Forum Post: Which candidate and why?
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 14, 2011, 10:52 p.m. EST by aerocity
(0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Hey guys, I'm just wondering which candidate you support, and exactly why you support them. Thanks for the input.(:
Anybody but Obama. He has corn holed our way of life. Another term and we will have more retards protesting.
Kermit the Frog, because A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama and vice versa, let's just call them Oromba!
Given the new light being shed on the existing health care bill, LMFO
well newt is out cause he is a raging hypocrite who went after clinton for getting a blow job in the office while he was having an affair under his dying wifes nose..when he got caught...when he served her divorce papers in the hospital she said how can u go after clinton when you are doing this and he said (its not important what i do its important what i say) hes the dick of dicks..hes the ace of lies..obama should endorse or at least support some of ows and obama should move to the left...anyhow hes the lesser of 2 evils and just 1 third of government anyway...people change history not presidents
Give me a break. It's mainstream for politicians to have affairs. You have over dramatized this. I could care less what Newt has done in his personal life. If he can get things done in the White House, I want him in there. What Clinton did in his personal life didn't have much of an affect on him. He beat Bob Dole. Clinton is considered to be one of the best presidents we've had. He and Newt worked together on a lot of issues. Bipartisanship is key for our government to be efficient and effective. Simple as that.
right newt is in the obstructionist party that wants to abolish unions health care ssi and everyone not male or white..oh yea im really gonna vote for a white republican thieving lying freak like that.!! and i didnt overstate anything..hes an actor and a paid servant of buisness...no more american kabuki theatre
So you are calling Newt Gingrich a racist? Wouldn't that make Herman Cain a racist then too, since they both agree on virtually everything (other than Cain's 9-9-9 plan). Don't even get me started on unions.
and cain is an uncle tom..i got self respect rich or poor he cant get me to bow down...ive worked harder than him in my life i have honor he has ego
I don't know how hard you have worked, sir. For you to say Herman Cain is an "uncle tom" is 100% ridiculous. Do some research on the man and stop making ridiculous statements.
ceo..big tough demeaner like he knows it all no compassion dosent even acknowledge the civil rights struggle which he never participated in while he was local to it and in college..i dont care if he is a member of the republican party he can go fuck himself
Sounds like someone is bitter. Maybe Herman Cain felt that his education was important?
i was in 3 unions i know unions can go over the top..ive seen it 1200 guys dumped on the street in 1 day cause they wudnt budge on increase freeze for 2 years in 1980..they blew it for themselves..but newt is just a fat smilyfaced lizard period..just dont like him..obama is better
Some unions are fine, but there are plenty who have given the term union a bad taste in many Americans mouths. You believe that all the scumbag moves that Obama has made deserves him another term in the White House? Come on Michael. Think about this for a second. Solyndra, Brazil, General Electric, etc., etc. Do some research my friend. You'll soon see what our current president likes to do with the taxpayer dollars and who he befriends.
ima good student tell me about brazil ..solyndra wasnt his fault and they spend more than that on napkins in congress
Invested it Petrobus(Brazilian oil company), Then went to Brazil and told them he would like for U.S., to be their best customer.
He went to Solyndra, propped them up as the future of energy in our country. Think he might have done a little research before hand? You just made a point where you agreed with the tea party, overspending.
America invested in Brazil. I am not going to explain it all. Do some research, you obviously have a computer.
Buddy Roemer. He is running his campaign solely on donations of $100 or less. He is focused on actually ending bought government and too big to fail. He's running the Republican primary but his message embodies OWS' message. Unsurprisingly, he has been shut out of the debates
Been saying that all over this forum (even on this post), not in so many words. Glad someone else out there is doing their homework.
Well...considering that both the incumbent and republican nominee will be running BILLION dollar campaigns, I believe your Buddy is going to fail.
isn't part of OWS about ideals? I realize he has virtually no shot.
Shouldn't it be about reality as well....?
I think movements are about shaping reality as well. The CRM changed political reality. Doubt OWS will change the political reality to make Roemer our next president, but moving in that direction ain't a bad thing.
They are all bad, we need someone else who is not in bed with big money.
You should def vote forRon Paul is you are not for a womans right to choose, if you don't support our public schools, if you don't support govt funding of the arts, and if you were against the civil rights act of 1964.
I notice NO ONE is mentioning Herman Cain or Rick Perry. This gives me more hope than anything.
If not Buddy Roemer, I'm sticking with the "devil I know".
I'm voting against every incumbent. Towing the party line instead of the people's line is the first step to the unemployment line.
All bought, can't vote for any of them.
I like Romney, which I know I will get flamed for.
