Forum Post: Remarks on your current list of demands
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 4, 2011, 3:25 a.m. EST by Kooch
(77)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
My comments toward the list of demands are in brackets. I think you're doing very well, so far!
LIST OF PROPOSED "DEMANDS FOR CONGRESS"
1.
CONGRESS PASS HR 1489 ("RETURN TO PRUDENT BANKING ACT" <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1489> ). THIS REINSTATES MANY PROVISIONS OF THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT.
[While I completely understand the idea, this one is unnecessary if you strike at the root: the need for monetary reform. End the fractional reserve lending system that creates over 99% of the currency (or at least ratchet down to a reasonable level no more than 4:1). This is the banksters's primary power. Without it Glass-Steagall is not needed.]
2.
USE CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE FEDERAL AGENCIES FULLY INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE THE WALL STREET CRIMINALS
[Spot on. Yes, indeed.]
3.
CONGRESS ENACT LEGISLATION TO PROTECT OUR DEMOCRACY BY REVERSING THE EFFECTS OF THE CITIZENS UNITED SUPREME COURT DECISION RE-ESTABLISH THE PUBLIC AIRWAVES IN THE U.S. SO THAT POLITICAL CANDIDATES ARE GIVEN EQUAL TIME FOR FREE AT REASONABLE INTERVALS IN DAILY PROGRAMMING DURING CAMPAIGN SEASON.
[Yes--however, in number 8 you address most of this anyway. But correct, of course.]
4.
CONGRESS PASS THE BUFFETT RULE ON FAIR TAXATION SO THE RICH AND CORPORATIONS PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE & CLOSE CORPORATE TAX LOOP HOLES AND ENACT A PROHIBITION ON HIDING FUNDS OFF SHORE.
[Whether or not this tax is a good idea, making it a part of a revolutionary movement is not a good idea. Change the system. Then start looking at how to pay for it. Besides, in this proposal you tip your hand and show yourselves to be led mainly by partisans on the so-called "left". This proposal brings you shame.]
5.
CONGRESS COMPLETELY REVAMP THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and staff it at all levels with proven professionals who get the job done protecting the integrity of the marketplace
[Yes!]
6.
CONGRESS PASS SPECIFIC AND EFFECTIVE LAWS LIMITING THE INFLUENCE OF LOBBYISTS AND ELIMINATING THE PRACTICE OF LOBBYISTS WRITING LEGISLATION THAT ENDS UP ON THE FLOOR OF CONGRESS.
[Yes, with caveat: must be written to do what you intend while not stifling speech of organized groups.]
7.
CONGRESS PASSING "Revolving Door Legislation" LEGISLATION ELIMINATING THE ABILITY OF FORMER GOVERNMENT REGULATORS GOING TO WORK FOR CORPORATIONS THAT THEY ONCE REGULATED.
[Indeed.]
8.
ELIMINATE "PERSONHOOD" LEGAL STATUS FOR CORPORATIONS. The film "The Corporation" has a great section on how corporations won "personhood status". <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SuUzmqBewg> . Fast-forward to 2:20. It'll blow your mind. The 14th amendment was supposed to give equal rights to African Americans.
[Yes! Yes! And this negates the need for number 3 minus the media part. Santa Clara County Vs. Southern Pacific Railroad was decided and falsely reported in the record as giving "personhood" to corporations. This is/was wrong.]
Not bad for a start. I'm only truly against #3, and really on the grounds that it hurts your movement by painting a partisan stripe on you.
The main thing you're missing:
Monetary reform. I know you hear cries to "End The Fed". But the truth is greater than The Fed's mis-dealings and insider knowledge/manipulations that cause and let the oligarchs profit from the bubbles. The greater truth is this: There should be no such thing as a "National Debt". Why does a supposedly sovereign nation borrow money when it has the ability to create it on its own? It's been done before (England's tally sticks, Rome's low-grade metal currency, Lincoln's greenbacks during the Civil War) and is still done today (island of Guernsey). If you end the fractional reserve practice (or severely limit and let the spoils go to The People), you will have cut the banksters' power at the source. The source of heir power is that they issue the currency every time you, I, or the government take out a loan. At least this should not be the case with government! NO MORE NATIONAL DEBT!
