Forum Post: What is the big deal about Noam Chomsky? I don't get it
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 13, 2011, 10:51 p.m. EST by ViVAGALLEANi
(0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Noam Chomsky is a brilliant man. However, the natural course of his life contradicts the Anarchists obsession with him, and I do not understand why so many Anarchists put him on a pedestal. Chomsky is very quick to refer to Kropotkin, as well as Bakunin, and he should because these are our "Founding Fathers" of Libertarian Socialism/Anarchism, a political ideology that Chomsky and I both seem to agree on. However, Anarchists may want to put more weight on what their very own working class lives have taught them about this culture and this society, and view Chomsky, a man of Anarcho-brilliance, as a man who shares the same political ideology; and leave it at that. Our "Founding Fathers" of Anarchism have stated as clear as day that in order for a member of the middle class to become an Anarchist, the first thing he must do upon that decision, is to become a member of the working class. Unfortunately Chomsky, from birth, was never a member of our class. Although the mental capacity the man has to absorb every detail of every international ill and the names those involved from what seems to be since the beginning of recorded history with the Sumarians more than makes up for not directly being a man of working class origins and we know that he is a man that sincerly knows what he is speaking in favor of when he claims Anarchism, but that does not change the fact that he is non worker.
As Anarchists, we must leave the intellectual aspects of Anarchism to the middle class sympathizers and allow ourselves, those of us who are of working class origins, grow and evolve in the part of our movement that the workers were born and bred to participate in; the frontlines of organizing our class by any means necessary. Chomsky is a great speaker with the knowledge that seems to be that of an encyclopedia, which is better than perfect, for someone who has not 1 inkling as to what is and has been going on with governments and corporations in the world since the 2 were created. And no, I do not feel that Chomsky deserves any praise whatsoever. If you need to listen to Chomsky, or anyone for that matter to tell you to rebel or to teach you Anarchist politics, than you underestimate yourself. Look at your day to day life. As a working wo/man, you already knew these politics simply because they are common sense to us. You just didn't know that there was an actual name or ideology for what you were thinking.
Yeah-ya. Whatever.
That doesn't change the fact that Chomsky was attempting to bring attention to the genocide in East Timor - and that means defending human rights - with a commitment and an integrity that apparently you not only can't match, you won't even try.
He was right when he said Carter could do something - yet Carter did not. Reagan did not. Bush did not. The killing continued even under Clinton, until 1998 - and all it took apparently, was but one or two words from our American President.
Just one or two words.
I wonder just how many H.U.N.D.R.E.D.S o.f. T.H.O.U.S.A.N.D.S. of lives were lost in East Timor during those twenty or so years . . .
You don't need to agree with every single word a Brilliant Man says to acknowledge him as a Brilliant Man and respect his goals and ambitions.
retitle your article "What's the big deal about Kropotkin, Bakunin and Chomsky?"
Let's play the "Chomsky minimum game". It works like this. Find a video or podcast of Chomsky saying that government is controlled by corporations then saying that we should give government more power. The one who can post a video or podcast with the smallest time between him saying the first and the second wins.
He's a human. Nuff said. Follow at ur own risk.
"Do as I say, not as I do."
Chomsky has always been and will always be a hack. He's a darling of the anarchists because they aren't any smarter than he is.
[Removed]