarchism, but the fact is they're on the GoldmanSachs/Soros payroll and that makes them imperialist assholes, hardly anarchists.

Soros is a billionaire one of the richest men in the world, and paid for CANVAS and hired Kalle Lasn ( owner of OWS and this website ) to manage it, and CANVAS was used by the CIA to engineer every 'arab spring' on the planet, and they also are running this OP on US soil, its called OWS.

Now tell me about who is the 1%, and who is the 99% ?? I really want to know.

The OWS is a honey-pot, why else would they have youtube on page one, so that google can collect everyone's personal information? Why else would so many fake poster's be asking ignorant people to click on honey-pots? That was thrassy's game months ago to get people to click on FBI honey-pots by using fake 'like/dislike' links. Thrassy was the admin, and admitted so, and admitted working with Jart, and admitted being the same person.

[-] 2 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Yesssss. It's the FBI honey-pot here. You figured it all out. Thras and jart are the same person. Deep psyops for sure. Thras flies the black helicopter. You see the black helicopters dont'cha? And your mailman - he's COINTEL PRO OPS. Notice how he comes to your house everyday?? You might not see him since you're hiding in your basement from those black helicopters. But you know he's there...... Keep up that severe paranoia. Stay in your basement. Don't go outside.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thanks newweiner, I got a bigger laugh out of this than anything I've seen in a very long time! Got your eye on any new nations, or entire populations, to screw with that non-free-market-voodoo-you-do?

[-] -1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

Given what OWS has accomplished, I think we can all agree that OWS has gotten way more than $1 Million dollars from Goldman Sachs.

With OWS the bankers going to jail isn't even on the table, instead its "we are the 99%", or its "save the whales", or "Take the money out of politics"

Think about it this way, had OWS focussed on the 1% for real, and made 'bankers go to jail' the #1 goal, the entire Wall Street would have panicked, instead OWS is seen as nothing more than a BAD JOKE.

This is really sad, but from day-one with the free gourmet food, and the OWS leaders staying in $750/night rooms the OWS had clearly been co-opted by the Wall Street Bankers early on.

Given that OWS has kept the likes of Dimon, Corzine, and Blankfein out of jail, I would dare say that OWS should be paid 100's of millions of dollars for services rendered to the 1%.

They have successfully caused 'protest fatigue' nationwide, they have made liberals into pro-war Israeli firster's, and they have made it illegal to admit that Obama is a Goldman Sachs whore.

I would say that Wall Street owes OWS a billion dollars or more....

Kall Lasn is going to be a very rich man.

Soros got rich as an investment banker, the very thing OWS condemns, ... funny that OWS is financed by the 1%, ... sort of like the fox guarding the hen house?

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Listen up Bozo-Brains!

When the Koch Bros, Wall Street and hedge fund firms stop contributing to the Republicans, then Pres. Obama can stop taking contributions from Goldman Sachs and hedge fund firms too.

Can you say "bi-lateral disarmament"?

[-] 1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

Thank you april, and please don't tell the OWS lemming's that OBAMA took more money from Goldman Sachs than anyone else in the world, ... nobody needs to know this.

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Are you insane or just completely stupid? Everyone already knows this. It's common freaking knowledge.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thank you April. They really like to try to turn reality on it's head, don't they?

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

lertist? Who's the idiot? You cannot even spell or write properly. lol.

Socialist/communist world domination game? Are you a NWO conspiracy theorist? Most conspiracy theorists are mentally ill. Are you mentally ill? There's help for that. Drugs and other treatments.

You can continue being a useful idiot for the Republicans. And government corruption in general. But get some help for your mental illness.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Bozo-Brains, you've already linked that article. I've seen it. I've responded to it. Try to focus.

I know the voices in your head make it difficult. I know you need medications. But until you get the proper psychiatric help, you'll just have to try extra hard to think straight.

Yesssssss.... we know .... it's all because of the "Internationale Movement". Right......

