Forum Post: Oakland Police Officers issue respectful request for an end to the city's uniquely dangerous Occupy event
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 12, 2011, 8:39 a.m. EST by vets74
(344)
from New York, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Note that this is from the Oakland Police Officers’ Association. Not from the City or from the Police Department. No joke: it is supported 645 of 645.
Here's the text:
An Open Letter to the Citizens of Oakland from the Oakland Police Officers’ Association
1 November 2011 – Oakland, Ca.
We represent the 645 police officers who work hard every day to protect the citizens of Oakland. We, too, are the 99% fighting for better working conditions, fair treatment and the ability to provide a living for our children and families. We are severely understaffed with many City beats remaining unprotected by police during the day and evening hours.
As your police officers, we are confused.
On Tuesday, October 25th, we were ordered by Mayor Quan to clear out the encampments at Frank Ogawa Plaza and to keep protesters out of the Plaza. We performed the job that the Mayor’s Administration asked us to do, being fully aware that past protests in Oakland have resulted in rioting, violence and destruction of property.
Then, on Wednesday, October 26th, the Mayor allowed protesters back in – to camp out at the very place they were evacuated from the day before.
To add to the confusion, the Administration issued a memo on Friday, October 28th to all City workers in support of the “Stop Work” strike scheduled for Wednesday, giving all employees, except for police officers, permission to take the day off.
That’s hundreds of City workers encouraged to take off work to participate in the protest against “the establishment.” But aren’t the Mayor and her Administration part of the establishment they are paying City employees to protest? Is it the City’s intention to have City employees on both sides of a skirmish line?
It is all very confusing to us.
Meanwhile, a message has been sent to all police officers: Everyone, including those who have the day off, must show up for work on Wednesday. This is also being paid for by Oakland taxpayers. Last week’s events alone cost Oakland taxpayers over $1 million.
The Mayor and her Administration are beefing up police presence for Wednesday’s work strike they are encouraging and even “staffing,” spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars for additional police presence – at a time when the Mayor is also asking Oakland residents to vote on an $80 parcel tax to bail out the City’s failing finances.
All of these mixed messages are confusing.
We love Oakland and just want to do our jobs to protect Oakland residents. We respectfully ask the citizens of Oakland to join us in demanding that our City officials, including Mayor Quan, make sound decisions and take responsibility for these decisions. Oakland is struggling – we need real leaders NOW who will step up and lead – not send mixed messages. Thank you for listening.
I can't complain at any of that.
The riot the other night was not incited by OWS protesters. We have more going along with Oakland PD and the state and Fed agencies to get to the bottom of what happened with those masked gangs.
Plainly the murder indicated that protecting OWS protesters is not feasible in the current situation.
Oakland is unique.
No other Occupy site is seeing this type of violence. No riots. No killings. No large groups of masked provocateurs throwing bottles at police.
Shutting it down is a practical measure -- consistent with the principles of non-violence. The masked provocateurs have done their work, along with the gun man.
I like fighting another day. There's going to be a lots of days.
The problem I have with this is that while the OWS protesters can go home, the homeless people who have been attracted to or been pushed to go to the Occupy camps can't go home. Society has a problem here: the problem is that yes, whenever a lot of homeless people start piling up in one place, crime and disease become visible there. And the answer communities choose is always to attack them and try to drive them somewhere else. It's not right. I certainly can't tell anyone occupying the site that they have to stay, and certainly not when the danger is so close and so real, but I don't see the virtue in telling them to leave. It is a bad situation, and the people there who are behaving in a responsible, non-violent manner deserve our support whatever they decide to do.
Great comment. This is a responsibility that falls, in part, on Occupy sites.
One task at OWS NYC is to identify existing New York resources for the homeless.
Free food for the homeless is similar to feeding stray cats on my front porch -- I do it knowing that I'm now responsible for the cats. Winter is tough on half-wild kitties.
We need to see what is out there for homeless people. What happens when an Occupy site folds tent.
Oakland, however, is in a class all by itself. They've been targeted by gangs of vandals/arsonists who arrived with nunchuckas for breaking windows and incendiaries for starting fires. There's some 40 buildings with fire damage from those thugs.
And a murder.
"Bad situation" -- yes, indeed. The eviction papers have been served, so hopefully this situation will be resolved peacefully in the coming week.
Go back home...mommy has 'World of Warcraft" waiting for you in the basement.