Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Free Ted Nugent Concert!!

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 31, 2011, 9:39 p.m. EST by unitedwe (78)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

That's what I heard. Javits Center, Wednesday evening.

18 Comments

18 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

...get in the first 10 rows using your American Express membership points.

[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

Free blanket with purchase of any t-shirt.

[-] 1 points by Bambi (359) 13 years ago

I think I'd double check that rumor if I were you. He is richer than most that work on Wall Street

[-] 1 points by ModestCapitalist (2342) 13 years ago

The rich and famous do not want to be seen as 'pigs' or go down in history as 'villains'. They want to be seen as 'heros' and go down in history as 'humanitarians'. The market for their product has become global. The fan base has become global. Therefore, the 'humanitarian' effort and 'good will' PR machine has gone global.  These 'humanitarian' efforts and 'good deeds' are not chosen to address the greatest need or injustice. They are chosen almost exclusively to appeal to the largest demographic for their respective commercial products. The largest fan base.  Efficiency or effect is of little or no concern. Its all about PR, marketing, image, and fame.

This is why so many of the rich and famous have taken up 'philanthropy' or 'good will' around the world. This is why so many have 'schools' or 'foundations' in their name. This is why so many play golf or appear on a TV game show for 'charity'. This is why so many sign motorcycles, other merchandise, or auction off their own 'personal effects' for 'charity'. This is why so many have TV shows with a 'charitable' gimmick. This is why so many arrange photo ops with wounded veterans, firefighters, or sick children. This is why so many have adopted children from around the world (Which they always pay others to care for full time. The hired professionals are sworn by legal contract to confidentiality. Not allowed to discuss or appear in public with the children they care for. Those 'photo' and 'interview' opportunities are reserved exclusively for the rich and famous 'adoptive' parents. Often sold for millions.). This is why every 'humanitarian' effort and 'good deed' is plastered all over the media worldwide. Its not about 'humanity' or 'good will'. Its all about marketing, image, fame, and PROFIT. This is why we are so often reminded of their respective 'good deeds' or 'humanitarian' efforts shortly before or after the release of their latest commercial product. IT IS A SHAM. 

Charitywatch.org and Charitynavigator.org are both non-profit charity watchdogs. Of all the well rated charities (about 1500) only three are closely affiliated with celebrities. Michael J Fox (he is not the primary donor), Tiger Woods (he is not the primary donor), and Bill Clinton (he is not the primary donor). That's three well rated celebrity foundations out of 1500. THREE OUT OF 1500. In general, celebrity foundations run like crap because they blow half the money flying around in private jets, securing five star accommodations, and hiring PR crews.

The fans have been terribly misled. For example:

Virtually every penny 'donated' by Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt to date has come from the repeated sales of baby photos. With each sale, the baby money goes to the 'Jolie-Pitt' 'foundation '. A foundation which has never done anything but shelter funds.     

When Jolie or Pitt have a new movie to promote, a portion is then donated from their own 'foundation' to a legitimate charity. This leaves their ignorant fans under the impression that 'another' donation has been made. When in fact, its the same baby money being transferred again and again. Another portion is blown on private jet rides, super-exclusive high-end accommodations, photo ops, and PR crap. This saves Jolie and Pitt millions on travel/stay expenses and their respective studios tens of millions in advertising. It's all very calculated. 

Of course, Jolie and Pitt could simply endorse any of the 1500 most efficient and effective charities. Of course, the baby money would go much further and do far more good it were donated to such charities to begin with. 

But that would be too boring. 

The 'Make it Right' Foundation took in over $12,000,000 the first year alone. Tens of millions overall. Brad Pitt has never been the primary donor, planner, or designer. Not even close. He is a figurehead and salesman with a position on the board of advisors. Nothing more. Still, he has been showered with glorious praise by fellow celebrities and media outlets around the world. Again, the fans have been terribly misled. 

In order to move into a 'green' home, the innocent victims of Katrina are required to provide a property deed, meet a number of financial requirements, and pay an average of $150,000 UP FRONT. That's tougher financing than any bank. The difference is offered in cheap loans or on rare occasion forgiven. To date, only a few dozen former residents have qualified. 

The 'Make it Right' foundation was never intended to help the lower income residents of New Orleans. In fact, 'Make it Right' is part of a calculated effort to rebuild the Lower Ninth Ward without them. Part of a calculated effort to raise property values in the area by displacing the poor. They are by design, excluded.  Of course, Brad Pitt could have simply endorsed 'Habitat For Humanity'. A well known, proven, and efficient home building operation. Of course, the tens of millions in funding would have gone MUCH further.

But that would be too boring.   Big name celebrities have no desire to make the world a better place.

Their primary goal is to appear as if they do.

[-] 1 points by Bambi (359) 13 years ago

BRILLIANT!!! Thank you for sharing all of that.. I have always said no celeb is legit in their "giving"..including Michael SSCHMOORE. That idiot pisses me off with his big nose in the air thinking he is just "one of us". He's a liar. They all are. I fortunately don't believe in "celebrity" but many do and many cater to their........"charities". They go to the toilet like the rest of us. They are no big deal and nothing to be admired. Damn this message you wrote has made my day.

THANK YOU!

[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

Alrighty, then. Thanks!

[-] 1 points by PartyX (202) 13 years ago

wang bang sweet poon tang... is it a free for all?

[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

Intensity in Tent Cities.

[-] 1 points by pissedoffconstructionworker (602) 13 years ago

+1.....

[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

what does +1 mean?

[-] 1 points by paulg5 (673) 13 years ago

Valuable insight.....but i'm not shocked!

[-] 1 points by unitedwe (78) 13 years ago

still not following...