Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Tolerate the Tea Partiers? We should embrace them!

Posted 12 years ago on Jan. 28, 2012, 7:36 p.m. EST by alterorabolish1 (569)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

My friends from my many years of being a conservative republican are still asleep. I was one of them until the financial crisis in 2008, and I was still partially asleep because I bought into Obama's "change we can believe in" message.

Now that I'm wide awake, I congratulate those of you that have been awake all along. If you believe the democratic party is the answer you yourself are still asleep. This is not the time to gloat or blame others.

My friends believe so strongly in America, they trust our government to do the right thing! They honestly do not believe that our government would allow people to cheat! They believe that those who cheat are ultimately caught and punished. They cannot accept that America has a corrupt political process. They sincerely believe Welfare Queens are more of a problem than Crony Capitalism.

They are not stupid! Those of you who feel superior need to consider your goals. They will be very helpful when they wake up because they are highly resolved to help this nation be great again. How can we wake them gently?

55 Comments

55 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 6 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

We need to concentrate on what's hurting members of both movements: the destruction of the middle class and our constitution being destroyed.

[-] 5 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

We need to focus on the things where we are in agreement. Possibly only one issue, "Money is not speech". Ideal things like equality, freedom, the Declaration of Independence are issues where almost everyone would agree.

Other important issues might cause divisions and should be avoided until we establish the importance of removing the money influence out of our political process.

[-] 1 points by TruthRightsFreedom (259) 12 years ago

It is such an incredible mess that only an Article V convention can straigten it out. If preparatory amendments are agreed upon by delegates, then the people empowered to inform themselves for a time. There is no chance of a runaway.

[-] -1 points by BonTon (57) 12 years ago

I thought defending Islamo-fascism was your priority. Now you want to concentrate on real issues??

[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

There is no Islamo-fascism, you are being played into giving up your rights and freedoms.

[-] -2 points by BonTon (57) 12 years ago

Giving up my rights and freedoms? You mean from lefties like you who want to censor movies you disagree with and haven't even seen?

[-] 3 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

Please use the nomdeguerre four step method: 1) engage brain, 2) breathe, 3) open mouth, 4) speak -- you always get things wrong. I never said anything about censoring that movie regarding private or commercial showings, only that the NYPD absolutely should not be allowed to brainwash fools such as yourself with official showings of it. Ray Kelly deserves to be fired for that.

[-] -3 points by BonTon (57) 12 years ago

Right, God forbid the NYPD should be trained to recognize fascist Islamist terrorists. I mean, it's not like NYC was ever attacked two times by their ilk, or that they ever threatened to attack the subways, or made numerous other threats against NYC targets. All figments of my imagination. I've been "played", right? (And you still haven't seen the movie, correct?)

[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

Do a little research on the concept of false flag attacks, dumb dumb.

The scariest of all those TERRORISTS you mentioned was the hydrogen peroxide bomber. Oooooh, I'm scared now. Oh yeah, that Times Square incompetent nimrod was pretty scary too.

Luckily the FBI doesn't give their patsy's real explosives (at least not often, of course '93 was a big exception).

[-] -1 points by BonTon (57) 12 years ago

Oh damn, a truther.

A genuine,God's honest, dyed-in-the-wool, black helicopters & all, conspiracy theorizing truther.

Stupid of me not to realize sooner that I was dealing with a nutcase.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

Thanks for bumping this post. A union of both movements would be your worst nightmare, fascist scum.

[-] 1 points by BonTon (57) 12 years ago

How about Truthers, OWS and tea partiers united? Hoo-ray! Then we'll add the RonPaulians and - voila - utopia!

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

You got that right -- a union of all who believe in the Constitution.

Sorry if that thought causes you to have to change your pampers, maybe I should have led up to it more gently.

[-] 3 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 12 years ago

To Hell with political parties! Embrace all people. Democracy is for the people, not the organizations. There is no part of Democracy that must include them. Democrats and Republicans are the same as the bloods and crips. A gang war is taking place in Congress! They draw power from their members, and are a tyranny over the non members, the antithesis of democracy.

Don't ever call a person anything other than a human being. That is what we are, not our points of view.

