Forum Post: Violation of Freedom of Speech!
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 3, 2011, 8:07 p.m. EST by avoiceofreason
(0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I have posted a few different threads under various aliases. What I have found disturbs me. When I post something that could be considerred anti-OWS, my login gets blocked and I can neither post a new message nor reply to a message. However, when I begin a thread with something that is pro-OWS, I am free to comment as I please. Intentional or not, this comes across as an organization that refuses to listen to reasonable arguments that differ from their own. This not only violates my 1st Amendment rights but also deters others from having an actual conversation with you guys. This could possibly be one of the reasons it is difficult for those of us who may hold differnt views from working together with you toward possible solutions. I also may just be talking to a wall.
What topics are you posting about? There are good and bad ways to post controversial topics.
A hosted website is not obliged to post anything, and if you have been censored, it means you violated the posting policy. I have read more posts hostile toward the movement in this forum than anywhere else on the net, so being against some idea is or even the movement itself is not enough to get you booted.
Actually it doesn't violate any of your rights. The owner of the website is not legally obligated in any way to show your posts.
I just wish they would get the (below 9/11 stuff) conspiracy nuts and the pot sellers off the forum.
This will evolve into something significant soon. Most of my posts and comments get arguements.
People do not like to add on to an idea or create one themselves. They like to tell you why your wrong, how you are wrong... and at best, just say "good idea".
I'm here looking for people who will ask "how" or "why".
That's strange there is plenty of anti OWS sentiment on here. Unless you mean when you start a thread that is anti OWS your login gets blocked.
I discovered that last night when I first came here. This place still seems to be chaos though.
This is my fourth name. There is plenty of censoring in here...especially if you start a discussion and you are not on the same page as the OWS
I've seen that. My grandson told me what a troll is. The normal forums I go to they don't cuss or call each other names, but it's more of a homesteading/survival thing that most here wouldn't understand.
I post anti OWS everyday, and while i get treated pretty unnecessarily rude, i havent been blocked YET
Try this free speech.
Do you think I'm a plant?
http://overthecoals.blogspot.com/ -- read more
The Pentagon was hit by a missile on 9/11
American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the western side of the Pentagon at 09:37 EDT. All 64 people on board the aircraft, including the 5 hijackers, were killed, as were 125 people in the building. Dozens of people witnessed the crash and news sources began reporting on the incident within minutes. The impact severely damaged an area of the Pentagon and ignited a large fire. A portion of the Pentagon collapsed; firefighters spent days trying to fully extinguish the blaze.
Of course an investigation would have taken pictures of the remains of the plane. There would have been jet engines, hundreds of seats, the landing gear, pieces of luggage and bodies of the victims if the official story was true. The law suit by April Gallop who worked at the same spot of the explosion and claimed there was no sign of any plane was dismissed by Judge Denny Chin. Chin was then promoted from the SDNY district court to the 2nd Circuit. On appeal 2nd Circuit judge John M. Walker, Jr. sat on the panel. Walker is the cousin of President George Bush in a case filed against Cheney, Rumsfeld, and General Meyers.
Judge Chin's reason was that April Gallop is delusional. If the Boeing jet had truly crashed into the Pentagon, the pictures of the debris would have validated Chin's reason to dismiss the suit. Allowing the trial would have revealed April was delusional by producing the photos of the plane's parts.
Obviously there were no plane parts because there are no photos. Flight 77 was taken some place and all 64 people were murdered. These are facts they are not opinions.
Why are you constantly self promoting?
I write to expose corruption. You didn't notice. You are ignorant.
You insult my intelligence because you're rude and arrogant like the 2 nitwits on Colbert. http://overthecoals.blogspot.com/
An OWS critic asked if I knew how many conspirators in 9/11.
All the commandos who rigged the explosives, Bush, Condi, Rumsfeld, Silverstein, the entire 911 Commission who were exposed by Philip Shenon when he published THE COMMISSION. Its a huge number which I can't possibly know.
Arrest the above group and put them in a super max with an ultimatum to speak about each individual involved or they will be there until they die. I'd get very close to the exact number. To rig thousands of explosives throughout all the columns they blew would take a large group at least 2 weeks and maybe 6 weeks. All the pieces that were blown up were photographed. Very sophisticated detonation by highly trained commandos. Only idiots would believe any building will collapse straight down by a random plane crash.
Read my post about the NYT conspired not to publish incredible facts by Shenon, their reporter assigned to the Commission. Invite me to the park for a presentation with pictures of the evidence.
what now ?
You asked to speak. They turned you down. Get over it you wannabe politician.
I wannabe a big shot like you. Colbert exposed OWS stupidity & screwballs.