Forum Post: One Demand From OWS. Encompasses All Others.
Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 14, 2011, 2:58 p.m. EST by OpenSky
(217)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
The political game is rigged. Two parties control the entire political system, but besides rhetoric, are they really all that different? Impossibly high barriers prevent third parties from every gaining ground in the election process. Namely, the fact that we have what is called a WINNER-TAKES-ALL SYSTEM. It basically means that whichever party/candidate gets a majority of the electoral votes in a state gets all of those votes. For example, California gets 55 electoral votes. If one party gets just 28 votes (which is barely a majority), all 55 votes count to that party/candidate in the general election. This effectively means that ANY VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY IS ALWAYS A WASTED VOTE. What we need is proportional representation (used in Europe, allows for more than one party to win, and they can form "coalitions" with each other if they wish). This would allow for a multitude of parties to flourish, effectively breaking the status quo of our stagnant political system and allowing for real, significant change. Additionally, a dynamic political system such as this would by its very nature SEVERELY LIMIT THE POWER CORPORATIONS HAVE OVER OUR POLITICAL PARTIES. As more factors define our election process, it gets exponentially more difficult for corporations to influence our government. Now naturally, nothing has ever been done by Congress to really institute this kind of reform, as it is obviously against the interests of the two parties to have their positions of power so radically altered. But I ask you this: How many times during an election do you vote for the LESSER OF TWO EVILS? How many times have you wanted to vote for an independent candidate, only to recoil at the prospect of a WASTED VOTE? The only way to win the game, is to change the rules! Bring about change by DEMANDING that congress institute political party reform... They say we don't have a defined goal. We do... To break the STATUS QUO. This single demand, by itself, could change everything.
This provides some good information on the third party and the barriers it faces: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_party_(United_States)
Increased number of representatives is the first step. In 1789, when the first congress sat there were 65 members of the house and 26 senators for a population of about 4 million, equalling one representative for about 50,000 citizens (eventhough blacks, women and men who didnt own property couldnt vote). Today there are 435 members of the house and 100 senators for a population of about 300 million, equalling one representative for about 500,000 citizens. This process of adding representatives hasnt changed since 1913 (beside the adding of new states of course). More representatives equal more direct contact with your representative which equalls more accountablity, more party diversity and a lesser amount of accumulated authority. In order to make the kool-aid drinkable, we need to dilute the sugar with more water...
Increased number of representatives is the first step. In 1789, when the first congress sat there were 65 members of the house and 26 senators for a population of about 4 million, equalling one representative for about 50,000 citizens (eventhough blacks, women and men who didnt own property couldnt vote). Today there are 435 members of the house and 100 senators for a population of about 300 million, equalling one representative for about 500,000 citizens. This process of adding representatives hasnt changed since 1913 (beside the adding of new states of course). More representatives equal more direct contact with your representative which equalls more accountablity, more party diversity and a lesser amount of accumulated authority. In order to make the kool-aid drinkable, we need to dilute the sugar with more water...