Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Is OWS yet another tool of the "NWO" ?

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 30, 2011, 1:24 a.m. EST by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

If so, they, or someone else have planted a conspiracy theory: http://pastebin.com/PK3bhKbU (pastebin'd so you just see the text)

If I know anything about conspiracy theory writings, it's that they present a block of information with "watermarks" and holes, so that the "conspiracy theorist" is easy to debase. I'm wondering about your input.

This said, I think the 1% robinhood transaction tax is way too high and would effectively shut down the markets. When initially proposed, it was around .05%. Anyhow, I think we should NOT unite behind a radical idea like this without knowing every detail.

Gandhi Mindset.

13 Comments

13 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by Forrest (17) from Dubai, Dubai 13 years ago

YUP, OWS organizers shot Kennedy!

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

I see it's morning in Dubai - hello!

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

Gives a whole new meaning to 'grassy knoll" doesn't it? LOL

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

No I think it's just a way for scammers to get money from gullible but well meaning people.

Once you've watched things on this site for a while you'll probably notice it shows every sign of being nothing more than fraud

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

I did hear of foul play within this particular forum (though unproven), but I think the money does end up in the hands of the nyc general assembly. Personally, I don't feel that donating money helps - it's better to spread the word and discuss on other forums on the internet.

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

I've seen all the proof I need to. Too many examples to count.

What's up with the Ron Lawl name censorship?

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

Damn, they deleted this thread. They don't actually delete it, they just un-list it.

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

It's kindof a joke I guess (I talked with the admin). At one point there were a ton of Ron Lawl posts on here and I think they just wanted to stop it. Hopefully they'll change it back or do the same honor to the other candidates.

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

I'm not laughing. It's complete hypocrisy. If it comes to pass that President Obama's camp or any other political entity is in any way behind that crap they are going to lose out on supporters BTW.

Whoever made this site isn't too skilled or has made this forum pretty much worthless the way it's design to begin with. Looks like it's made on purpose to be impossible to use to begin with. 25 tpocis which fall off the front page within seconds? Get real.

Unwanted people can be banned in all kinds of ways other that to more-less slander a public figure's name besides

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

The forum grew way too fast.. by the way, this domain was registered 1 day after adbusters' announcement of OWS.

Also by the way, the source code is available and another site has based itself on it: http://www.occupyr.com/ At the very least, it has categories.. but a lot less users.

I think a central site like occupywallst.org is a recipe for disaster/oxymoron in a decentralized movement.

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

I've never seen another forum anywhere that only had one page for topics, let alone one which didn't have subforums.

Does it seem like it most likely was made this way on purpose, or is anyone really that naïve?

[-] 1 points by david157ts (54) 13 years ago

Maybe some seo black hatters can knock this piece of crap site off the first page of google?

[-] 1 points by sudoname (1001) from Berkeley, CA 13 years ago

I just think we have to move to other sites or make our own. I agree it is mostly unusable, unless you're having a conversation with one person.

The calls for some organization have come again and again. jart (the admin) says she doesn't have enough time for big changes. Someone will have to step up and make a better site (for instance occupyr).