I think he is the one who can most easily beat Obama and I agree with him on a lot of his policies, but far from all of them. I personally believe he knows the economy better than any of the candidates. I realize he became successful in part by laying people off but that was his job. He turned companies around and made them run smoother. That is exactly what needs to be done for the federal government.
I'm from Massachusetts.
I speak for the people of my state when I say we don't like Mitt Romney.
You don't speak for the people of Mass. you bone head! Who the fuck are you?
The Spokesperson for Massachusetts. I already told you.
You have to realize though that he was a moderate conservative in one of the most liberal states. It was a marriage destined for failure.
I still don't know how he could have been elected there. Then again, I personally voted for Scott Brown...
But I can vouch for the fact that Romney is a flip-flopper. Just like other Massachusetts politicians. He was much more liberal in Massachusetts so he could get elected.
Yeah and he is probably being a little extra conservative now. I feel like he is only truly fiscally conservative and he likely doesn't place a high priority on social issues, one way or the other. Which is kind of what I like in my politicians.
Well, I agree with you there. We need a candidate who doesn't try to distract us with social commentary. We need someone who will simply focus on fiscal policy.
Romney is a platform changer (otherwise known as a flip-flopper). And it's not about "who can beat Obama". That's the message you're being sold. Don't buy it. Get a good candidate with a strong message and ANYONE can "beat Obama". Too bad they're few and far between. The GOP is having the same problem the Dems had in 2004.
Doesn't Romney kind of look like John Kerry?
His flip-flopping is just politics. He only flips on social issues to appease a certain base. It is just politics. I want him for his fiscal policies. I doubt he prioritizes social issues one way or the other.
Many more people will come to your side when you are proactive (for “new” Business & Government solutions), instead of reactive (against “old” Business & Government solutions), which is why what we most immediately need is a comprehensive “new” strategy that implements all our various socioeconomic demands at the same time, regardless of party, and although I'm all in favor of taking down today's ineffective and inefficient Top 10% Management System of Business & Government, there's only one way to do it – by fighting bankers as bankers ourselves; that is, using a Focused Direct Democracy organized according to our current Occupations & Generations. Consequently, I have posted a 1-page Summary of the Strategically Weighted Policies, Organizational Operating Structures, and Tactical Investment Procedures necessary to do this at:
http://getsatisfaction.com/americanselect/topics/on_strategic_legal_policy_organizational_operational_structures_tactical_investment_procedures
Join
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/StrategicInternationalSystems/
because we need 100,000 “support clicks” at AmericansElect.org to support a Presidential Candidate -- such as any given political opportunist you'd like to draft -- in support of the above bank-focused platform.
Most importantly, remember, as cited in the first link above, that as Bank Owner-Voters in your 1 of 48 "new" Business Investment Groups (or "new" Congressional Committees) you become the "new" Congress replacing the "old" Congress according to your current Occupation & Generation, called a Focused Direct Democracy.
Therefore, any Candidate (or Leader) therein, regardless of party, is a straw man, a puppet; it's the STRATEGY – the sequence of steps – that the people organize themselves under, in Military Internet Formation of their Individual Purchasing & Group Investment Power, that's important. In this, sequence is key.
Why? Because there are Natural Social Laws – in mathematical sequence – that are just like Natural Physical Laws, such as the Law of Gravity. You must follow those Natural Social Laws or the result will be Injustice, War, etc.
The FIRST step in Natural Social Law is to CONTROL the Banks as Bank Owner-Voters. If you do not, you will inevitably be UNJUSTLY EXPLOITED by the Top 10% Management Group of Business & Government who have a Legitimate Profit Motive, just like you, to do so.
Consequently, you have no choice but to become Candidates (or Leaders) yourselves as Bank Owner-Voters according to your current Occupation & Generation.
So please JOIN the 2nd link so we can make our support clicks at AmericansElect.org when called for, at exactly the right time, by an e-mail from that group, in support of the above the bank-focused platform in the 1st link. If so, then you will see and feel how your goals can be accomplished within the above strategy as a “new” Candidate (or Leader) of your Occupation & Generation.
I don't know about "becoming bankers" ourselves. It runs the risk of "becoming what you behold". What NEEDS to happen is a productive CREATIVE spirit re-emerging in the US. We need to make something other than money.
I totally agree with you, but you MUST control the Banks as Bank Owner-Voters FIRST, before you can delete them and create the next step.
Newt Gingrich. The reason why is simple. The man is a genius. Not only is he a genius but he has WAY more experience than any other candidate with bipartisanship. He has way more experience dealing with our federal government than any other candidate. Finally, he is one hell of a debater that knows what to say and when to say it. He would eat Obummer for breakfast, lunch, and dinner in a debate.
So what? Both bought with corporate money. Both can gtfo.
I agree, I would love to see him debate Obama and his teleprompter. He would be embarrassed.