Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Liberate Wall Street

Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 16, 2011, 8:12 p.m. EST by Wellington2 (13)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Enough! A call to action!
Liberate Wall Street from the occupation that threatens violence and other despicable acts. We must stand up for the nation and our way of life.
Drive the unlawful and un-enlighten occupiers out!

Shout them down where you can and drive them from the streets. Cut off their support and stand behind the Mayor and law enforcement. Enough of the harassment tactics and stupidity.

Push them back!

43 Comments

43 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by nichole (525) 13 years ago

Bear with us.

[-] 1 points by flashcards (39) 13 years ago

Lol you idiot, that is exactly what we are trying todo. It's just that the Mayor IS one of the Occupiers, has been his whole life. We seek to Liberate by our counter occupation. We also use less violence and have done less despicable deeds than the status quo.

[-] 1 points by guitarmywin (158) 13 years ago

Yes, Yes Liberate the bull from the shackles of Greed and unlawful acts.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

Um, or just let them be and avoid much of the 'violence and despicable acts' that your stupid plan will result in.

[-] -2 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

You can't be let be. You all have to go. You’re wasting everyone’s time and money. No! stop this Marxist cause and be gone.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago
  1. The cause is not necessarily Marxist

  2. Protests happen all the time. If we didn't have any, we'd still be the racist America that we were in the 50's and earlier.

[-] 0 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

Oh! So by pooping on police cars, raping female participants, destroying private property, assaulting cops and others, protesting without permits, stopping traffic, and falsely imprisoning and threatening opponents, the Civil Rights movement won popular public support and were able to win full rights and respect for minorities. Maybe I didn't have the same history book as you did in school.

[-] 1 points by buphiloman (840) 13 years ago

The Poisoned Well fallacy again...god you Fauxbots and GlennZombies just love that one.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

First, it's God you Fauxbots. And second tell me where I'm going wrong here. Did the Civil Rights protesters engage in any of this type of activity? To my knowledge, no, but then again I had a different history book in school.

[-] 1 points by buphiloman (840) 13 years ago

First only Fauxbots make the idiotic assumption that anything distasteful that happens within a 5 miles/10 hour radius of an OWS event must somehow be the fault of OWS (an assumption which is itself an instance of the "Ad hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy). Second, bringing up these events as though they were indicative of the Movement's "behaviour" is both the Poison Well fallacy, and a fallacy of Compostion.

Learn to think critically. there are colleges, sit in on a course.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

That's good, advice to think critically from a member of this movement. Learn to take constructive criticism. Or just continue thinking that you're right and everyone else is an idiot while the movement falters.

[-] 1 points by buphiloman (840) 13 years ago

what have you said that could be said to be "constructive criticism" w/o straining the very concept to the point of incoherence?

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

So the Civil Rights movement did all of those disgusting things and that's what made them successful? No, they didn't do them and that's what made them successful. This group doesn't seem to have any decency or self control, quite unlike the Civil Rights movement. Take it for what it's worth.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

You are only judging the minority of protesters.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

You're known by who you associate with. And the Civil Rights movement and leaders would never have tolerated this disgusting behavior. They were peaceful and respectable on their end, and let the horrid actions of their opponents win them the argument. While this movement continues with it's aggressive, violent and despicable behavior you are only winning the argument for your opponents.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

The movement is not necessarily aggressive, violent, and despicable. Most of the protestors here are peaceful.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

If you say so... That's just not what the rest of the 99% are seeing. We'll see what happens tomorrow!

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

The point I am trying to make is that the actual purpose of the protest is not to crap on cars and rape female participants. Judging the protests by that small minority of idiots is by no means a way of discrediting the actual purpose.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

But that's what's happening, despite and to the detriment of what the message is.

And while we're on it, what exactly is the message? I still have not been able to get a straight answer as to what the objective is. My guess from what ive heard and read is to change this from a capitalist to socialist country. Just let me know if I'm wrong.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

Not all protesters want to change from Capitalism to Socialism, some just want heavier economic regulation, more like a welfare state.

