Forum Post: We are at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in World history. The future of humanity is at stake.
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 27, 2011, 4:34 p.m. EST by alouis
(1511)
from New York, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
World War III: The Launching of a Preemptive Nuclear War against Iran
by Michel Chossudovsky
The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran has been on the active drawing board of the Pentagon since 2005.
If such a war were to be launched, the entire Middle East Central Asia region would flare up. Humanity would be precipitated into a World War III Scenario.
World War III is not front-page news. The mainstream media has excluded in-depth analysis and debate on the implications of these war plans.
The onslaught of World War III, were it to be carried out, would be casually described as a "no-fly zone", an operation under NATO's "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) with minimal "collateral damage" or a "limited" punitive bombing against specific military targets, all of which purport to support "Global Security" as well as "democracy" and human rights in the targeted country.
Public opinion is largely unaware of the grave implications of these war plans, which contemplate the use of nuclear weapons, ironically in retaliation to Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program.
Moreover, 21st Century military technology is at an advanced stage of development combining an array of sophisticated weapons systems.
We are at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in World history.
The future of humanity is at stake.
The present situation is one of advanced war planning by a formidable military force using nuclear warheads.
The Pentagon’s global military design is one of world conquest.
The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously.
Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: “[The] five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.”
Military action is waged in the name of the "Global War on Terrorism" and Global Security. It has a stated "humanitarian" "pro-democracy" mandate.
It is predicated on the notion that the West's arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons are (in contrast to those [nonexistent] of the Islamic Republic), according to expert scientific opinion on contract to the Pentagon, "harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground."
Irresponsible politicians are unaware of the implications of their actions. They believe their own war propaganda: nuclear weapons are heralded as an instrument of peace and democracy.
War is heralded as a peace-keeping making operation carried out with the support of the "international community".
The victims of war are described as the perpetrators. Iran and Syria constitute a threat to Global Security thereby justifying pre-emptive military action.
Global Warfare
The concept of the "Long War" has characterised US military doctrine since the end of World War II.
The broader objective of global military dominance in support of an imperial project was first formulated under the Truman administration in the late 1940s at the outset of the Cold War.
We are dealing with a global military agenda, namely "Global Warfare". The 2000 Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which was the backbone of the NeoCon's agenda was predicated on "waging a war without borders".
The PNAC's declared objectives were to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" in different regions of the World as well perform the so-called military "constabulary" duties "associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions". Global constabulary implies a Worldwide process of military policing and interventionism, including covert operations and "regime change". (Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding Americas Defenses.pdf, September 2000)
This diabolical military project formulated by the NeoCons was adopted and implemented from the very outset of the Obama administration. With a new team of military and foreign policy advisers, Obama has been far more effective in fostering military escalation than his predecessor in the White House, who has recently been condemned by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal for "Crimes against the Peace".
In the present context, US military and intelligence actions are been undertaken in different part of the the World.
Ongoing war plans within the broader Middle East Central Asian region would involve coordinated actions against Iran, Syria and Pakistan leading to an extended regional war theater. The three existing and distinct war theaters (Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine) would merge into a broad regional war extending from the Lebanese-Syrian East Mediterraean coastline to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border with Western China (See map below). Israel, Lebanon and Turkey would be engulfed in the conflict.
read more at this link
Even this is underestimation of the situation.
Russia and China are allies with Iran, they warned America about attacking Iran.
Russia will supply new anti-aircraft missiles for Iran. Russia already supplies weapons to Iran and will most likely protect Iran with their missile defense interceptors that Medvedev keeps talking about and most likely will not interfere if Iran will choose to respond.
It might become a big mess.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein
Russia and China have been long time friends with Iran. When the war breaks out (which it will eventually do) We will be fighting against the Middle East, China, Russia and whoever else.
That's exactly my point.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein
This catastrophic situation traces back to stolen elections and a false flag operation as well s constantly repeated lies.
You think a different president will change the plans? What are your sources for the rest of the claims?
Perhaps a different president elected with a different type of political mandate might have done things differently. The lie of 911 was and is key to the propaganda case that has been made against Iraq and Afghanistan and is being recycled now to cover Iran. It would seem that planning for 911 had to have begun under the Clinton watch but I have no way to know.
Yeah, I noticed that recycled propaganda, I also noticed more accuracies of different propaganda against Iran, besides their "nuclear weapon constriction" of cause. (1), (2), (3), I'm sure you won't have trouble to find more.
Iran is preparing for war? No! Why would they do that? Iran doesn't tolerate spies when they catch them? Terrible.
You misunderstanding my point. I'm not talking about Iran preparing for war, it's propaganda against Iran. Notice, it's all recent news.
Sorry. I have been known to misunderstand some comments. Yes, it's mainly recent news and "news" that is being used to whip up a war fever against Iran.
When is this all going to happen? I'm 25 and trying to plan my future and I can't because I end up thinking about this stuff and say to myself well why even try anymore. It sucks! I hope the afterlife is better than this.
An aware public that is ready to go out and demonstrate against the war plans is what is needed. These indeed are scary times. I wish you well.
This is why we are here this is why you are needed.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/inside-job-documentary/
Share, circulate, educate, inspire.