Whether you usually agree with Dennis Kucinich or not, you should check out his NEED Act. It is not completely perfect (he has the money power under the executive, whereas it should be separate from the other branches....but maybe Dennis was feeling shy about actually proposing the need for a new 4th branch of government), however besides that, he has the deal right: Ratchet up reserve requirements. Take the currency-issuing power back. Let the government be creative with using that power for the betterment of society. Tax only to extract money from the system to ward off inflation.
Corporate Free Speech There needs to be better corporate representation. Money is speech. Every individual, even individual stockholders, "ownership," has a right to free speech. Free speech means no one can force or prevent an individual's speech. Ownership has the right to direct the corporation's speech and political contributions. Majority control of contributions may violate an individual's free speech. Corporate management can speech for the corporation, but ownership needs to authorize that speech. No speech or money spent on political contributions may be made without ownership authorization and such contributions must be taken from the individual's dividends. No dividends means there is no allowance for contributions. Corporate management must poll the ownership to determine the amount and placement of all individual stockholder directed contributions. The assignment of all corporate contributions must be made public so that ownership can verify the correct placement of their contributions. Management can not make contributions on the behalf of nonresponsive ownership and thus can only make contributions for which they have been directly authorized.
Money is speech. Corporations are people, because people get the money. Free speech means people are not forced to pay for someone else's speech. Corporations may not force to pay or deny dividends, to a person who does not approve of money spent on speech. Corporations may only spend money on speech that is taken, by approval, from the people who get the money. Every person who gets money, from the corporation, must approve the money spent on speech, in order to protect the right to free speech. Since the money spent on speech is identifiable with a person then that money is subject to caps associated with that person and must be reported. Also, tax consequences flow, to each person, for tax exempt contributions. If the corporation feels that the cost of polling and reporting the money spent on speech is prohibitive, then the corporation is prohibited from spending on speech. Corporations spend money on product ads and any political placement in a product ad must have unanimous consent of ownership.
I think the movement needs a coherent and reasonable list of demands. We are where we are from a systematic destruction of safeguards installed by Roosevelt during and after the Great Depression. All US citizens should watch the documentary "Inside Job". Not buying stuff hurts US blue collar as much as it does white collar, other than the goods that are manufactured (which admittedly we import a lot of goods; seems like most, but I am told that America is still the world’s largest manufacturer). This movement needs to take on epic proportion - and result in a wholesale change in congress or member support of the movement, because as we all know, they are currently owned by the super wealthy. The control of congress by Lobbyist is complete; we need a game changer. I submit the following list for consideration:
I think the movement needs a coherent and reasonable list of demands. We are where we are from a systematic destruction of safeguards installed by Roosevelt during and after the Great Depression. All US citizens should watch the documentary "Inside Job". Not buying stuff hurts US blue collar as much as it does white collar, other than the goods that are manufactured (which admittedly we import a lot of goods; seems like most, but I am told that America is still the world’s largest manufacturer). This movement needs to take on epic proportion - and result in a wholesale change in congress or member support of the movement, because as we all know, they are currently owned by the super wealthy. The control of congress by Lobbyist is complete; we need a game changer. I submit the following list for consideration:
I think the movement needs a coherent and reasonable list of demands. We are where we are from a systematic destruction of safeguards installed by Roosevelt during and after the Great Depression. All US citizens should watch the documentary "Inside Job". Not buying stuff hurts US blue collar as much as it does white collar, other than the goods that are manufactured (which admittedly we import a lot of goods; seems like most, but I am told that America is still the world’s largest manufacturer). This movement needs to take on epic proportion - and result in a wholesale change in congress or member support of the movement, because as we all know, they are currently owned by the super wealthy. The control of congress by Lobbyist is complete; we need a game changer. I submit the following list for consideration:
You have some good points that are definitely something to stand up for .I want to share this form with you .
Please put the word out .
If you fill this out you will get a response back I have used it in the past to get help .
http://housingforvietnamvets.blogspot.com/
Click the link above the video where it says write congress here .
This form works. Bombard Comgress with letters .
Also the second link is to file a Informa Pauperis which can be filed out which will allow you make your complaint heard in the courts .It will not work without support the courts passed laws a few years ago that can give them the right to not hear your voice but with support they will not deny you .It will not take hundreds of millions of dollars which many movements in the past have needed .
See we can protest all we want ,we can never defeat the ruling classes without love if we come with hate we will lose at this current moment .But if people work together to go to court laws will change .It will take more than media power and protest to change this situation .Eventually the numbers will grow perhaps in the millions for a change of this current system but without going through the proper channels i,e the court this may be just like the protest of the 70s .
Peace Man