Forum Post: Iran is supplying Syrian regime?
Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 1, 2012, 8:54 p.m. EST by CitizenofAmerika
(-71)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Saw a report on NBC news that some of the so called "freedom fighters" in Syria are claiming that Iran is supplying the Assad regime. Could this be yet another plan by the U.S./Israeli warmongers?
NO! it is a plan for Iran to support it's fellow dictator
[Removed]
It is true for a change (NBC is not known for truthful news though). Iran is helping the dictator in Syria kill the majority Sunna population by directly bombing civilian areas and towns with Russian bombers and ammunition.
Tens of thousands have perished by the government even before the population started to fight back. The revolution was peaceful for over a year while the dictator was killing their children from day one.
But it is interesting that you @CitizenofIsrael would post such an entry. There must be something for Israel in this. You associate the US with Israel when they have parted on Israel's appetite for wars sometime ago.
They have parted nothing. Amerika is every bit as mixed in this shit as Israel is. If you think this country won't back Israel's play then your head is up your ass. And are you accusing me of being a Zionist? I'm about as far from that as you can get.
The Islamic Genocide Records of
ARAB/MUSLIM on ARAB/MUSLIM killings 1948- today:
-100,000 North Yemen, 1962-70
-140,000 Kuwait War, 1990-91
-150,000 Lebanon civil war, 1975-90
-150,000 Liberia, 1989-97
-300,000 Iraq, 1970-2003 (Saddam against minorities)
-300,000 Kurds in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, 1980s-1990s
-400,000 Somalia, 1991-present
-200,000 Algeria, 1991-2006 (between Islamists and the government)
-1,000,000 Iran-Iraq-War, 1980-88
-1,100,000 Nigeria, 1966-79 (Biafra); 1993-present
-1,900,000 Sudan, 1955-72; 1983-2006 (civil wars, genocides)
Nor is Iraq (Sunni versus Shiite) the only place where Muslim violence against Muslims rages unabated.
There is Darfur in Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Algeria until recently, and hotspots in Iran, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, Uzbekistan, Palestine, Morocco, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon.
Muslims killed 80,000,000 Hindus to conquer India Will Durant, the famous historian summed it up like this: "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."
Koenraad Elst , the german historian writes in "Negation in India" The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new Muslim invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter. The Muslim Bahmani sultans (1347-1480) in central India made it a rule to kill 100,000 captives in a single day, and many more on other occasions. The conquest of the Vijayanagar empire in 1564 left the capital plus large areas of Karnataka depopulated. And so on. As a contribution to research on the quantity of the Islamic crimes against humanity, we may mention that the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate)..
But the "Indian Pagans" were far too numerous and never fully surrendered. What some call the Muslim period in Indian history, was in reality a continuous war of occupiers against resisters, in which the Muslim rulers were finally defeated in the 18th century. Against these rebellious Pagans the Muslim rulers preferred to avoid total confrontation, and to accept the compromise which the (in India dominant) Hanifite school of Islamic law made possible. Alone among the four Islamic law schools, the school of Hanifa gave Muslim rulers the right not to offer the Pagans the sole choice between death and conversion, but to allow them toleration as zimmis (protected ones) living under 20 humiliating conditions, and to collect the jizya (toleration tax) from them. Normally the zimmi status was only open to Jews and Christians (and even that concession was condemned by jurists of the Hanbalite school like lbn Taymiya), which explains why these communities have survived in Muslim countries while most other religions have not. On these conditions some of the higher Hindu castes could be found willing to collaborate, so that a more or less stable polity could be set up. Even then, the collaboration of the Rajputs with the Moghul rulers, or of the Kayasthas with the Nawab dynasty, one became a smooth arrangement when enlightened rulers like Akbar (whom orthodox Muslims consider an apostate) cancelled these humiliating conditions and the jizya tax.
[Removed]
Lets see- who blames WW2 on Jews? nazis & you
[Removed]