Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: VIDEO: Truth about the Wall Street Bailout: How "Free Market Capitalism" Really Works. Nader and Chomsky Explain the Game, a Nanny State to Take Care of the Rich

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 10, 2011, 3:51 a.m. EST by RepresentativePress (16)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The Truth about the Wall Street Bailout: How "Free Market Capitalism" Really Works. Nader and Chomsky Explain the Game, a Nanny State to Take Care of the Rich. Socialism for the Rich, Nanny State serves "the Capitalists" SEE how it really works with Capitalism & Socialism http://Tinyurl.com/BailoutTruth

Ralph Nader has a good video about the wall street bailout, I'll play you a short clip and also a clip of Chomsky talking about capitalism in the real world.

Nader is right, the bailout is yet another example of socialism for the rich which has been the game that's always been played.

Chomsky explains that the free market theory sold to the public is just a fantasy. He shows how in the real world, different rules apply to the rich. the rich make sure they have the nanny state to take care of themselves. We are being played for fools. Let's get the word out. Send this link to others: http://Tinyurl.com/BailoutTruth Also see * http://Tinyurl.com/LiarsCriminals ★ ★ ★ Please Subscribe →↘↓↓↓ http://www.Tinyurl.com/YouTubeSub Also please Join e-mail list →↘↓↓↓ ★ ★ ★ http://www.Tinyurl.com/JoinEmail http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/09/truth-about-wall-street-bailout.html

4 Comments

4 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by apell1992 (51) 13 years ago

What Noam Chansky is referring to is a corruption of the free market. He talks about the FMS in which there still is an imposed "nanny state." If there existed an ACTUAL nanny state, in any definition, then it's against the definition of "free market." To actually be a pure free market, such regulations wouldn't exist. Noam is referring to the "free market" that we use today - the failed one that is neither pure nor free.

It's important to distinguish between faux free market and pure free market. The first one fails. The second one doesn't.

[-] 1 points by RepresentativePress (16) 13 years ago

" pure" and "free"? Looks like you have bought into the propaganda. "The second one doesn't." WOW, you really need to reexamine your assumptions. How in the world can you believe "pure free market" "doesn't fail"?! ANd what in the world would it be, you need to understand it would be an artificial construct that would have to operate on some set of rules. There is a ton of economic propaganda which dominates our society, you need to look beyond the fanatical belief in a mythical market of no regulations that "doesn't" fail.

[-] 1 points by apell1992 (51) 13 years ago

Commerce does not fail. Commerce does not need a third party arbitrator. That's a fact.

[-] 1 points by RepresentativePress (16) 13 years ago

"Commerce does not fail" THAT is stupid.