Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Where Does the 99% Movement Go From Here?

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 9, 2011, 8:01 p.m. EST by Hawthorne (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

In order to have any tangible effects upon the current political, economic, and social systems within the United States, the “Occupy Wall Street” movement must organize into a coherent political force to effect change.

99% of the US population will never rise to the economic level of the 1% of the population who control 90+% of the wealth in this nation either by birthright, marriage, luck, talent, genius, industry, or criminality.

Demonstrating and whining about political, economic, and social inequalities within the current political, economic, and social system is an excellent method of publicizing a cause and scaring the hell out of the 1% who have the most to lose from a peasant revolution, but will never actually change the status quo which can only be done either at the ballot box, or through revolutionary means as did the Founding Fathers of the American and French revolutions in the 18th century, Russian revolutionaries in the 20th century, and Tunisian, Egyptian, Libyan, Syrian, and Yemeni revolutionaries in the 21st Century.

The obvious place to start the 99% movement for political, economic, and social change is through grass roots organizing to register every single unemployed, poverty stricken, downtrodden, and/or disenfranchised American to vote in their home districts. They are mad as hell and they aren’t going to take it anymore, but they can vote.

Simultaneously with this voter registration drive, the 99% movement must formulate a fundamental set of principles to organize a cohesive national political movement around. Internet communication between 99% chapters in different cities can create a public forum for debate over what those principles should be.

It is no secret that the current makeup of the House of Sanctimonious Hypocrites and Senate of Anachronistic Obstructionists is deadlocked beyond any hope of actually doing anything to relieve the suffering of the American people, so electing new members to Federal, State, and local offices must become the initial focus of the 99% movement. Jimmy Breslin’s “Vote the Rascals In” campaign slogan can become the 99% movement’s rallying cry.

The next issue is where to find candidates to run for office regardless of party affiliation who will support 99% principles? Once the 99% movement matures to the point where it can demonstrate the ability to vote in a cohesive block, political candidates will magically appear on their own seeking votes, campaign help, and financial support.

During the past 5,000 years mankind has evolved from savagery to barbarism to monarchism to feudalism to mercantilism to colonialism to capitalism to communism to corporatism. Economies change, technologies change, and knowledge changes over time. Political systems must evolve and change as well, so now is the time to call for a Constitutional Convention to rewrite the fundamental law of the land to address the realities of the 21st century world that we now live in, instead of the 18th century world of the Founding Fathers who addressed the realities of their day in the current constitution.

A Constitutional Convention can ask and resolve issues such as:

• Is a parliamentary system more efficient and cost effective then the current three branches of government system? • Is the Electoral College really necessary to elect a President? • Is a single legislative body with 2-Year terms more efficient and democratic then a bi-cameral legislature? • Should the Senate with its obstructionist arcane rules be abolished because it is an inefficient impediment to the democratic process? • Shall State boundaries be redrawn to reduce the number of State governments and bring efficiencies of scale to State operations? • Shall electoral districts be redrawn to insure equal representation for all districts in the nation? • What type of tax system shall the Federal government use to raise revenues? • What type of limits shall be placed upon Congressional spending? • Shall the President have a line item veto for spending bills?

The list of possible changes to the US political system through a Constitutional Convention is endless.

8 Comments

8 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by pcantelme (7) 13 years ago

Tax Wall Street transactions and use the money to create jobs and save mortgages. Whoever does not Vote for such a plan should be voted out of office. It is time to spread the wealth and hold the financial industry accountable.

[-] 1 points by ResourceBasedEconomy (23) 13 years ago

Before getting into rhetoric for new laws, demands, rights, what have you, I strongly urge writers to read "Politics and the English Language" By George Orwell before mocking our ancestors vernacular. The reason for this suggestion is because of the lacking in clarity many words retain. Euphemisms and drawn out phrases, which handicap mutual understanding. For example, words like adequate, decent, and balanced (to name a few) don't lead to a discoverable object or objective, thus leading to open interpretations, creating arguments, furthermore, dividing us. He clarifies the issue well in his article. Here is the link:

http://orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit

[-] 1 points by ResourceBasedEconomy (23) 13 years ago

Just a suggestion to one of the above questions. Instead of limiting congressional spending, perhaps limiting the maximum tax to each individual in terms of percentage may be more appropriate. The mistake made is putting a group in charge of public domains as opposed to protecting the public.

Secondly, the fewer people in office the easier the accountability measures. Too many people in office gives too many more excuses and people to hide behind. Fewer Congressional members would be a good start. At this point in time if we're pursuing a representative democracy, we have so many means of communication that local is becoming a broader paradigm.

[-] 1 points by geminijlw (176) from Mechanicsburg, PA 13 years ago

I think today we have a good system of government based on the principals originally set down in the Consitution. We have just strayed too far. Term limits would make it more geared towards us. Instead of learning from the old guard those in office would not be career, but people that want to do public service, and would have to rely on the people to guide them, as to what they want. Maybe I am a dreamer, but we need term limits and an American Party, independent of the other two parties. We need a party for the people.

[-] 1 points by beyondmoney22 (233) 13 years ago

This is the answer. www.radiokazoo.net/OPV

[-] 1 points by mattthecapitalist (157) 13 years ago

I love our current constitution. I will pass on your convention.

[-] 1 points by cap1 (65) 13 years ago

Agreed. Our constitution seems to be the best version on earth in my opinion. Every democracy on earth has had on average 2.5 civil wars. We even had one, but it was only one. I'm not sure why we would need another revolution with how well we have it off compared to a third of the rest of the world, which doesn't even have running water, electricity, reliable shelter, a formal education system, paved roads, etc etc etc.