Forum Post: Romney will lose in the biggest landslide defeat in American history

okay, okay, I know what you're thinking some crazy liberal lunatic is jumping off the deep end and boastfully making some wild claim that will never really happen.

But once my prediction comes true you will call me the great Maharishi , the guru of this movement.{Okay maybe not, just having a little fun here}.

This is going to get a bit long so just bear with me. If you remember I referred to this election as mirroring the 1936 election. If you recall FDR won this election in a landslide. In a landslide but that is not the real news about the 36 election.The real news about this election was that the polls got the election completely wrong as they are doing now. Back then there was a poling magazine known as the literary Digest poll, this poll had predicted correctly the past five presidential elections..

Compared to today, they used a very crude method of polling. They mailed out 10 million questionnaires and received 2.3 million responses. The responses were overwhelmingly anti-Roosevelt as compared to those that were pro-Roosevelt{Sound familiar,like the polls today are using most likely voters to show who's leading other than just registered voters whom they are discounting}. Prediction, Alf Landon, winner with 370 electorial votes. It seems that the more fervent anti-Roosevelts were the only ones who mailed in their questionnaire.It was a complete embarrassment and the poll soon closed never to be heard from again.

Oh but wait it gets much much worse from here. If you will go to Latino decisions.com and read"How the polls are missing the Latino vote". You'll find that pollsters are heavily underestimating the Latino vote. They are using a very small samples and are not using the Hispanic population as compared to the state. Gallup just calls voters daily and asks who you are voting for? The only problem with this method is they are only conducting these polls.in English. If you are Hispanic and English is your second language you are just going to hang up. And Hispanics are supporting Obama 3 to 1. According to this magazine. Now I'm not going to get into the rest of the my minutia of this article but I think you get the point.

This was proven to be the case in 2010 when the poll showed Sharron Angle beating Harry Reid by two is three points.. Then Reid surprisingly won the election by five points.. Right now a prominent Poll is showing Romney leading Obama49% to 46% among Hispanics in Florida.. Really?{the 7-Eleven cup polls seems to be more accurate when it shows Obama beating Romney 10 to 1 then gallop and the other scientific polls.}.

Well, it turns out that they have only polled 130 English-speaking Hispanics and when you add in the non-polled Latinos, even Drudge gives Obama a six-point shadow advantage. Now we already know that Romney will literally get 0% of the black vote and this was also given as another reason for Alf Landon's huge defeat in 36. I am also going to give you another little jewel that Gallup is totally discounting. The third-party vote.

In Ohio, polls show the campaign tied.

Romney 47%

Obama 47%

But when you had another choice to the polls shows.

Obama 47%

Romney 44%

Other choice 3%

So this is why I am predicting the worst and most humiliating defeat in Republican history. And I cannot help but think that when it shows most senatorial races tied. These factors are only going to bleed over into the house and senate races. Do you really think that all these voters are going to vote Republican in the down races? But, in the end, all these opinions and all my great predictions might just give me a free cup of coffee at Starbucks.