Everything is going to be ok. Try to stay calm and don't be afraid. You will be helped. They come with straight jackets when you really go off the the mentally ill cliff.

[Removed]

[-] 3 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

okee dokee crazy Bozo-Brain person. Do what you gottta do.

Until they come with the straight jacket.

When they come for you, don't forget to tell them all about the "Internationale Movement", and the communist take over of the world.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

bozo, listen, I'm trying to help you. When everyone you know treats you this way, maybe it's "you". You have to consider this possibility in order to get the help you need. It's ok. It's not your fault if you're mentally unstable. It's nothing to be ashamed of.

Do you have any family or close friends that you can talk to about this? Have they ever suggested that you get a psychiatric evaluation?

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Have you been fired from a job because of your mental illness before? Has employer tried to fire you for that? I don't think that's legal.

Do people ostracize you because you're mentally unstable? That's cruel. I can understand why you're upset by that.

Please get some psychiatric help. It doesn't need to be this way. There's help for people like you. Don't be afraid. They don't do shock treatment or lobotomies anymore. I'm sure prescription medication could help you.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

bozocountdown321 No Profile Information

Private Messages

send message

Information

Joined Feb. 27, 2012

[Removed]

[-] 3 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

I recommend you seek help in a mental health facility. There is help out there for people like you. Don't try to fight it. Please seek some help. With the right treatment, those voices in your head will go away.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

You don't need to keep your mouth shut. Just try to make some sane logical sense and you'll be fine. Don't act like a crazy person and you won't be treated like a crazy person.

Try to keep it together. It will keep you out of those mental health facilities. Take your meds as directed.

I hope you don't need shock treatment or a lobotomy. I don't think they do those things anymore. That's what your meds are for.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

Who me? bats eye lashes

[-] -1 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Because OWS is in Obama's pocket. Don't you remember him talking about wanting to create a public military force as strong as our armed force that would be under HIS control? OWS is the beginning of Obama's draft,take it to the bank.

[-] 1 points by nweiner (-9) 12 years ago

OWS & OCCUPY ... same-same and NOT different.

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Obama's first wave of brown shirts.

[-] 0 points by jcorzine (0) 12 years ago

Obama was put into power by Goldman Sachs because they needed blackman to justify the draft and send people of color to die in OIL wars.

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

http://occupywallst.org/forum/judge-in-goldman-case-has-account-at-goldman/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/on-mainstream-media-geithner-is-a-criminal-so-how-/

anyone mentioning ANY bi-party hate spewing or even stroking one side or the other, should be banned from this forum

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

Says the PretendHitGirl

[+] -4 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

Go support Obama's jock you left wing brainless hater. When you get done with that, chug your Soros/Koch shake like a good commie should.

[-] -2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

La la la........you are going to be standing in the unemployment line.

[+] -4 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

Never have, never will. I take care of my own and don't need you or any of your "never enough" amount of government to do a damned thing for me.

I'm very well aware you are without adequate faculties or abilities to comprehend such self-sufficiency.

You will be branded and weaned, if not merely disposed of.........

[-] 2 points by HitGirl (2263) 12 years ago

"Disposed of"? Really, PretendHitGirl? That doesn't sound fascist of you at all. So, you'll dispose of the inferior ones so you can go on to have your master race? Is that the plan, PretendHitGirl? And old people aren't worth anything either, right, PretendHitGirl? So you'll probably be wanting to do away with Social Security. I think I have adequate faculties and abilities to comprehend a Nazzi when I here one. I certainly have your number, don't I, PretendHitGirl?

[-] -2 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

You mean Nazi?

Look at YOUR name and your demands that somebody pay to keep your commie welfare ass from getting pregnant!

[-] 1 points by HitGirl (2263) 12 years ago

My name comes from a movie. Your name comes from mine. What might I extrapolate from that?

[-] -1 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

I'm for real.

Later phoney.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

Really??

Then why are you pretending?

What else are you pretending to be?

Honest?