If OWS ever becomes a party, or joins with one, I will distance myself from it like it was the plague.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

This is a great post and i agree completely. This perspective is my hope for our future.

[-] 3 points by ARod1993 (2420) 12 years ago

What I'd like to see happen is the growth of a brand new movement out of the old, one that merges the calls for public-sector efficiency and accountability coming from the Tea Party, the calls for a serious look at income and tax inequality and better corporate accountability coming from Occupy Wall Street, and the demands for retraction of police power over the individual coming from both sides into a rational answer to our country's current predicament.

[-] 3 points by freakyfriday (179) 12 years ago

Excellent msg. I have stated more than once that right leaning folks are also part of the 99% and that we share common concerns. Am generally met with scorn and vulgar insults. The movement doesn't stand a chance with their conservative bigotry.

[-] 3 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

Yep, either we are the 99% or we're something else. Amazing to me people blast conservatives for getting their info from Fox News, (yes, it does deceive them), but allow themselves to be deceived to think conservatives are all evil.

[-] 2 points by debndan (1145) 12 years ago

Same here. I think it goes down to 'hurray for our side' mentalities that makes many liberal types so bigoted. Oh sure, the same thing happens on the right.

But what makes it especially hypocritical on the left is when they say they hold no prejudices, then produce a junk science report, then exclaim see, I always thought that anyhow.

How can a liberal claim to be inclusive and then tout reports that are anything but?

The road to bigotry and hate starts with the thought that you are better than someone else. But when we start with the premise that we are all equal, we can shed our bigotry and hate and actually accomplish something.

[-] 3 points by ARod1993 (2420) 12 years ago

As far as I'm concerned, we can work out the "liberal or conservative" part later down the line (or failing that just go back to squabbling like usual, although I'd hope we've learned better than that) but our main concerns need to be protection of civil liberties and ousting of corporate interests from our government. There's enough common ground on that alone that we could conceivably make major headway. If "conservatives" or whatever they want to call themselves refuse to work with us on those issues, then don't ask me to give them the time of day. Otherwise, we're wasting potential by not reaching out to them.

[-] 3 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

I think conservatives would work with us on those idealistic issues and there is enough common ground to make major headway. Just focus on the major issue, (or very few issues), otherwise divisions will occur. Other issues are pointless anyway unless the money influence is removed. .

[-] 2 points by nobnot (529) from Kapaa, HI 12 years ago

Another Great job this evening by Occupy Oakland!

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

have you ever personally tried to warn the government, sent messages, or told them about problems that need addressing? I have and to no avail. Unless its all over the news, they could care less.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

No, I thought I was part of the government until recently. lol i don't understand why it's not all over the news, but you're right, unless it is, they could care less.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

we could be a part of the government, if i had my way id invite every american to vote on every issue using the internet, this wasnt possible during the early formation of congressmen, but it sure is today.

[-] 0 points by SteveKJR (-497) 12 years ago

So have I and have yet to receive a reply. Well I did receive one reply from a congressmen here in Georgia when I wrote him about more oil exploration, more nuclear plants to prepare for the future.

He said he would look into it but has yet to decide on the matter.

[-] 1 points by zoom6000 (430) from St Petersburg, FL 12 years ago

They will take them little more time to understand the whole picture i would say education them,Also those honst people they never been out side country or there county they live in very close circle of friends

[-] 1 points by Opportunity (19) 12 years ago

Seeing some of the issues Tea Party supports, there is a sharp disconnect in interests between OWS and the Tea Party. It is unlikely both movements will ever get along.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

That is exactly what it boils down to.

[-] 1 points by WatTyler (263) 12 years ago

"They will be very helpful when they wake up "

And very angry I suspect. But as long as the movement is being steered by libertarian Ideologues and funded by the Koch brothers, I see little mutuality of interest.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

Our mutual interest is to include everyone that's part of the 99%, and that includes them. Yes, they will be angry and that's a good thing.

[-] 0 points by flamingliberal (138) 12 years ago

teapartiers are racist they hate the poor and the sick fuck them.

[-] 0 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

I have known people for many years that currently identify with the tea party. None of them are racist nor do they hate the poor and sick. My hopes that when they wake up they will find friendly people here are dwindling..

