Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: I used to be the 99%, then I stopped complaining

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 18, 2011, 5:19 a.m. EST by mccain2012 (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I am amazed that the "99%" has no problem holding a sign in protest, but is "above" holding a sign for the local pizza parlor for minimum wage.

Cheers

6 Comments

6 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by vettezeppelin (163) 13 years ago

You used to be the 99% but you stopped complaining and now you are the 1% !?! Wow thats all we gotta do is stop complaining and pick up a sign that says GodFathers Pizza 9.9.9 and we all be rich like YOU !?! oh my gosh what were we all thinking!?! Hmmm I bet you arent the top 1% but you believe in the lie that they have told us for generations now..,shut up, be happy you got a job and don't complain that there's a wage freeze again this year because if we gotta pay you more we will just outsource your job to China oh and by the way, can you be sure my jet is ready at 2..oh and you will be rich someday oh yeah someday.....

[-] 1 points by briceryant (47) 13 years ago

"I am amazed that these Colonials have no problem picking up a rifle, but are 'above' picking up a hoe to grow England her tobacco." -King George III, 1775

[-] 1 points by Hellomynameis (243) from Aptos, CA 13 years ago

Or maybe you shouldn't generalize an entire movement.

[-] 1 points by peacescientist (169) 13 years ago

Ive done both.....

[-] 0 points by Mcc (542) 13 years ago

Umm. I'm no expert but I don't believe that there are quite enough pizza jobs out there to employ the lower 99 percent. You might want to check your math or just start over. Do you know of an individual who turned down such an offer? In the meantime, let's get back on track:

We have been mislead by Reagan, Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama, and nearly every other public figure. Economic growth, job creation, and actual prosperity are not necessarily a package deal. In fact, the first two are horribly misunderstood. Economic growth/loss (GDP) is little more than a measure of wealth changing hands. A transfer of currency from one party to another. The rate at which it is traded. This was up until mid ’07′ however, has never been a measure of actual prosperity. Neither has job creation. The phrase itself has been thrown around so often, and in such a generic political manner, that it has come to mean nothing. Of course, we need to have certain things done for the benefit of society as a whole. We need farmers, builders, manufacturers, transporters, teachers, cops, firefighters, soldiers, mechanics, sanitation workers, doctors, managers, and visionaries. Their work is vital. I’ll even go out on a limb and say that we need politicians, attorneys, bankers, investors, and entertainers. In order to keep them productive, we must provide reasonable incentives. We need to compensate each by a fair measure for their actual contributions to society. We need to provide a reasonable scale of income opportunity for every independent adult, every provider, and share responsibility for those who have a legitimate need for aid. In order to achieve and sustain this, we must also address the cost of living and the distribution of wealth. Here, we have failed miserably. The majority have already lost their home equity, their financial security, and their relative buying power. The middle class have actually lost much of their ability to make ends meet, re-pay loans, pay taxes, and support their own economy. The lower class have gone nearly bankrupt. In all, its a multi-trillion dollar loss taken over about 30 years. Millions are under the impression that we need to create more jobs simply to provide more opportunity. as if that would solve the problem. It won’t. Not by a longshot. Jobs don’t necessarily create wealth. In fact, they almost never do. For the mostpart, they only transfer wealth from one party to another. A gain here. A loss there. Appreciation in one community. Depreciation in another. In order to create net wealth, you must harvest a new resource or make more efficient use of one. Either way you must have a reliable and ethical system in place to distribute that newly created wealth in order to benefit society as a whole and prevent a lagging downside. The ‘free market’ just doesn’t cut it. Its a farce. Many of the jobs created are nothing but filler. The promises empty. Sure, unemployment reached an all-time low under Bush. GDP reached an all-time high. But those are both shallow and misleading indicators. In order to gauge actual prosperity, you must consider the economy in human terms. As of ’08′ the average American was working more hours than the previous generation with far less equity to show for it. Consumer debt, forclosure, and bankruptcy were also at all-time highs. As of ’08′, every major American city was riddled with depressed communities, neglected neighborhoods, failing infrastructures, lost revenue, and gang activity. All of this has coincided with massive economic growth and job creation. Meanwhile, the rich have been getting richer and richer and richer even after taxes. Our nation’s wealth has been concentrated. Again, this represents a multi-trillion dollar loss taken by the majority. Its an absolute deal breaker. Bottom line: With or without economic growth or job creation, you must have a system in place to prevent too much wealth from being concentrated at the top. Unfortunately, we don’t. Our economy has become nothing but a giant game of Monopoly. The richest one percent already own nearly 1/2 of all United States wealth. More than double their share before Reagan took office. Still, they want more. They absolutely will not stop. Now, our society as a whole is in serious jeapordy. Greed kills.

[-] 1 points by Fedup10 (228) 13 years ago

Success breeds success while entitlements breed lethargy.