Forum Post: Donkey Market
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 5, 2011, 2:25 a.m. EST by benjamin
(3)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
A well-dressed stranger arrived one day to a peaceful, quiet and content village. Standing in the middle of the village, he announced that he was buying donkeys, $100 a head. Of course, the villagers needed their donkeys. They helped them cultivate the soil, produce food and live a modest, yet decent life. Nonetheless, to some, the price seemed attractive. The amount of $100 was a lot for them. And so, they sold their donkeys.
The next day the stranger came back. This time, he was offering $150 per donkey. Once again, some villages were tempted and sold their animals.
The good stranger returned to the village for the third day and offered $200. The story repeated even the next day when the very last villagers sold their donkeys for $250 each.
A few days later, the good man showed up again -- this time offering $500 per donkey! You can imagine the people's disappointment when nobody had any donkeys left to sell.
But the story is not over yet! A new stranger arrived the very next day, selling donkeys for $400 a piece! The villagers saw an opportunity for great profit. They thought they would buy his donkeys at a cost of $400 each and then sell each one for $500, making a profit of $100 every time. But nobody had this kind of money. They rushed to the bank and asked for loans. Now, everybody had their own donkey again, except that this time a donkey was worth five times more!
But sadly, there were no buyers who would buy these expensive donkeys. The villagers could not repay their loans and the banker was on the brink of bankruptcy. In order to avoid it, he seized all the donkeys from the villagers. Still, by doing so, he got back only part of the loans and his collapse was imminent. He turned for help to the village mayor. After all, his bank managed important business for the township and the banker was also the town councilor.
The mayor lent the banker the money from the town's treasury. But the debt kept growing. The mayor then raised the taxes which the villagers could not pay.
When the budget ran out, the mayor turned to friends in other townships. To his surprise, all of them were in the same situation! The exact same story took place everywhere!
So all the mayors agreed to make some radical reforms. They began to save in all areas, cutting budgets for schools, kindergartens, pensions, healthcare... When even this was not enough, it was necessary to raise the taxes.
Through public media, the mayors quickly started to condemn this immoral story and the fraudsters who were already peacefully enjoying their hard-earned holidays. But the fraudsters showed a great deal of understanding for the crisis. From their luxurious villas on the Bahamas, they informed the mayors that they will support their election campaigns!
The lesson of this story? There is none, because in the donkey market, there will always be plenty of fools, well-dressed gentlemen and greed for everybody.
Wait where'd that guy get the money to buy all those donkeys in the first place?
moral of the story: don't enter something until you have an exit strategy.
Sounds familiar
Painfully so.
Freedom is buying elections from your villa in the Bahamas!
Reminds me of all the Donkeys that bought fancy homes in 2006.
Ehh... I don't know if most were speculating in the housing market. I think many were intent on long term investment. And I don't know if the failure to make payments is responsible for the municipalities failure to meet its obligations. Because the bank that repossesses assumes the tax liability. I think this a clear case of government mismanagement.
Explain how government mismanagement caused the housing bubble please?
The deficits at all levels of government are not the result of the the market crash or the burst of the housing bubble but entirely as the result of mismanagement.
I wasn't disagreeing, I just wanted someone to say it. I think the key fault happened when the Capital Gains tax was lowered in 2006. Had that not happened, this movement probably would not exist today. The second fault that has left this so called recovery stagnant happened when Obama extended the Cap Tax cuts into 2012. The housing bubble was going to pop. Housing prices were consistently rising faster than the rate of inflation, which means eventually they would have to level off and wait for inflation or the entire market would deflate, which is what happened. That deflation led to bank bailouts and the market crash, which cause rapid deflation across the board (except for oil, ironically, and precious metals). There are many things that can be blamed for the bubble. Cutting the Cap Tax in no way helped slow the housing market inflation nor does it provide the much needed revenue we so desperately need now. I used to be completely antitaxation, but I am 100% for a capital gains tax increase now.
Well, sure, in terms of an increasing disparity that was certainly a contributing factor. But there's a whole host of factors, some of which are interrelated, and some that are not.
I'm not big on paying taxes because I don't believe that government should be a burden on society or own a significant portion of our labor, especially in light of the way that money is frivolously spent.