Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Why aren't the OWS moderated against this Left Wing Garbage?

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 4, 2011, 2:31 a.m. EST by theaveng (602)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

It's not called censorship, it's called disinfectant. We know that the Democrats are controlled by the same puppet masters as the republicans. The Republicans are corporatist..... and so too are the Democrats.

(Just providing some balance against the other post.)

21 Comments

21 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by nucleus (3291) 12 years ago

When applied to the "left" it is disinfectant. It's only censorship when it is applied to the "right".

TROLL

[-] 2 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

umm, let me see . . .

maybe because banking legislation and reform is a leftist idea?

[-] 0 points by tomcat68 (298) 12 years ago

no, it was actually a republican idea. the lefty criminal democrats shot it down.

watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ohyu7-b7F8

this is THE video Democrats do NOT want you to see.

[-] 1 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

yeah-ya I don't youtube

but I'm pretty sure Sanders was out in front on banking reform.

[-] 2 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

Moderating garbage is what papers, television news agencies, Government and radio personalities do. Are you not sick of ideologically blind moderators? I'd hate to see a gate keeper mentality infect the intertubes.

[-] 2 points by JadedGem (895) 12 years ago

I'm actually a fan of balance. I've been wonder where the real people are with the representatives from both sides acting as if people in each party are Democrat all the way or Republican all the way with no compromises possible on anything. They say vote democrat, I say give me a democrat that is PRO GUNS or I just wasted a vote in the south! Get real, can't even give over guns to win some goodwill? Hell, the constitution actually should have protected the people's right to TANKS if that's what it would take. lol Do they give me an option I can show to my Christian republican neighbors? Nope!

[-] 2 points by MaryS (529) 12 years ago

It's kind of wearisome to hear people constantly trying to "equalize" the two parties when things are just a little more complex than that. Is there some psychological gain, like "us against the bad guys" just feels better? Let's just hate them all. No, there is no one political party that's wearing the white hat and the other is wearing the black hat. But there is one that I believe has a greater number of unintelligent, and propogandized members. There is another that I feel actually does on the whole care more about social justice. Why is that so hard to swallow.

[-] 3 points by iDaddy (52) 12 years ago

When you boil it down it is actually 'us vs. the bad guys'. Republicans seek to censor anything that offends it's strict Christian values and seem to be taking a path that leads to less rights to a fair or speedy trial. Democrats seek to take away our ability to defend ourselves and almost consistently ignore the tenth amendment.

Both have stepped on the fourth amendment as well.

Both take large special interest contributions to fund their campaigns and both propagandize either for their side or against the other.

Side one will claim that the other cares nothing for individuals and 'the little guy'. Side two says the other side wants the government to control everything. The media is absolute poison in this regard.

What better way to control a large group of people than to split them into two polar groups? Why shouldn't that be hard to swallow?

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 12 years ago

You may feel like one party cares more about social justice, but if you look at what they do instead of what they say, I think you will find that they don't.

[-] 0 points by theaveng (602) 12 years ago

I believe has a greater number of unintelligent, and propogandized members. There is another that I feel actually does on the whole care more about social justice.

I assume the first is the Republicans, and the second is the Democrats, but I don't see how you can claim the second cares about "social justice" when they are busy passing Bills to Censor the internet (SOPA), jail americans in military jails for being suspected terrorists, assassinate americans suspected of being al-queda (no trial; just summary execution) and giving TSA the power to stop cars along interstates and search the occupants.

I'd have to say the Dems are just as big of a-holes as the Repubs.

As for propaganda, the Dems have their own FOX News channel to take care of that -- except they call it MicroSoft NBC. They even received a multi-billion chunk of cash from Obama and his Congressional Democrats (via his 2009 stimulus bill). So again, I'd say the Dems and Repubs both have "propagandized" membership.

When you hear Democrats say stupid stuff like "The top 1% were charged 90% taxes in the 50s," then you know they've been propagandized. (The actual effective rate, after deductions, was 34% during the 1950s, 38% during the 70s, and 32% today.)

[-] 1 points by JadedGem (895) 12 years ago

Democrats and republicans stink! They don't want the money out of politics and certainly won't pass anything that cuts their own greedy throats. I swear if the Government messes my internet, I'll open a savings account to put the money I save from the switch back to DIAL-UP! :P

[-] 0 points by theaveng (602) 12 years ago

Dialup wouldn't save you any money..... at least it wouldn't for me. $15 for high speed internet versus 7+20 for dialup+phone. The dialup would actually be more expensive.

[-] 1 points by JadedGem (895) 12 years ago

I pay $90 plus dollars per month because dish service is the only way to move up from dial up where I live. Its base package is $50 but if you want to attempt to play online games or watch any YouTube you'll need to go faster and have more bandwidth per month. Yes, my bandwidth is limited too. If I could pay $15 a month and have high speed that would really nice, as it is I can save $80 per month by going to dial up. So ticking me off costs my dish provider over $90 per month. They'll notice if they loose my money and the money of others like me. They are my only option which allows them to rob me if I don't want to be stuck on dial up which is only about 14k to 19k on this bad land-line. Going to dial up would save me tons, and I wouldn't buy one single CD or DVD with it, I promise!

[-] 1 points by FOXraisedHitler (36) from New York City, NY 12 years ago

Just leave the political system as it is and focus on the puppet masters of evil. No, not Soros, the evil ones.

[-] 0 points by tomcat68 (298) 12 years ago

Liberal Extremists ARE moderated, the the Moderators are called "Trolls"

the Trolls don't erase posts or Ban your IP or try to censor posts, in a weird way the Moderators called Trolls use things like, reason and logic to try to Help the misguided advance.

It doesn't always work, but we :"Trolls" do reach a few when they get too high.

[-] 1 points by an0n (764) 12 years ago

Liberal Extremists

Please, try to sound a little more retarded.

[-] 0 points by tomcat68 (298) 12 years ago

ok. how is this...

my name be an0n