Forum Post: Restructuring the global social/economic structure
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 30, 2011, 4:41 a.m. EST by Diplomacy4Evry1
(123)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Today we live in a global society structure that runs like a complex machine, a clockwork; analogous even to an organism. A system of complex networks of communication, transport, cultivation, distribution of resources, etc. This system was devised some time ago for the benefit of mankind. It worked well, insofar as it's ability to raise the standards of living for a portion of the human population. Industry has bequeathed on us, both salvation from the unrelenting struggle for survival for some, as well as a life indistinguishable from slavery, wrought with poverty for others. So why should I care? If I don't belong to the latter group. One reason might be because, if we use the analogy of an organism, efficiency and effectiveness require that the system as a whole regard it's individual parts equally in order to perform at it's full capacity or potential. Take a cheetah for instance, if the internal structure of the organism was fighting with itself for resources, and say, the muscles won the fight over the lungs for extra food, we would be left with an organism unable to perform because its muscles expanded while reducing the lung capacity to provide enough oxygen. Hence an organism that, overall, performed worse than the one we started with. This simple example illustrates how human society, as a whole, operates much like an organism and is therefore subject to the same parameters required for survival. If we expect human 'society' to survive, we are forced to recognize the requirements this survival depends on. Now, a paradigm-shift. Just as single-celled organisms evolved from individual survival tactics, to community structures for mutual benefit and protection, (all the while competing with eachother), to a miraculous transition - they discovered a way of networking communication across vast numbers of themselves and in it, discovered a sense of unity that bore the first emergence of a multi-celled organism. We as humans are now at the stage where we get to decide; do we unite, and together become something greater than any individual can achieve, or do we fall prey to competition, devouring everything in our path, including our competitors?
A Proposal How do we take what we have and make it something we "All" can, more or less, happily live with? Perhaps the time has come for the next major transition in the development in human civilizations. We have the opportunity, if we stand together, to put an end to poverty, an end to hunger, and most importantly an end to the blatant disregard for human liberty and the environmental disposition of our planet. What I propose is to re-create our system of government and not simply to change policy or elected officials. The Occupy Wall Street movement is giving us a unique opportunity to make changes far greater than any protest has ever bestowed upon us. What we can achieve through a global coalition of protesters can mark history with a point where our grandchildren will look in their history books to this day and say, "this is how our world was saved. This is a testament to the courage and conviction of our ancestors that brought equality, liberty and justice to us all." This is my aim. This is my goal. I personally believe In the human race. I know we are all individually different yet believe we share more similarities than differences. If we work together, if we work for each other, we will wake to the day when the single-celled individual human being stops competing with its fellow individuals and unite to form the first emergence of the multi-celled united human race.
That's a great place to start. I'd also add, a revised structure for education.
What do 'You' think?
Let's begin building the foundation of global democracy by eradicating the disfunction of the monetary system
That's a great place to start. I'd also add, a revised structure for education.
Specifically: The idea that anyone like you would have access (by law) to anything that I have worked for and earned myself. The thought that I owe you anything just because I am financially successful (by way of honest gains) and you are not. The concept that there will someday be no poverty or hunger anywhere on this planet through human effort.
"Take a cheetah for instance"....that is freaking hilarious.
First off, why would you assume I'm not successful? I have a solid career that pays me well. My issues don't have anything to do with my personal welfare. It's about treating all humans with respect and dignity - it's about the blatant disregard for universal human rights and the environmental disposition of our planet. What I'm trying to accomplish won't take anything away from you. In fact, you would actually get more - more freedom; an easier existence based on your preferences. I'm well educated and my strategies are well thought out. I simply don't have the space to write a detailed description but instead summarize.
And, you obviously didn't take the time to understand my analogy using a cheetah, because it fits the bill perfectly.
Whether you are successful or not is not the point. The point is that I should be able to keep what I earn and you should too. I should not be forced to pay for your stuff and you should not be forced to pay for mine. To me, freedom from confiscation of wealth is a huge component of respect and dignity. Such freedom is a universal human right in my mind.
I agree 100%. I don't exactly draw the whole structure out because it requires more writing than is allowed in a post. So let me clarify. In transitioning our society to the society I portray, everyone keeps what they have. I don't care how many palaces the Rothchild's have, they can keep them all. Given that no one's possessions or wealth is taken, what actually happens is a movement towards universal education, employing everyone - reducing the hours people need to work, expanding the automation industry which will open more jobs temporarily as more menial jobs are automated - freeing people for chores no human wants to endeavor, expanding recycling programs to the point that we recycle everything we can - which reduces our need to extract more resources. Eventually we would be living in a world where people voluntarily do their societal chores, ie.work, because their part in providing for humanity ensures humanity provides for them. It's basically taking the idea of how businesses have people all working together to achieve a common goal and applying it to the entire human race.
I'd like to revise the structure of your brain.
What specifically, do you disagree with?