Forum Post: Jesus married a 1%er
Posted 12 years ago on March 24, 2012, 10:14 a.m. EST by VantagePoint250624
(-51)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
he wasn't a pauper.
Public Forum
0 comments 11 hours ago by agkaiser
1 comments 5 days ago by grapes
0 comments 1 week ago by agkaiser
0 comments 2 weeks ago by agkaiser
0 comments 2 weeks ago by agkaiser
0 comments 3 weeks ago by agkaiser
0 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
2 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
0 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
1 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
0 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
1 comments 1 month ago by agkaiser
0 comments 2 months ago by agkaiser
1 comments 3 months ago by agkaiser
0 comments 3 months ago by factsrfun
7 comments 3 months ago by factsrfun
4 comments 4 months ago by factsrfun
6 comments 4 months ago by factsrfun
4 comments 4 months ago by gsw
7 comments 4 months ago by factsrfun
3 comments 4 months ago by agkaiser
2 comments 5 months ago by agkaiser
1 comments 5 months ago by grapes
2 comments 5 months ago by agkaiser
Like moths to the flame, you all made the case for a false argument. Well done.
jesus married mary magdalene, she was a 1 percenter?
check out a video
lost tomb of jesus
www.jesusfamilytomb.com
Leave Jesus Christ alone. You probably know little about him.
What does it matter? Just about all philosophers and scientists up through at least the 18th century were wealthy.
[Removed]
Why would masses of disgruntled idiots consistently vote for 1%ers and then find it rational to complain about the rich caulk soakers not representing them?
how the f(*& do you know? Your a biblical scholar? You assholes make false claims abouit Jesus and Christians all the time-I heard that mohamed was a child sex addict and also had sex with animals. Ya think that's true?
Mohamed married a 9 year old - one of 12 wives
[Removed]
[Removed]
I can't tell you how I KNOW unless you are a democrat. I think you may be, but, I'm not sure.
[Removed]
[Removed]
Historically or factually, there was no jesus. It is part of the Roman media machine lead by Constantine. The new books in the bible are from people that had never met jesus hundreds of years later after his so call existence. In fact there are known counterfeits of people trying to make a historical paper trail for jesus. Why would they do this unless jesus never existed. Religion is man made, something that came before TV.
[Removed]
Jesus never married.
There seems to be evidence to indicate otherwise.
who did he marry? dan brown books don't count as research.
I have all the scrolls and will not tell you unless you are a democrat.
you're a phoney.
Are you one of them evil "R's"?
Lol!
[Removed]
[Removed]
Assuming that there was an historical Jesus, which is an extremely problematic assumption, he is assumed to have been a carpenter, a working man, certainly not among the elite of either the Jewish state or the Roman empire. According to the book of Acts early Christianity was essentially a communist-Jewish sect made up largely of poor Jews, peasants and craftsmen. It is precisely because of this that literal Christian communism broke down very early on. Short of expropriating the very wealthy there simply was not enough to go around.
Strangely enough, it appears there were hundred, perhaps thousands of infant males named Jesus in that time period. It was a popular name, the political and racial tensions fed the 'prophecy' which lead many young mothers to name their child in hopes of fulfilling that prophecy.
Is it too large a leap to enter into conjecture that the 'historical Jesus' was actually several 'Jesus' ', engaged in politcal activism?
That said, while this may be an interesting sidebar, please let's get on with the business of OWS.
Jesus is only a corruption of the name Joshua. Historically we are talking about Joshua Ben Joseph.
Yeah, but we must remember our readership...
"Hey, I resemble that remark!" (Jerome "Curly" Howard R.I.P.)
Here's a like for ya!
[Removed]
Well paupers were not laid to rest in private tombs. Is it problematic to assume Lazarus existed and had great wealth?
The historical Christ was not a person of wealth, but neither was he a pauper. He was a craftsman with a rather large following. I'm not up on my biblical history, but the last seder took place in a house owned by Joseph of Aramathia (sp?) who was a person of wealth and I believe the tomb also was supposed to be his.
[Removed]
He was a democrat, through and through, even though it didn't work out well for him
[Removed]
I'm still waiting for someone to come back from the dead who's been there long term to give us a report on what they have seen.