Forum Post: Why are people saying to vote for Ron Lawl?? Who the heck is RON LAWL? and why is he better than
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 6, 2011, 1:42 a.m. EST by jjpatrick
(195)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
First of all, who's Ron Lawl?
And why is he better than: Democats' Dennis Kucinich or Independents' Ralph Nader or GOP's: Buddy Roemer
**edit update-- I've been informed who Ron Lawl is but I'm not sure why his name would be blocked out in this forum. He has actually defended OWS and their right to protest, and I've seen many who support RP protesting as well and engaging in conversations.
RonPaul is another anti-establishment politician in my books. More OWS guys should support him. We need more honest politicians of any politician stripe.. just not the status quo establishment guys we have now.
This is one of the things that is wrong with the current system - The media has effectively brainwashed everyone to the point where when it comes to voting you either go republican or democrat and nothing in between o0r outside of the norm . Now before I continue I live in New Zealand but as an outsider I am shocked beyond belief that here's a candidate who wants to restore to you all the freedoms that you have lost. Has the Kahunas to end the fed, bring the troops home and by doing so put enough money back in the coffers to get the economy back. Most importantly given his record he is one in the race who hasn't been bought and people are not sure if they should vote for him!!!???!!! You have 3 options
And also as an impartial outsider - This guy is dead on, your foreign policy is what is causing America to become a target which in turn makes you less safe not more - any muppet with an objective view of the situation can see that.
No one will vote for RonPaul, thats because he's the only one who has any balls to do anything about the sad state this country finds itself in...The elite are so scared of this man that he'd probably get shot on inauguration day.
And if that happened now in this climate occupy would explode off the charts
they never do anything if you say they're going to do it
Oh, then lets "not" vote for him them..
Well, I know Ron Lawl has defended OWS and the protestors right to protest, so I'm not sure why the modulators would be trying to screen out his name.
RonPaul is another anti-establishment politician in my books.
They are openly defaming RonPaul on the basis of election spamming.
They do not want RonPaul discussed here but also say that goes for every other politician.
However no other politician mentioned here is defamed by those running the site. Only him.
Considering the OWS movement is related to political cronyism, big banks, bailouts and lobbyists.
It seems ironic (or sinister) that the only high profile presidential candidate that has spent 30+ years trying to bring these issues to the public's attention is basically blacklisted.
Obviously, there is another agenda.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/moderating-policies-will-be-reposted-somewhere-pro/
Yeah, I'll read it soon. But yeah, OWS needs to understand that they need not only ground warfare but also the air war. In other words, we need to support honest politicians that will take on the establishment.
RonPaul.
The moderators have blocked his name in attempt to stop free and open discussion regarding his policies. No such restrictions for the rest of the war mongerers though.
Proof that the real OWS is a corrupt left wing partisan project. Not a honest movement that wants to improve society. I was really disappointed when I found out. The man who almost invented the protest against the problems today 30 years ago, gets his name blocked by people claiming to want the same. So sad and childish.
This is what the masses seem unable to grasp:
If we replace our current leaders with human beings, they will sell out just as far as the current bunch. Our leaders weren't born sold out. Wall Street executives weren't born evil. They were born human. With a natural instinct to gather and store for survival. A natural instinct to care for family and community.
When modern society was formed, we began to sell out our natural instincts. Survival turned into survival with a little more elbow room. Then survival with a little more elbow room and a nice view. Then survival with a little more elbow room, a nice view, and something pretty to hang around our neck.
Fast forward a few thousand years. With the industrial revolution, came mechanized transportation, modern housing, air conditioning, and television.
We had become somewhat spoiled. Somewhat motivated. Still relatively down to Earth. Still modest enough to appreciate one another, care for one another, and work towards a common goal.
Along the way, the potential for increased personal wealth became more and more intoxicating. Now, the vast overwhelming majority want to be rich. They want it so badly, they are willing to sell out basic morality to attain it. They WILL sell out basic morality if given the opportunity.
How can I be so sure? That's easy. Human nature plus years of corrupt influence plus opportunity.
Mother Nature did not plan for modern society. She did not plan for extreme personal wealth. Once attained, we become fully intoxicated. We simply can not process the concept without being corrupted by it. Without compromising our basic morality.
Extreme personal wealth is the single greatest corrupt influence of modern society. With every 'zero' on the paycheck, our basic instincts to care for family and community are compromised.
Those of you who still aren't convinced, consider this:
If God himself gave you the power to end poverty, bring about world peace, and take a bonus of $100,000,000 for yourself, would you do it?
If God himself gave you the power to end poverty, bring about world peace, OR take a bonus of $100,000,000 for yourself, which would you choose?
Which would the vast overwhelming majority choose?
Why are the richest men and women in the world so incredibly determined to get even richer?
How did the world's wealth become so incredibly concentrated?
Why is the concept of a partial redistribution for the good of all so incredibly divisive and controversial?
How is it that virtually every developed nation in the world has become riddled with fear, instability, and rising debt?
Not only is the greatest concentration of wealth in world history the single greatest underlying cause of economic instability. The very concept of extreme personal wealth is the most intoxicating and corrupt influence in the history of mankind.
I speak the ugly truth.
There will be no reform on Wall Street.
There will be no recovery for the vast majority.
There will be no government "of the people" and "for the people".
Not one of us will live to see it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLwgSMH5Jt4&feature=share
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLwgSMH5Jt4&feature=share