Forum Post: OWS should split
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 11, 2011, 9:24 p.m. EST by ronimacarroni
(1089)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I think ows got its point across.
I think it should split into different groups with concise objectives.
If you don't want to stick to a coherent message and you start disrupting people's lives you just end up looking like a load of punks.
Still its sad that a movement that was supposed to be a leaderless movement turn into what resembles a fascist movement.
I think "leaderless" should actually read "leader-ful"...so that what is clear is that anyone can lead a part of the movement. If you are compelled to create a group such as the ones you've outlined below... do it, but do it in solidarity and do it while being an excellent communicator. Don't just make a suggestion...organize a group. Life often calls on us to test our strengths.
It's like watching a dog chase a bus. What would it do with it after it caught it ?
Here's a suggestion: -One group for finance reform
-On group for taking money out of politics
-One group against the war
-One group for income inequality And so on
Anyways its probably going to happen regardless of what you guys think.
OWS is on a slippery slope.