Forum Post: Who Benefits from Rising Productivity?
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 9, 2011, 12:42 p.m. EST by SMR
(0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Rising productivity creates new wealth. Those who help create wealth should share in its benefits: income, that is, should rise roughly in tandem with productivity, as it did from the end of World War II until the mid-1970s. Then income began to lag. Today, income is falling while productivity is rising. From 2000 to 2010, on average, worker productivity rose 2.6% per year, but median household income fell from $52,500 to $49,777. Poverty ($22,113 for a family of four) rose from 11.3% to 15.1% of U.S. population.
Where did the new wealth created by rising productivity go? From 2000 to 2010, on average, corporate profits rose 8% per year, 29.2% in 2010 alone. Stockholders own corporate profits, either as dividends (increasing their incomes) or retained earnings (raising the value of their stock): in 2007, (latest available data) the wealthiest 10% of Americans owned 93% of U.S. business equity. In 2010, the net worth (what you own minus what you owe) of the Forbes 400 wealthiest Americans totaled $1.37 trillion; the “bottom” 180 million Americans’ total net worth was $1.26 trillion.
It's a fascinating question. I just re-read a novel written in 1952 by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr, "Player Piano" about a society where machines do ALL the work, and their are two classes of people: Engineers and Managers who still "work" and are upper class, and then the laid-off workers who don't work but are provided with a nice lifestyle - everything they need.
Workers do not benefit from their own productivity increases because they do not sell their employment, they rent it out.
The USA is incredibly productive due to machines and computers. Why aren't we ALL working 20 or 25 hours per week and ALL enjoying the benefits of our rising productivity?
To me, the big question is "what if we simply don't need everyone to work to provide ALL of the goods and services needed/wanted by our society"? I don't know the answer, but I do know it's only a theory that a capitalistic economy expands to provide (good) jobs for everyone who wants one.
Article: Are Jobs Obsolete?: http://articles.cnn.com/2011-09-07/opinion/rushkoff.jobs.obsolete_1_toll-collectors-robots-jobs?_s=PM:OPINION