Forum Post: Is this website run by the NYPD?
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 7, 2011, 10:38 a.m. EST by nomdeguerre
(1775)
from Brooklyn, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
A whole group of nested comments (including my own) disappeared from a discussion of possible NYPD perfidy. The post: http://occupywallst.org/forum/nypd-incites-violence-by-assualting-undercover-cop/.
Look at Sudoname's comment near the bottom. There are no subcomments.
From Google's cache (my nested comment is at the bottom):
sudoname (Berkeley, CA) 1 points 3 hours ago
Very interesting. I agree that is nonsensical behavior from the cop and the "assaulted". Why does the cop target that one guy? The guy even looks like a plant.
Fortunately for us, we just have to prove ONE of these incidents was foul play and it all falls apart for them. reply permalink
happy 1 points 3 hours ago
"looks like a plant" Now you have the ability to tell who someone is by the way the look? reply permalink
TH3W01F (Ottawa, ON) 1 points 3 hours ago
As much as I am a support of OWS, let's stick to the facts. Unless there is evidence of a "plant", then we should just chalk it up as a "troublemaker". reply permalink
happy 1 points 2 hours ago
Agreed. While I am sure there are undercover police among the OWS protesters, after all there are a lot of reason for them to be there (anarchists, communists, drugs, etc) But to say things such as this without proof is just another way to gin things up. reply permalink
TH3W01F (Ottawa, ON) 1 points 2 hours ago
I concur. reply permalink
nomdeguerre (Brooklyn, NY) 1 points 2 hours ago
If we wait for what you call "proof" we will all be raped and pregnant. We absolutely need to be ahead of the badged criminals. We're free to draw reasonable conclusions from reasonable evidence, our knowledge of human behavior and patterns of behavior.
False flag crimes (where either both the perp and victim are in on it, or where the perp is an undercover lawman seeking to discredit OWS) are an extreme danger to OWS, as I see it. reply permalink
[END CACHE]
Or is there a technical reason? A glitch?
I didn't notice this part was deleted. very bizarre. I don't know enough about the moderation of this forum to know why this happened. Any one else know?