Forum Post: GM temporarily halts production of Volt
Posted 12 years ago on March 2, 2012, 7:30 p.m. EST by Jflynn1964
(-206)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
By Keith Laing - 03/02/12 03:39 PM ET
General Motors has temporarily suspended production of its Volt electric car, the company announced Friday.
GM, which is based in Detroit, announced to employees at one of its facilities that it was halting production of the beleaguered electric car for five weeks and temporarily laying off 1,300 employees.
"We needed to maintain proper inventory and make sure that we continued to meet market demand," GM spokesman Chris Lee said in a telephone interview.
Lee noted that sales of the Volt were higher in February than they were in January, and added that California recently decided to allow the electric car to qualify for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the state.
"We see positive trends, but we needed to make this market adjustment," he said.
The Chevy Volt has come under criticism from Republicans in Congress because of reports of its batteries catching on fire during testing. President Obama gave the electric vehicle a vote of confidence in a speech to the United Auto Workers union this week, promising he would buy a Volt "five years from now, when I'm not president anymore."
But Republicans have argued that the Volt was being pushed by the Obama administration for political reasons instead of consumer demand.
“Is the commitment to the American public or is the commitment to clean energy, that we are going to get there any way we can?” Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) asked in a hearing in the House in January about the Volt's reported battery fires.
“When the market is ready … it won’t have to be subsidized,” Kelly said.
Chevy has argued the debate about the Volt has become too political.
"We did not develop the Chevy Volt to be a political punching bag," General Motors CEO Daniel Akerson testified before Congress in the same January hearing. "We engineered the Volt to be a technological wonder."
Chevy has sought to give a boost to the public image of the Volt, releasing a commercial in January tying the Volt to the effort to reduce dependence on foreign oil.
"This isn’t just the car we wanted to build,” a narrator says in the commercial over footage of Volts being manufactured in Hamtramck, Mich. “This is the car America had to build.”
Nissan: "Comparing miles per gallon is suddenly irrelevant," look at miles per dollar instead
http://green.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/nissan-comparing-miles-per-gallon-is-suddenly-irrelevant-loo/
These two cars are completely identical, in engine size, battery size, etc so if there is a discrepancy in MPG it means one is less efficient for all drivers no matter what their distances and habits are.
miles per dollar MPD
that would be dependent on electricity cost
But but but, we have the supply, thats all we need. Isn't that what supply side economics says?
If there was no other competition. They could lower the price and yes they would move cars.
would public electrical plants help?
The Volt is an interesting auto, but honestly it does not have much of a use in over 3/4 of the country. I say this by using the size of the nation in miles, versus the population density. In cities it is a small practical car, but outside of the cities it is completely a useless machine, especially in rural America. On top of it all, the batteries need replacement (under normal circumstances) every 10 years. The old batteries are then shipped over seas to be "recycled" by dumping the chemicals into a river and recycling the metals within the batteries. Honestly, the car is a good concept, but it is not what America really needs.
I want a car with a thorium reactor as it's sole energy supply.
One more time: so called green tech is not viable on a mass scale.