[-] -2 points by NorthernHick (-31) 12 years ago

Commando Odumbo

We can take Unemployment from 6 % to 9%...Yes we can

We can take gasoline from $1.80 to $3.50/gal…..Yes we can

We can increase the national debt by $ 5 Trillion in 3 years…...Yes we can

We can get more people on welfare & food stamps…Yes we can

We can double the number of homes in foreclosure…Yes we can

We can eliminate 2 Million jobs from this country…Yes we can

We can give away $ 500 Million to Solyndra…..Yes we can

We can fly all over the country Campaigning on Air Force One…Yes we can

We can visit all 57states….Yes we can

We can down grade the US credit rating for the first time in history…Yes we can

We can increase the cost of heating oil to over $ 3.00 a gallon…Yes we can

We can decrease the sales of homes to its lowest level in 20 years.....yes we can

We can play the race card any time we want…Yes we can

We can run this economy without a budget...Yes we can

We can pass laws without Congress…Yes we can

We can create a health care bill that nobody wants…..Yes we can

We can cut our Military leaving the country weak…Yes we can

We can sit idly by while Iran builds nuclear weapons…Yes we can

We can discourage any drilling for oil in the US….Yes we can

We can go to Hawaii anytime we want For Free…..Yes we can

We can run semi-automatic weapons to Mexican Cartels in an attempt to circumvent the 2nd Amendment...Yes we can

We can quit smoking cigarettes…ooops….No we can’t

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 12 years ago

Bush did a lot of those things also. Go back to hating now like a good little troll.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

This means though, that both of them were wrong. That is because they both were working for Wall Street. Don't get me wrong, I had high hopes for Obama in the beginning. With his popularity, he could have really accomplished something.

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 12 years ago

No! I voted for him, so he can't have done anything wrong!

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Oh, well if you put it that way.

But seriously, aren't you concerned that the economy is not getting better, and that he may get us into a war with Iran, which has the potential to become a global nuclear war, since it would also involve Russia and China?

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 12 years ago

I don't know about all of that stuff. I just trust what he says because he gives one sock blaster of a speech.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Juan, my man, you can't be meaning it like that!

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 12 years ago

You have 666 points! I will ignore you now!

[-] -1 points by skylar (-441) 12 years ago

he reads from two teleprompters,.........even when speaking to school kids. off the prompter,..........he cant put two words together.

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 12 years ago

So what?? You're a racist.

[-] 0 points by skylar (-441) 12 years ago

0bama is a mulatto,...half white , half black.

[-] -3 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

Go away, Zenfag.

[-] -3 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

I pretend to lead the club that tries to pretend you, your hor wife and horfriday have any sense or usefulness.

[-] 3 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

You don't sound much like a girl or a hit.I would think short fat and bald.I would not leave my children anywhere near you.Nor any domesticated animals.

[-] -3 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

I ate your children. They tasted like chicken.

[-] 1 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

At there age they should taste like very old chickens,great reply!

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

Just so's you know. you're not doing a very good job.

Your performance to quota is down over 30% this quarter.

You're fired.

[+] -4 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 12 years ago

To convince people you folks have any usefulness would be beyond the abilities of Goldman's, AIG's and even Obama's PR people.

[-] -1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

You will be soon. :D

Sta-a-a-a-a-anding on the corner waiting on the bus

[Removed]

[-] -2 points by egoldman (-5) 12 years ago

The USA needs a viable 3rd party and quick. Otherwise the little guys are all going to be sent to a DNC/RNC public union prison.

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 12 years ago

Yes indeed. Let's get going. There's lots of work to do.

http://www.justicepartyusa.net/

[-] -3 points by egoldman (-5) 12 years ago

Goldman Sachs "the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008"

Lloyd Blankfein - Goldman Sachs... contributed almost a million dollars to Barack Obama's presidential campaign — making Goldman Sachs "the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008"

WHY?

So that NO banker would ever go to prison.

Mission Accomplished, under OBAMA no banker has ever gone to prison.

OWS is ran by and financed by Goldman Sachs, just like Obama.