Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: the economic bill of rights

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 19, 2011, 7:16 a.m. EST by butterflyprincess37 (45) from Fort Collins, CO
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Excerpt from President Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union:

“It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[2] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.

For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

16 Comments

16 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by antipolitics (127) 13 years ago

yes, can we have this?

[-] 1 points by Cerberus (2) from Sainte-Catherine, QC 13 years ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Canada

What America must do.

The Bank of Canada (French: Banque du Canada) is Canada's central bank and "lender of last resort".[1] The Bank was created by an Act of Parliament (the Bank of Canada Act)[2] on July 3, 1934 as a privately owned corporation. In 1938, the Bank became a Crown corporation belonging to the Government of Canada.[3] The Minister of Finance (on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada) holds the entire share capital issued by the Bank. "Ultimately, the Bank is owned by the people of Canada."[4] The role of the Bank is to "promote the economic and financial well-being of Canada."[5

[-] 1 points by Yepper (277) 13 years ago

WE already have these rights BUT they are not free. Are you suggesting that all this should be FREE? This is getting silly.

[-] 1 points by Old1 (47) from Las Cruces, NM 13 years ago

good reference and while while a good credo, none of these is guaranteed by the Constitution; only the right to "pursue happiness" is. here is an excerpt from an article on this topic at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2848856

"Following FDR’s death in 1945, his wife, Eleanor, led the effort towards international acceptance of numerous elements of FDR’s Second Bill of Rights, incorporated into the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. These rights were then expanded further by The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, which was ratified by 142 nations as of 2003. Paradoxically, the United States, where the Second Bill of Rights originated, has not yet signed that Covenant.

Furthermore, the commitment to economic and social rights throughout the world is manifested by their inclusion in the constitutions of numerous countries. And the European Social Charter, signed by 24 European countries, establishes such rights as the right to work for fair remuneration, health care and social security."

[-] 1 points by TechJunkie (3029) from Miami Beach, FL 13 years ago

This all sounds great. Getting stuff for free is always awesome. But let's get specific.

"The right of every family to a decent home;"

Who is supposed to pay for all of this real estate? Should we just finance all of it?

How about:

"The right to a good education."

Who is supposed to pay for that? Again, more financing? More debt?

[-] 1 points by butterflyprincess37 (45) from Fort Collins, CO 13 years ago

who pays for wars that do nothing to enhance our security. somehow, I think that money could be put to better use. we spent billions bailing out banks. that money could have been used better as well. we wouldn't need to go further into debt if we would spend our money better in the first place.

I don't think FDR had in mind people get homes for free, but that they be priced reasonably so people could afford one.

[-] 1 points by metapolitik (1110) 13 years ago

......+1