Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Science of Climate Change

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 15, 2011, 11:44 p.m. EST by Shamus27 (84)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

For the skeptics:

http://www.americanprogress.org/events/2010/02/climatescience.html/#presentations

6 Comments

6 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by steve005 (256) from Cincinnati, OH 13 years ago

BS.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 1 points by atki4564 (1259) from Lake Placid, FL 13 years ago

There is an immediate solution to global warming. For example, the 99%, as Home Town Banks of 65,000 Members, can divide themselves into 16,384 Vehicle Investment Groups of 4 Members, with each group of 4 Members purchasing a hybrid-diesel-hummer-limo Cab which they then put into their Town Cab Fleet of 16,384 Cabs. Why? Because this would reduce their Individual Transportation Costs by 75% (Cost of 1 Cab / 4 Members = 75% less cost per member), and yet they would have a Luxury Limo Cab available to them, out of 16,000 cabs in their Town, five minutes after calling for one, but not necessarily the specific luxury cab in which they own 25%. And most importantly, let's not forget the lessening of Mother Nature's burden from having 75% fewer cars with no traffic jams, and thus 75% less CO2. Furthermore, the list of simple productivity improvements like this one -- which the 99% want but the 1% don't want -- are endless. But first, the 99% must control the banks as Bank Owner-Voters before they can control their Town (and National) design in this manner which is less costly (in terms of the worker hours to maintain it by 75% too) and yet have 75% greater luxury (such as a limo cab) at the same time. Consequently, to decentralize banking into a Focused Direct Democracy by Occupation & Generation is to lower cost 75% is to lower price 75% is to lower work 75%. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

For more info, join: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/StrategicInternationalSystems

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 1 points by SanityScribe (452) 13 years ago

For the other skeptics:

http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/index.shtml

The plan is there if you can read it. You also may have to able to decipher how what they say here is being put into place. Don't be lead by other peoples' influence. Go to the source of where global warming started.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 1 points by Shamus27 (84) 13 years ago

So you read the print and watched the > 1 hour clip in all of 6 minutes and then you say something so profound as BS.

Constructive?

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 1 points by reunitepangea (3) 13 years ago

climate realists dont like science, too hard to understand.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 1 points by Shamus27 (84) 13 years ago

Right, did you notice he is from "The Speakers" district?

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply