Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: H.R. 347: Get the Truth on the New 'Protest Law' ... But NOT from fundraising groups like the ACLU or unknowns like the PCJF

Posted 12 years ago on March 8, 2012, 8:12 p.m. EST by ironboltbruce (371) from Miami, FL
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

H.R. 347: Get the Truth on the New 'Protest Law'...

But NOT from fundraising groups like the ACLU or PCJF - and that's what they really are - who got caught with their pants down on HR347 and are trying to downplay the significance of the changes:

http://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill

http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/hr-347-get-the-truth.html

NDAA 2012 is being sold, after all, as a subtle change to AUMF 2001. HR 347 is no different. This is how they "boil the frogs". We released the Truth, and we stand behind it:

http://corporategreedchronicles.com/2012/03/01/outlawing-the-occupy-movement-h-r-347-makes-free-speech-a-felony/

IronBoltBruce

P.S. Who in Hell is the PCJF anyway? Their website, Facebook and Twitter account look like they were thrown together in a hurry:

http://www.justiceonline.org

http://www.facebook.com/PCJFund

https://twitter.com/#!/ThePCJF

2 Comments

2 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 0 points by ironboltbruce (371) from Miami, FL 12 years ago

Original Message From: VVV PR [mailto:vvvpr@vvvpr.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:56 AM To: 'mvh@JusticeOnline.org' Cc: 'newsroom@salem-news.com'

Subject: Implying HR 347 is no big deal because much of it was already law is like saying NDAA 2012 is OK because we already had AUMF 2001.

Re: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/march082012/hr347-clarity-mvh.php

Mara,

Implying HR 347 is no big deal because much of it was already law is like saying NDAA 2012 is OK because we already had AUMF 2001.

IronBoltBruce

http://salem-news.com/articles/february292012/hr-347-ibb.php

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply
[-] 0 points by ironboltbruce (371) from Miami, FL 12 years ago

Original Message From: VVV PR [mailto:vvvpr@vvvpr.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:22 AM To: 'natasha.lennard@gmail.com'

Subject: Implying HR 347 is no big deal because much of it was already law is like saying NDAA 2012 is OK because we already had AUMF 2001.

Re: http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/the_inside_scoop_on_hr_347/singleton/

Natasha,

Implying HR 347 is no big deal because much of it was already law is like saying NDAA 2012 is OK because we already had AUMF 2001.

IronBoltBruce

http://open.salon.com/blog/watchingfrogsboil/2012/03/01/outlawing_occupy_hr_347_makes_free_speech_a_felony

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply