Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Endangered Lawmakers Move To Back Bill Banning Congressional Insider Trading

Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 14, 2011, 6:59 a.m. EST by MonetizingDiscontent (1257)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement


And now, with NADEX ‘Prediction Market’ trading – hedge-funds can return the favor by giving politicians inside NADEX tips

http://maxkeiser.com/2011/12/23/and-now-with-nadex-prediction-market-trading-hedge-funds-can-now-return-the-favor-by-giving-politicians-inside-nadex-tips/

-December 23, 2011-

Hedge-Fund Titans Got Inside Political Tips

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/hedge-fund-titans-got-inside-political-tips.html

The ability to trade on inside Wall St. and Washington information will increase exponentially when NADEX starts trading ‘Prediction Market’ political contracts in January. The entire political process will enter a new era of farce as vote-rigging gets ‘securitized’ and ‘financialized.’ Of course this will be seen as a triumph for ‘free markets’ and not for what it really is: hyper-kleptocracy.


Hedge-Fund Titans Got Inside Political Tips

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/hedge-fund-titans-got-inside-political-tips.html

-12/20/11-

I’m surprised this Wall Street Journal story... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204844504577100260349084878.html ...detailing how hedge funds manage to obtain profitable inside information, hasn’t gotten more attention. The whole story seems pretty explosive. I’d like to pull out a bit at the end, about how some hedge-fund players learned that key Democratic moderates in the Senate would jettison the public option in the health care bill in 2009:

The weekend before the Dec. 8, 2009 session, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) held Senate sessions on Saturday and Sunday, seeking a deal. Another senator, Tom Carper (D., Del.), also was trying to help. The central issue: Would the bill call for the government to create a public health insurance plan, the position supported by President Barack Obama?

To counter Republican opposition, Democrats needed votes from Messrs. Lieberman and Nelson, who said they had major concerns with a robust government-insurance plan. As negotiations neared a resolution, JNK Securities and its hedge-fund clients met a half-dozen lawmakers in the U.S. Capitol. Among those who spoke to the hedge funds were Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Carper on Dec. 8, according to their offices. The roster included Viking Global's Scott Zinober and Karsch Capital's Eric Potoker.

The broad outlines of an agreement had been circulating for days, but the lawmakers confirmed they were close to a deal that discarded the public insurance plan, a boost to private insurers. Viking, a hedge fund that manages $13.8 billion, bought six million shares of Aetna in that fourth quarter of 2009, according to regulatory filings. Karsch, which manages $2.4 billion, bought half a million Aetna shares during the same period, according to regulatory records. Shares of Aetna rose 14% in the fourth quarter.

There was always a slightly puzzling dynamic at work in the fight over the public option. It polled extremely well, but key Democrats in the Senate opposed it. Now, you could envision a justification for Democrats from red states opposing the measure on political grounds – even if the measure itself was popular, perhaps they saw more value in breaking from the liberal wing and demonstrating “moderation,” regardless of the specifics of the issue. But then you had, among the public option skeptics, blue state Democrats like Lieberman and Carper. It’s … interesting to learn that they were meeting with hedge-fund executives and telling them about their efforts to subvert the public option.

There’s a broader problem here for the liberal economic agenda. Democrats live in a milieu that is far richer, and more attuned to the needs of business, than their broader constituencies. Republicans in Congress basically never need to pay attention to labor unions or poverty advocates. But Democrats in Congress are surrounded by rich people, and are usually rich themselves. Even putting aside their need for campaign donations, Democrats have a social support network that strongly incentivizes them to adopt “moderate” pro-business stances. Even if absolutely nothing untoward occurred between the hedge funds and the senators, the corruption inherent in the relationship is profound.


-Insider Trading and Congress-

Live Hearing On Whether Insider Trading By Congress Should Be Illegal

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/live-hearing-whether-insider-trading-congress-should-be-illegal

-12/06/2011-
Only in a banana republic would Congress be "forced" to hold hearings on whether to ban itself from illegal (for everyone else) insider trading.

