Forum Post: What happened

So I came on to your site seeking answers, and somehow the Username Unrelenting got blocked from posting because I posted this:

So I do not consider myself to be a supporter of OWS. Rather I read the stories about your movement and ask myself numerous questions. So after trying to get a handle on why OWS acts in certain ways, I figured I would go directly to the source. Question 1; what is the income cutoff for being part of the 99%? I saw one news story that reported people earning $531,000 a year were part of the 99%. A different story led me to believe that it was closer to $375,000. In an article on MSNBC about the tents, one of your members was quoted as saying she is living paycheck to paycheck, but also that she lives in Manhattan. To people like me, this seems less like a case of financial equality and more a case of financial irresponsibility. This leads directly to Question 2; how can your movement ask for support if by all appearances your members are living above their means? Question 3; why are you not occupying Washington DC? Why not camp out in front of the White House? It seems like asking the 1% to voluntarily change is an act of futility. If they haven't changed their actions at this point, why would you camping in a park change it? Question 4; does your movement REALLY support the transformation of the United States into a Socialist Regime? Why should my money go towards people who didn't earn it? Question 5; if your movement is about a "redistribution of wealth", why does your movement want to exclude those who are less well off than yourselves? I am speaking of the homeless people that numerous news reports have quoted members of OWS and other sites as saying they do not want around because "it will enable others to disregard our movement" or "we want separation because they could be dangerous". If I could have CIVIL answers to these questions, I would appreciate it.

It looks as if the thread I started was deleted now, as it was updated 47 minutes ago and yet is not on the right side when you click on an individual post. However other, older posts still are, and derogatory posts are there. What was wrong with my questions?

Also, I have this as a follow up:

Point 1: I guess I just don't see how some making roughly 18 times the poverty line has in common with someone who is earning less than the poverty line. It seems like the reason your movement says 99% is because it is more catchy than truthful. How many people earning $500,000+ are really on your side?

Point 2: If the rent is too high, move. Why take to the street and complain that you can't live where you can't afford? Is it the wealthy's responsibility to pay for your rent?

Point 3: I have been perusing your forum, and there doesn't seem to be a logical reason for WHY you are occupying Wall Street as opposed to the White House. To the contrary, there seems to be A LOT of support for Obama.

Point 4: It seems like the general message is you think the wealthy (which is somehow people earning OVER $532,000?) have too much money. In the OWS commercial, there is a girl who states that the wealthy should be taxed to pay for her education. If that is not a step towards Socialism, I don't know what is.

Point 5: So why does your movement want to preclude the Homeless? They are less powerful than you.