Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Call for Constitutional Amendment

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 7, 2011, 9:18 p.m. EST by Alpaquero (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I'm suggesting that Occupy Wall Street focus its energy on a few issues and I suggest that one of them be a constitutional amendment. Please read the following. I think that the Occupy Wall Street protests are a very good sign. But I think that protests and marches do little to change America. The reasons are many but to name a few: they require a lot of resources, money, time, people, and must be sustained over a long period of time. These are commodities we don’t have a lot of, especially middle class or working people.

I think the rich and powerful have figured out that, with organizations, they can multiply their influence and control over the political process and government. Some of these organizations have very few or no members. Yet, they can wield a lot of influence and inject large amounts of money into the political process. The powerful not only have their individual voting rights, they have organizations designed to win elections, buy political influence, and dictate the outcome of legislation and regulations. These may be legal entities, but they're artificial and are not real people. The rich and powerful want to give these artificial entities as many rights as they can to help them continue their hold on political power in the USA because, in the end, it means more money for them.

Their underlying belief is a total “free-market,” which for them includes the government and the political process. They believe that political influence and power can and should be bought. This concept distorts the democratic principle of one person, one vote and government of the people, by the people, and for the people. The belief of a total “free-market” is a myth, but to explain this would make this a long narrative and the myth explanation will have to wait for some other day.

Middle class and working people generally don’t have the time and resources to organize as well as the rich and powerful. If we want the US government to be of the people, by the people, and for the people, we need to think out of the box. I think the best way to break the power elite’s hold on power is to ratify a constitutional amendment prohibiting the participation of artificial entities, legal or otherwise, in all elections local, state, & national, unless they're registered and disclose all their members’ names and where all their money is coming from. This is the same principle as having individual citizens registering to vote to ensure only legal citizens vote in an election or a politician registering to run for political office.

I’m suggesting a constitutional amendment to guide us only in the political process and something like what I’ve written below:

Government Of the People, By the People, and For The People:

"Only individual human beings shall be allowed to participate freely in local, state, and national government elections. Any and all organized groups of individuals, legal or otherwise, for profit or non-profit (such as companies, corporations, associations, churches, agencies, or other organized artificial entities) are prohibited from participating in any local, state, and national government election, unless they register and disclose all their members’ names and where all their money and resources come from prior to any election."

In summary, these organized groups of individuals (OGOI) must be allowed to participate because individuals have a right to assemble. But they must not dominate our political process at the expense of the rest of the individuals of our nation. The OGOI’s must not have more political rights, power, or influence than individuals in our political process. The main political issue is the rights of real individuals vs. the rights of artificial entities.

As I see it now, our political process has become a multi-billion dollar industry and more corrupt than ever because of the amount of money involved with many artificial entities vying for power, influence, or a piece of the pie. If we want to maintain our democratic principles of one person, one vote and government of the people, by the people, and for the people, we must restrict the influence of artificial entities.

1 Comments

1 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by foolishinjustice (5) 13 years ago

Congratulations from Australia

We like to think that the forms of government in countries such as U.S.A, Australia, Canada, U.K. and various other European nations are democratic. They are not. This is best demonstrated by today's Australian minority government. How many times do governments make improper decisions and the people pay. Greece is a current example. If the people have to pay for bad decisions then they should be the ones who make the decisions. Governments too often treat the public as children who are not able to make their own decisions.

Democracy needs to be relevant to the new era in which we live. Current forms of so called democracy were designed for an era dependent on primitive technology and communications. Today the voting public can have a direct say in every major decision of government.

I propose a form of real democracy:

When political parties run for election they would be required by law to:

Publish an executive summary of each portfolio (government ministry) identifying goals, strategies, key performance indicators (KPIs) with time lines and Budgets.

The Treasury provides equal funding for the campaigns of each party. All parties cannot exceed the same set spending level.

A contract is established between the voting public and the winning party. The party then forms government.

Should the government not meet its KPIs within predetermined time frames and budgets then an online referendum is called to decide if the voting public will continue to allow the governing party to continue. The party has the ability to present it's case prior to the vote being taken. Alternative parties also have the opportunity to present their viewpoint before a vote is taken.

Each voter is given a secure pin number, all voting takes place online. For those without computers they attend upgraded Centrelink facilities (We move millions of dollars each day via pin numbers- certainly secure online voting could be achieved if the will was there to refine the technology). Online voting would provide for comparatively cheap, easy and instant results.

All key policy issues such as immigration, foreign ownership, carbon tax, defence, education, health, government spending and so on would all be put before the voting public as a matter of course rather than be decided upon by government. Each major decision for the country would be truly made by the people and not by the government of the day. Surely this is a greatly superior form of democracy than what we have today.

Thank you for considering my concept.

Foolishinjustice http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk6MeIt-w_Q&noredirect=1