Which explains why below readers can watch precisely that, live from the house Committee on Financial Services.The legislation in question relates to bill H.R. 1148... http://financialservices.house.gov/UploadedFiles/hr1148ai.pdf ...the "Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act." We wonder how long until Congress manages to scuttle this latest effort to keep the playing field between the muppets and everyone else. After all, someone has to leak critical rating agency information (such as the FT's break of a key S&P leak yesterday, or Nancy Pelosi knowing weeks in advance that Moody's... http://www.zerohedge.com/article/moodys-leaked-again-told-nancy-pelosi-will-probably-not-downgrade-us-weeks-ago-did-her-multi ...would not downgrade the US) to the media and/or trading entities.

(((Continue Reading this article Here))) http://www.zerohedge.com/news/live-hearing-whether-insider-trading-congress-should-be-illegal


Endangered Lawmakers Move To Back Bill Banning Congressional Insider Trading

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/195429-lawmakers-facing-tough-reelection-fights-back-bill-banning-congressional-insider-trading

By Peter Sullivan - 11/24/11

Politically vulnerable lawmakers are lining up as co-sponsors of legislation that would ban congressional insider trading.


Congressional Insider Trading Gone Wild

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/congressional-insider-trading-gone-wild

(TylerDurden of zerohedge) Back in May we penned, "Why A Hedge Fund Comprised Of Junior Congressional Democrats Should Outperform The Market By 9%" http://www.zerohedge.com/article/why-hedge-fund-comprised-junior-congressional-democrats-should-outperform-market-9 ...in which the simple conclusion was that insider trading is not only rampant in Congress, but completely unregulated, as it is perfectly legal for Congressional staffers to trade at their leisure on inside information: an exemption which the beta chasing 2 and 20 crowd on Wall Street would sell their first through fifth born to be granted, now that their glaring inability to generate alpha is laid out for all to see.

Tonight we were happy to see that 60 Minutes has finally brought this gross and criminal injustice to the general public, and we expect that Congress will promptly legislate itself into actually complying with laws meant for the mere mortals out there.

That said, we fully commiserate with the pathological excrement that makes up House of Representative these days: it is indeed a sad day when a Congressional member has to rely on honest work to make their millions as opposed to perfectly legal trading on inside information predicated upon laws that these very congress men and women legislate.

Something tells us all the world's banana republics are just staring at the US with sheer and utter amazement as layer after layer of the unprecedented depravity of American society is exposed for all to see.

From 60 Minutes - the part where Nancy Pelosi's face melts is 9:20 in. And speaking of Nancy Pelosi it may be time to revisit: " Moody's Leaked Again: Told Nancy Pelosi Will "Probably Not" Downgrade US Weeks Ago; Did Her Multi-Millionaire Investor Husband Know Too?" and "SEC To Investigate Trades Based On S&P Downgrade Inside Information" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/article/moodys-leaked-again-told-nancy-pelosi-will-probably-not-downgrade-us-weeks-ago-did-her-multi ...We wonder just how deep the SEC investigation has penetrated for it to have generated not even a peep 3 months later.

(Video) '60 Minutes'

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7388130n


CNBC: Congressional Insider Trading

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000057623

(Wed 16 Nov 11 - 10:22 AM ET)

(VideoClip) Peter Schweitzer, author of "Throw Them All Out," discusses the ethics of the House and Senate and the problem of insider trading in the U.S. Congress. He talks about the willingness of the SEC to enforce the rules, given that they have to answer to Congress.


Congress Must IMMEDIATELY Pass HR 1148: The "Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge" Act

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/14/2011

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/congress-must-immediately-pass-hr-682-stop-trading-congressional-knowledge-act

Update: we have learned that the current iteration of HR 682 is HR 1148... http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1148 ...it's purpose is "To prohibit commodities and securities trading based on nonpublic information relating to Congress, to require additional reporting by Members and employees of Congress of securities transactions, and for other purposes" sponsored by Tim Waltz, and as of June 1 was... referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.


10 Comments

10 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by BTKcongress (149) 13 years ago

congress should have their investments solely in blind trusts... where they don't know what they own (so they don't favor particular companies in their legislation) and don't have control (to prevent insider trading).

[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

Credibility Trap: US Congressmen and Their Staffs Regularly Engage In Insider Trading

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2011/11/credibility-trap-us-congressmen-and.html

These dozen Congressmen are just the ones that would brag about it openly to Jack Abramoff.

Trading in insider information amongst the Congress and their staffs is a form of soft bribery that undermines the character of the legislation, and is a relative side dish compared to the huge amounts of lobbying funds being thrown around by corporate special interests. And both parties are in on it to varying degrees.

