Forum Post: we have the tools right now for a global vote via the internet
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 1, 2011, 7:22 p.m. EST by thechurchofjohnlennon
(0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
use the internet for everyone globally to come to decisions about all the issues that are screwed up now via HONEST facts transmitted over the internet- then people come up with an honest answer to the many issues- then HAVE A GLOBAL VOTE on what everyone wants to do on everything- if billions around the world disregard the establishment route and create their own fact-finding-decision making and voting system via the internet, you could start to create a new system that works only via facts and consensus- ALL THE TOOLS ARE AVAILABLE TO BYPASS THE SYSTEM AND CREATE A WORLD MOVEMENT for the first time-
With Global Governence the problems compound. The core of the problem is that people don't have power today because of centralized power. Going Global is going to make that worse. The reason we are where we are today is because people have no control anymore at the LOCAL level. LOCAL markets, LOCAL production. LOCAL govt. Thats the Key, Ever heard of the monkey sphere? google it! It will expalin the nature of mankind. The minute we surrender to a global world order, the very agenda of those who already control the money flow would be accomplished!
Say NO to the New World Order!
I agree we don't want any sort of global gov't unless it is dealing with unavoidable global issues, like pollution. We already have that!
Though the OP is right, we do have the tools to make internet voting happen. If someone claims otherwise, they are either uninformed or they have an agenda.
At first glance it seemed absurd...but then I began to look at the tool proposed....yes. It is possible. It would take some mega programming and data base control, but damn the tool is in place for this. The net is in fact one huge voting machine. People use it all the time in surveys etc. Why not use it for this?
We need to end the fed first ... then we can fight about direct democracy.
that is just plain stupid