Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Some Rules of Moral Hazard, or Truth or Consequences:

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 8, 2011, 12:16 p.m. EST by BabeInWoods99 (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

My Rules of Moral Hazard, or Truth or Consequences:

  1. Banks may not own investment houses. (Reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act)

  2. Government should ensure credit can move freely through the economy; Government should not bailout creditors.

  3. Government should rescue banking systems; Government should not rescue banks or credit unions, nor provide 100%, or even 80% coverage of bad risk (haircut rule).

  4. Failure belongs to the bond & shareholders who take risks with their own money; Govt should not put the burden of failure (risky gambles) on taxpayers.

  5. Banks and investment houses must disclose to investors all positions they hold with respect to insurance, derivatives, and any new forms of instruments of investment and insurance that may arise, that bet against the investors position.

  6. Mortgage lenders will verify income of buyers; if any documents (pay stubs or mortgage papers) are falsified, the mortgage company will pay off the full amount of the mortgage. (Truth in Mortgage Lending Rule)

  7. All mortgage papers must be signed and reviewed by a human; "Robo-signing is prohibited.

  8. The buyer(s) will receive a copy of all mortgage papers.

  9. If the housing sector heats up to the extent that mortgage papers are not reviewed, the mortgage company, credit union, or bank that owns the paper will pay off the full amount of the mortgage in the event of a default by the home owner.

  10. No home may be seized, nor homeowner dispossessed of property by local sheriffs or other law enforcement agents without the mortgage papers being presented.

Please feel free to add to these, but keep the language simple. The Grifters/Bankers aren't all that smart.

4 Comments

4 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by margaritac (45) 13 years ago

Amen!

See, this is where most on both sides agree. THIS is where the focus needs to be. On a populace who is frustrated by the corruption. Very different from "You're rich and that's not fair!" Because that is what I hear when I I hear from many in this group.

[-] 1 points by touchit (126) 13 years ago

reasonable

[-] 1 points by captaindoody (339) from Elizabethville, PA 13 years ago
  1. A free mansion for me filled with 1000 servants
  2. A fleet of jets for me like that fat ugly bitch who owns ketchup
  3. Two Ferrari cars. One must have rims. The other is for this nurse friend of mine from another thread who asked for one.
  4. A bitchin' Camero with an epic stereo system.
  5. A pink shirt and feather boa for pissedoffconstructionworker.
  6. Free college for me.

Also, we should make all the bankers wear monocles and pinstriped suits so we can identify and scapegoat them easier. It would be just like we did in ancient WW2 times with the star of David, only much more fashionable. Retro is in right now.

[-] 1 points by kingearl (141) 13 years ago

Obamas' 2012 Re-election Finance Director is the son of BANK OF AMERICAS former CEO Charles K. Gifford.... the guy who got us in this mess!!! Keeping it all in the Family