Forum Post: Solidarity to Dignity5

One of the most problematic aspects of the "INDIGNADOS" demonstrations is their inability to conceive and interpret properly the current social structure with which they face. If you ask the protesters what is the root of the malfunction of society the most common answer you hear is corporate greed or that everything is the fault of greed of the 1% of society, the elite. But greed, however, is not owned or a condition of any kind mode of production. You can find greed anywhere. Unlimited greed for gain is not in the least identical with capitalism, and is still less its spirit. But capitalism is identical with the pursuit of profit, and with forever renewed profit, by means of continuous rational of capitalistic enterprise. Capitalism is not a moral but rather a structural problem. The logic of capitalist accumulation demands that money value be ceaselessly thrown back into the circuit of production and circulation. Not the 99% or even the highest 1% populace can afford to act outside this logic. We are all slaves of a ruthless, mechanistic and linear Darwinian economic system whose laws of the human jungle, without moral laws that have now replacing even the same capitalist industrial production, supplanting all with a new phenomenon, called the financial and speculative capital that as Divinity Absolute has overpassed the man and his institutions, to impose the blind acceptance of a policy based on the money by the money and the survival of the fittest in this case of the richest. This process of "natural selection" has unleashed a vicious form of "freedom for all”, an atmosphere in which your best friend could be your worst enemy, if the gain and profit is the name of the game. To better understand the racial profile of Darwinism is only necessary to refer to the original title of Darwin's book which is "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life." Taken to its full implementation, we can say that the Darwinian Theory became the science of state approval and mission of Nazi Germany, and today’s guilty of ideological moral disaster of the current state of things. We recognize the importance and validity of Darwin's discoveries. Knowing that not only him but his contemporary naturalist Wallace, explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist, recognized that evolution was due to the elimination of the weakest. They interpreted the data in the sense that evolution is the result of the inherent will to survive the fittest. However, Darwin emphasized competition between individuals of the same species to survive and reproduce, whereas Wallace emphasized environmental pressures on varieties and species to force them to adapt to their local environment. In conclusion the difference between Darwin and Wallace is that in a Wallacean world, we better not to be the weakest, but in the Darwinian world, we struggle to acquire the status of being the best. In other words, Wallace pays less attention to competition than to cooperation. But what happens if the cooperation and sharing are the only reason for our evolution? What if survival really depends on how well we communicate with each other and how quickly we can share, process and understand this information? Surely a solid understanding of how our ways of genetic and epigenetic programming affect our biological and psychological life skills made us able to get the programming change that we need to rewrite our destiny. Perhaps the next stretch of our imagination will be the appearance of an emergent human culture, scarcely predictable by the way people act and interact now, that will allow humans to survive and cooperatively thrive at a new level of complexity.