Forum Post: Typical Police Nepotism and the 'just us' Justice System.
Posted 11 years ago on Dec. 20, 2012, 2:03 p.m. EST by FawkesNews
(1290)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
James Champion the typical corrupted nepotist cop who lived next door to a heavily armed and troubled family; yet looked the other way when he should have known to be concerned for public safety. We should all expect law enforcement to look the other way when it is their own families that jeopardize 'citizens'. This whole thing is filled to the brim and overflowing with chit.
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20121214/NEWS03/121219461
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/national/relatives-of-nancy-lanza-speak-out
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/12/14/fbi-questions-family-of-newtown-ct-shooter-in-nh/
I read through the articles, Fawkes...where is the nepotism?
Where is the nepotism? Obvious, yet 'not' in plain sight.
You can easily test my hypothesis with this experiment... "Officer, I am afraid of my unemployed, 20 year old devil worshiping, weapons obsessing son, He refuses to stop playing murder simulators, even though I take him to the 'real gun' shooting range, and I have a house filled to the brim with guns and food, in preparation for the Zombie Apocalypse." See what happens.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9752141/Connecticut-school-massacre-Adam-Lanza-spent-hours-playing-Call-Of-Duty.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/19/adam-lanza-motive_n_2329508.html
Incidentally, thanks for the second amendment review.
Fawkes........stop making this shit up as you go. Because someone is mentally ill there is no reason to arrest them.
Do you play Call of Duty? Black Ops?
I understand your position, it was my own once; but the more I look into this shooting, the more it unravels before my eyes. You don't actually need to test my hypothesis, to understand it. In fact, I would not recommend it as you can read here why it is bad idea. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother-mental-illness-conversation_n_2311009.html
Mental illness and gun ownership need never be mixed, yet there they are, right under the nose of an officer of the law. How much did he know and how above the law did she feel because of him.
P.S. I play no games.
I posted a link regarding the above mentioned mother two days ago. I think the dumbest thing was to bring any gun into the house with someone who is not mentally sound. I think that teaching him to shoot was the fucking worst.
But, that's about it. I can't nail her for the 250 thousand dollars a year child support. I can't nail her for having issues with school districts that are usually inept. I can't nail her for her child living in a basement that his brother had lived in or with him playing video games. I can't nail her for going up to a bar and not discussing her personal life or for loaning people money. I can't even nail her for being a republican. I am even looking for nepotism.
If mom was trying to get him into a psych ward then he may have become violent with her at home. Not unusual. Especially the older that some of these kids get the worse the outbursts are and they usually target .........mom. So.........she may have come to the realization that she was not going to be able to keep this kid at home as they had probably planned. Nobody has ever seen someone with autism go on a shooting spree. Which is why people think that there is something more to the story or more to his mental illness.
But, they sure as hell have seen them become unhinged if things aren't just so. This game or these pictures here or this food every day at the same time or this routine every day. I know a kid that insisted on playing that old Nintendo duck hunting game. He beat the shit out of his mother when she disciplined her then three year old. He was 6 feet tall and weighed a good 180. They put him on medication and he gained another 40 pounds. He still acts out.
Thanks for your detailed response. I agree with a good amount of it but the obvious seems to escape the discussion. Here I try.
If the standards upheld by police officers in regards to children that act violently, or exhibit dangerous tendencies are enough to destroy the families of the lower class, unable to afford private care, then they ought to be applied to families of law enforcement regardless of the relation. Law enforcement fails to intercede in the lives of their own children for fear of the damage these types of diagnoses will do to the rest of the childs' life. They have little concern for the children the citizenry, though they act with the 'interest of public safety'. (I hope I don't need to give examples of what happens to those with troubled youth and no money. I know you can understand my point.)
There is no way that a police chief had a sister who collected bazookas, yet knew nothing of his own troubled nephew. That shitbag is going to distance himself from any implication involved. Count on it.
In the good ole days of domestic disturbance the cops walked the kid around to the back of the house and kicked the shit out of him for abusing his mother. The poor are the very reason this no longer occurs; police are powerless, their hands have been tied by our far too liberal society.
Words, especially our liberal words of understanding, unfortunately, are rarely an effective deterrent for a child that is determined.
"Good ole days?" "Blaming the poor?" "Police powerless?" "Blaming liberals?" Sadly, you have devalued your own legitimacy. Perhaps you may reword your yourself and I would be happy to discuss it with you.
Until then.....thank you for your reply.