Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: FDR's Economic Bill of Rights- From OCCUPYSATX

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 9, 2011, 3:18 p.m. EST by Angelicatron (13) from San Antonio, TX
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

In my opinion this is what we should be striving for:

http://www.fdrheritage.org/bill_of_rights.htm

“The Economic Bill of Rights”

Excerpt from President Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union

It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens.

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by Angelicatron (13) from San Antonio, TX 13 years ago

I think it's sad that everyone just tries to cut down anyone that posts anything on here, it's all i ever read. Never any positive messages or support for new ideas. Nothing will get accomplished like this. We're on the same side. We all want to see some changes.

[-] 1 points by Angelicatron (13) from San Antonio, TX 13 years ago

this isn't about FDR, its about the concept.

[-] 1 points by EndTheFedNow (692) 13 years ago

FDR dragged America into WWII Europe. He also confiscated gold, from Americans, forcing them to take paper in return. He then allowed his European elite cronies to cash in paper US dollars for that same gold he stole from Americans. He was a terrible president who looted America.

[-] 1 points by HankRearden (476) 13 years ago

And seize the gold, making it a felony to get caught with gold coins, replacing the people's wealth with paper.

You forgot one. Fixed it for ya. You almost forgot the 5th plank of the communist manifesto there.

[-] 1 points by vegaseller (25) 13 years ago

FDR was also against the concept of public sector unions. Or are you going to only pick the parts you like.

[-] 1 points by Angelicatron (13) from San Antonio, TX 13 years ago

we have to reinterpret this into a 21st century concept.

[-] 1 points by vegaseller (25) 13 years ago

In the sense that there 6 trillion in unfunded public pension liabilities that will come due in the next couple of years, so lets become lackeys for the public employee unions who are fighting ferociously to defend their benefits.