It can seem an odd corruption to the average person, given the lavish benefits and pensions granted to members of Congress. What is shocking is not that officials sell themselves, but rather, that they sell themselves so brazenly and often for so little. But it makes sense if one understands the attitude of privilege and the insatiable nature of greed.

Corruption of public officials is not news. But when it becomes epidemic, and when powerful interests can use even relatively petty offenses to blackmail representatives, when lobbyists write the legislation designed to reform their industry, and when enormous financial frauds result in show investigations and big talk but no prosecutions, then it is news. And it is a shame and the decline of the rule of law.

::::::::::::Continue Reading Here::::::::::::

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2011/11/credibility-trap-us-congressmen-and.html


[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

Again I have to ask: Is this the best congressional government money can buy?

[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

Congress Must IMMEDIATELY Pass HR 1148: The "Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge" Act

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/14/2011

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/congress-must-immediately-pass-hr-682-stop-trading-congressional-knowledge-act

Update: we have learned that the current iteration of HR 682 is HR 1148... http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1148 ...it's purpose is "To prohibit commodities and securities trading based on nonpublic information relating to Congress, to require additional reporting by Members and employees of Congress of securities transactions, and for other purposes" sponsored by Tim Waltz, and as of June 1 was... referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Following yesterday's 60 Minutes grotesque special which finally exposed to the general public what most experts in the industry have known for many years, namely that the bulk of "profits" for Congressmen (at a fixed $174,000 salary... http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/congresspay.htm ...for the current year) and Senators are made courtesy of perfectly legal insider trading, it is time to ask the logical next question: how is it possible that the US system of checks and balances has failed so spectacularly, as to allow a glaringly illegal activity for everyone else to proceed and to generate multi-million dollar windfalls for congressional and senatorial critters?

Wonder why you have never heard of HR 682, aside from the obvious: that Congress would never vote in a law to cut off this massive illegal form of funding for itself: "This bill never became law." http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-682 ...Well, duh.

More: "This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress. Sessions of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books. Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate under a new number in the next session." Indicatively, the bill died when it was referred to, extremely ironically, the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. So there you have it, and the question now is: who of the 435 members of Congress will be so kind to just say no to perpetuating this gross criminal act, and finally make it illegal for Congressmen to trade on inside information, just as it is for everyone else, and usually ends up leading to prison time and multimillion dollar fines for all those other "mortals" who are caught doing it. After all, is it too much to demand of Congress to follow the laws that are in place for everyone else???

And a letter penned by the original two bill sponsors to Nancy Pelosi. Logically, nothing ever happened afterwards.

Check Out That Letter Here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/72710510/BB-and-Walz-Letter-to-Pelosi-on-Insider-Trading-6-28-10


[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

::::::::Closing the Congressional Insider Trading Loophole::::::::

http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/03/11/closing-the-congressional-insider-trading-loophole/

(An article from 2009 that provides a little more background on all this)

[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 13 years ago

Thanx for this Very Important Post on this VERY IMPORTANT matter ;-)

[-] 2 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

::::::::Meet The Fed's Latest Advisor: Cobra Commander::::::::

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/meet-feds-latest-advisor-cobra

(Tyler Durden of zerohedge) AND you can bet that as an arch criminal, he too is exempt from inisder trading laws...

I've seen predictive programming in television before, but this is ridiculous! I always thought that G.I. Joe was a strange cartoon, and the live action movie was filled with globalist propaganda, but being an economic analyst, this particular episode entitled "Money To Burn" was at the same time hilarious and disturbing. Check it out, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeGTV6fvgaM&feature=player_embedded ...and see if there aren't metaphoric shades of our current financial crisis within. Cobra Commander destroys the U.S. dollar, and then tries to replace it with "Cobra Currency"! (I knew the IMF and the Federal Reserve were working with Cobra...!)

G.I. Joe Cartoon Predicted The Fall Of The Dollar?

(From Alt-Market) http://www.alt-market.com/articles/330-gi-joe-cartoon-predicted-the-fall-of-the-dollar

[-] 0 points by MVSN (768) from Stockton, CA 13 years ago

Nothing new here. And we could scream about this for years and those same people will be repeatedly reelected.

[-] 1 points by WeUsAll (200) 13 years ago

Yep, it's always been like that. No matter what laws are passed, someone is always going to be first in line. Someone better connected than us.