Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Coup of Cowards

Posted 12 years ago on May 22, 2012, 12:52 p.m. EST by richardkentgates (3269)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Renneye (3874) 12 years ago

Hi rkg, this shows that a high judge has clear concerns regarding NDAA by halting the progress of the Federal Gov. in its rush to finalize its passing of NDAA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5FaKc7Z_uM&amp

[-] 1 points by OccNoVi (415) 12 years ago

Here's the link:

http://occupywallst.org/forum/mary-jo-kopechne-and-leola-anderson-rest-iin-peace

R-money and his team claim that the other driver in his fatal accident was "drunk," "driving 130 kph," failed to get back in after passing a truck, and crossed over the center line. In all versions that they tell, R-money was hit by the other car.

But a photo has been found of both cars when they were towed in. The flimsy Citroen DS and the parish Mercedes 180. (Yes, the other driver was a priest, Monseigneur Albert Marie, now deceased.)

The accident was straight head-on. But the damage was moderate, not much more than a fender bender. The Citroen DS was notoriously flimsy. These cars disintegrated in serous accidents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7ggwKkEpPA

The two cars' hoods were bent and the front ends were pushed back to the engines -- that's all. This was an accident with one car moving, not both of them, and at a speed of approximately 60 kph. Plan's in the works to do a MythBusters redo on this accident. (If the Mercedes had been going 130 kph/70 mph that Citroen DS would have flown into pieces.)

Photos at Occupy Security page on Facebook.

Mrs. Leola Anderson was killed because she had no seat belt. She had been crammed into the back seat with three other people. This was 1968, about 20 years prior to general use of air bags.

The story blaming the priest was invented after he passed away. It is politically useful. Still, the accident damage indicates that R-money hit the Mercedes 180 as it sat still waiting to come out into an intersection at a branch in the road.

This is worse than Chappaquiddick. Ted Kennedy owned up to his responsibility.

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

I am current on that issue. However, my page is not to articulate the activity on specifics but rather to expose a trend of pervasive and methodical militarization of our country. These trends although they do not guarantee the formation of a dictatorship or authoritarian takeover of a country, these symptoms always precede such. Aside from the fact that it's just down right un-American.

[-] 0 points by GaryAutumn (2) 12 years ago

When do you estimate that FEMA camps will become operational?

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

Asking to add other issues will require the same that is provided for the existing topics.

 1.News
 Current news regarding the issue. Reputable sources only.

 2.Legislation
 The bill, Executive Order, or law that enacts and/or enforces the policy.

 3.Practice
 Evidence of the execution of the policy.
[-] 0 points by GaryAutumn (2) 12 years ago

By your estimate, from the news you have read and the legislations you have read, when do you think FEMA camps will become operational?

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

While my post is provocative, I in no way intend to entertain paranoia or baseless web-gossip. The undermining of our constitutional rights and protections such as habeas corpus is quite a leap in the direction of the militarization of our country and this runs counter to the spirit and letter of our constitution. There have been a repeal of such laws as the Insurrection Act and the making meaningless of the War Powers Act that leave the bill of rights meaningless and allow the president to unilaterally order the assassination of individuals around the globe, something also forbidden by the Geneva Convention. Try to blur the line with your bullshit as you may, it has little effect on the people that would actually care to read the post out of genuine interest.