Forum Post: Iran - Waiting for the big event.
Posted 12 years ago on Jan. 15, 2012, 9:43 a.m. EST by nickhowdy
(1104)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
From Activist Post:
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/us-constantly-violates-war-law-arrest.html
"US “leadership” lies to create a new war target: Iran. Just as we know all “reasons” to attack Iraq were known lies as they were told, anyone can verify that “reasons” to attack Iran are obvious lies: Iran’s president only asks for lawful acts with Palestinians from Israel (not “wiping Israel off the map”), and all Iran’s nuclear energy and medical isotopes are verified as only and always used for their legal purposes (not a “nuclear program” that might have “secret” planning for weapons). Moreover, it’s conservative uncontested history that the US overthrew Iran’s democracy from 1953-1979, and assisted criminal war on Iran from 1980-1988.
The predictable US “leadership” move is a false flag attack by them upon Americans that is then blamed on Iran. That is, US “leadership” will attack and kill Americans, use their own media to lie and blame Iran, and then continue the lies in a “defensive” war.
US military, law enforcement, all Americans, and all global citizens have opportunity to stand, speak, and act for truth, justice and peace before Obama and “leadership” mass-murder Iranians."
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/us-constantly-violates-war-law-arrest.html
Yes,
Isn't it convenient that this all started the day after the troops started coming home from Iraq.
Coincidence? I think not.
Gotta keep the wars going..
Joe,
Here's you a new topic for a post. I enjoy reading your comments and replies. Thanks for taking your time to spend it with us.
Question: Are you for the voting system that elects just one leader that can push the nuclear bomb switches and blow up our brothers and sisters on the planet? looking for a your vote YES or NO
No I am not for that and am glad we don't have that.
Who decides in America when to flip the switch?
The US President can launch a nuclear first strike but not without the cooperation of the Secretary of Defense or another administrative official that's been appointed/approved by Congress.
Sure it is in the hands of a small number of people but I do not believe they would act. I could be wrong. If it does happen I will not be around to argue about it so I am not going to worry about it.
I am more worried about our foreign policies of military intervention overseas and the enemies we create by our actions.
the US has not used nuclear weapons since 1945
Here is one for you.
The US is the only country that has used nuclear weapons AND they were used on civilian targets.
Every country on the planet that has a military force that wants to play the game Who's King of the Hill.
History repeats and Nature culls out the weak.
[Removed]