They are not necessarily against Capitalism, they often just dislike what has happened to it.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

I've get some news for you, heavier economic regulation like a welfare state is moving the economy more toward socialism and away from capitalism. So how is this movement not about socialism?

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

You are muddling Socialism and Leftism. The one category that this movement falls under is Leftism, not Socialism. Changing something more towards Socialism is not the same as changing to a Socialist country.

[-] 1 points by DudleyE (94) 13 years ago

And the difference between leftism and socialism is...?

Also you can change a country towards socialism until one day you wake up and find yourself living in a socialist country. We're almost there already!

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

We are not even close to 'there'. America is one of the most neoliberal countries in the world.

You said in an earlier post that the purpose of the movement is to move from a Capitalist to a Socialist country. You later said that the purpose is to move more towards Socialism. The two are not necessarily the same.

[-] -2 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

So the stuff I read on here that looks just like Marx's writing is not there? Surely your not comparing forgiving student loans to the civil rights movement.

I thought I had a big head.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

Note: NOT NECESSARILY Marxist

There are many Marxists on here. But there are many other people here too. The movement itself is not Marxist.

[-] 0 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

So what do you want other than to be freed from your chains. Sorry that's Lennon. No. not John.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

sigh

The people here do not necessarily conform to Marxist teachings. People who do not do so are not Marxists. Every religious person in the movement is not a Marxist; religious beliefs alone will shrink the number of Marxists to a minority.

I think you need to research into Marxism; it is spelled Lenin, not Lennon.

[-] 0 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

Ah Ha so you're a Leninist.

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

I am not a Leninist. I am a Democratic Socialist.

[-] 1 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

SO why do you know so much about him? Hmmmmmmmmmm. Ok Maoist?

[-] 1 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

Dude, what do you know so much about him? All I am saying is that you have no idea what you are talking about when you say that the OWS movement is Marxist.

Oh, and calling something Marxist is not supposed to discredit it.

[-] 1 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

It doesn't work and it leads to totalitarianism. So I'd say it not a go direction and there are a lot of Marxist sentiments on here.

[-] 0 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

OK, that is fine to say, although I do not agree with you. But calling the entire movement Marxist irrationally as a method for discrediting it is not OK.

[-] 0 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

Why not. I'm not for this movement. If I can point out the Marxist views and get my point across it's easier. beside I like labels.

[-] 0 points by Fraqtive42 (87) from Herndon, VA 13 years ago

You like labels, despite the fact that discrediting something by looking at the minority is a blatant logical fallacy? It is fine to be for or against the movement, but labeling things incorrectly is not a valid way of getting your point across.

[-] 0 points by flashcards (39) 13 years ago

Ok how does fascist sit with you. If you are trying to suppress the views of the people the label is Fascist. Print it out NICE and BIG and attach with a safety pin. Now walk with pride down the street wearing your self made badge of honor.

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 13 years ago

.. I suspect many support the movement from the safety of their homes. How will you find us all? By the way, what is it that you are fighting against? I thought the main critique is that there was no leadership, no demands, no direction. How could this possibly threaten your way of life?

[-] 2 points by ghostofbettermen (19) from Muncie, IN 13 years ago

Never assume you have safety in your own home and that they can't find you. The Jews did that once, ask them how it went.

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 13 years ago
[-] -2 points by Wellington2 (13) 13 years ago

No please stay home where you don't bother people.

[-] 1 points by PandoraK (1678) 13 years ago

I did stay home and by golly, you bothered me!

[-] 0 points by cubbins (3) 13 years ago

OWS protesters are misguided, lazy, and they're always looking to be the "victims". Well guess what, were all victims of life. Life isnt easy for anyone, so all you OWS protesters should go occupy a jail or get to work.