[-] 0 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Convince them that their interests lie with us, not with the libertarians.

[-] 2 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

The interests of the libertarians lie with us as well. Our interests need to be unified to succeed against the 1%.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Can you tell me what interests of theirs would be mine as an OWS supporter? You would need to convince me, as well. And, I'm not yet convinced.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

They still believe in our government, so they strive to solve our country's problems through traditional methods. Their interests would be similar to yours if they knew the things you know. When they wake up and learn they will be very helpful. It will shatter their strong beliefs that our government is good, and they will be angry and ashamed.

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I don't think Tea Partiers believe in our government. They hate government. And, their methods are not traditional. The U.S. now pays a higher interest rate on its debt due to their shenanigans that ultimately led to the S&P downgrade.

[-] -1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

Remember that Tea Party leaders are not the same as the individual members, many of whom I have been friends with for many years. The traditional methods to them is to strive for improving government because they are not yet aware it's broken.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I don't see that. But, if what you say is true, then maybe there is hope.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

When they wake up, i hope they find forgiving people eager to join them establishing equality by together insisting that money not be allowed to influence elections and government.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I'll agree with you there. I think we can all come together on getting money out of politics. We must.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

Yep, all other time spent debating other issues is pointless until it's done.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

You are right.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

I'm sorry. This is a group that wants to privatize social security among other things. I refuse to align myself with them.

[-] 3 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

I don't agree with privatizing SS either. However, we will need to be inclusive of all groups that can help us remove the money influence from our political process. If we accomplish that first, having a debate on SS will actually mean something. If money influence is still allowed, debating SS is pointless.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

No, You be inclusive. I am not going to.

There is nothing in their political stance that is anywhere close to pro people. The people that they have helped elect are not operating for the people. In fact, they support them still. So, you may be willing to compromise your values. I will not.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

You could be inclusive without compromising your values. Until you agree to be inclusive, you will hinder our cause. They are doing what they're doing because they are ignorant of things you are aware of, your choice to not be inclusive is just as wrong.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

No, you can be inclusive.

My choice is thus: I actually work with different populations that they are hell bent on screwing over. I am not allowed the privilege of standing back and saying, "Golly, they just don't understand and I'm sure that if they were educated then they would see the light."

If you find some that are open to it, that is awesome. My choice represents that which is occurring as we speak. It constitutes right action.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

You embrace them. Im not a snake handler

[-] 0 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

I know them and they are not snakes. They are part of the 99%. When they awaken, I hope they find friendly people.

[-] 1 points by freehorseman (267) from Miles City, Mt 12 years ago

They awake son.and know what they do. Evil as ol Devil himself.

[-] 0 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

I apologize for not making it clear that I know them personally. For you to say they're evil tells me that you are asleep in a different way.

[-] 3 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 12 years ago

Sorry, they may be OK personaly, but they support Palin, Bachman, Scott Brown and Ercic Cantor. What they support by way of policy is evil. The representatives they put into office are for destroying the EPA, the Education Department, regulations that keep us safe, and the like. Their tying congress into knots helped downgrade America's creditworthiness. And their biggest legislative push was to stop energy efficient light bulbs. Do you remember them screaming about death panels? Do you know they have been funded by Stormfront and are aligned with White suprematist groups in the Southeast?

Yes,they are angry as OWS but they are angry at the wrong things for VERY wrong reasons. All they want is lower taxes. That's why they call themselves the Tea Party: it is a reference to the tax revolt. They don't understand, or seem to care, what those taxes do in terms of alleviating hunger or poverty.

Their agenda is the most right wing I have seen since McCarthy. Only these false patriots are "real Americans" as far as their spokesmen are concerned.

Welcome them? I wish they would just sit down and shut up.

[-] 1 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 12 years ago

They are asleep and do not realize that they are supporting evil policies. They are almost completely focused on forcing the government to stop spending more and more money. As in my original post, they believe so strongly in America, they are ignorant of the evils and need to wake up!

They're only false patriots because they aren't aware. When they become aware, they will be a tremendous help to our cause.

[-] -1 points by TimMcGraw (50) 12 years ago

I'm thankful for OWS, it pushed me from being independent to being a Republican. Romney will get this mess cleaned up.