Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Federal Reserve's Once-Secret Loan Crisis Data Compiled by Bloomberg Released to Public -Dec 23, 2011- /// $7.77 Trillion in Secret Federal Reserve Loans to Banks /// Ben Bernanke: "I think that the concerns about the Fed are based on misconceptions"

Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 11, 2011, 7:25 p.m. EST by MonetizingDiscontent (1257)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement


Federal Reserve's Once-Secret Loan Crisis Data Compiled by Bloomberg Released to Public

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-23/fed-s-once-secret-data-compiled-by-bloomberg-released-to-public.html

-Dec 23, 2011-

Bloomberg News today released spreadsheets showing daily borrowing totals for 407 banks and companies that tapped Federal Reserve emergency programs during the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis. It’s the first time such data have been publicly available in this form......


Federal Reserve Secretly Bailing Out Europe

(((CNBC-Video))) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_u8tFqOIarc

-Dec 28th, 2011 | 11:50 AM ET-

A former Federal Reserve official says in the Wall Street Journal that the Federal Reserve is covertly bailing out Europe. Insight with Gerald O'Driscoll, Cato Institute senior fellow, who says the Fed operated a "temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap arrangement."


The Federal Reserve's Covert Bailout of Europe

When is a loan between central banks not a loan? When it is a dollars-for-euros currency swap.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204464404577118682763082876.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

-DECEMBER 28, 2011-

Bloomberg Fires Back At Bernanke's Blustering Rebutall

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/bloomberg-fires-back-bernankes-blustering-rebutall

-12/06/2011-

(TylerDurden) It appears 'It Is On' as Bloomberg offers its well-reasoned and eloquent response to Mr. Bernanke's 'egregious errors' note to Congress. Without naming names, Bernanke makes a number of points regarding the reporting of the secret bailout terms and profiteering, which we discussed here, and now Bloomberg comes 'Over-The-Top' Stallone-style with a much more fine-toothed refutation of Bernanke's refutation of their reporting. "Bloomberg stands by its reporting" and offers a point-by-point take-down of the Fed-head's perspectives....

(((Here is Bernanke's letter to Congress))) http://www.scribd.com/doc/74953881/Bernanke-12-6-11-House-Letter

...and Bloomberg's excellent point-by-point response can be found here, but for a taster, here is Bloomberg's slap in the face of Bernanke's claim that all program details were public:

"Bloomberg’s Nov. 28 story about Fed lending reported that the central bank published regular reports on the scope of borrowings from the discount window and other emergency or temporary programs. The loans were described as “secret” because the amounts, names of borrowers, dates and, often, interest rates weren’t disclosed. The stories reported that the Fed’s rationale for keeping the loans secret was to prevent bank runs."


Bloomberg News Responds to Bernanke Criticism

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-06/bloomberg-news-responds-to-bernanke-criticism.html

-December 6, 2011-

Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks $13 Billion Undisclosed to Congress

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html

By Bob Ivry, Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz - Nov 27, 2011

$7.77 Trillion

....The amount of money the central bank parceled out was surprising even to Gary H. Stern, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 1985 to 2009, who says he “wasn’t aware of the magnitude.” It dwarfed the Treasury Department’s better-known $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

Add up guarantees and lending limits, and the Fed had committed $7.77 trillion as of March 2009 to rescuing the financial system, more than half the value of everything produced in the U.S. that year.....

(((Continue Reading Here))) http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html


Bernanke Says That Any Criticism Of The Federal Reserve Is Based On “Misconceptions”

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/bernanke-says-any-criticism-federal-reserve-based-%E2%80%9Cmisconceptions%E2%80%9D

-11/11/2011-

Nice summary of facts pertaining Federal Reserve's ongoing failures. Michael didn't mention the Fed's unauthorized "mandate" to keep stock prices up. But I guess Bernanke thinks he's done a good job with that. Although why the Fed, or even the government, should be involved with that "free market" manifestation of price discovery is beyond me. (I suppose one could argue that higher stock prices helps saves jobs??) http://ilene.typepad.com/ourfavorites/


Bernanke Says That Any Criticism Of The Federal Reserve Is Based On “Misconceptions”

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/bernanke-says-that-any-criticism-of-the-federal-reserve-is-based-on-misconceptions

Courtesy of Michael Snyder of Economy Collapse -Nov/11/2011-

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is taking his show on the road in at attempt to help Americans feel better about the Federal Reserve. During a visit to the Fort Bliss headquarters of the Army’s 1st Armored Division this week, Bernanke held a town hall meeting during which he took questions from some of the soldiers. Bernanke tried to sound as compassionate as possible as he assured the soldiers that the Federal Reserve is looking out for the American people and is doing everything that it can to help create jobs.

At one point, Bernanke even made the following statement: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/10/us-usa-fed-bernanke-idUSTRE7A96GR20111110 "...For a lot of people, I know, it doesn't feel like the recession ever ended." That probably helped a lot of people feel better. A few probably even had a good cry. But what Bernanke did not explain to the troops is that the Federal Reserve is very much responsible for the fact that unemployment is rampant, for the fact that the U.S. dollar is rapidly being devalued and for the fact that we have accumulated the largest national debt in the history of the world.

Ben Bernanke keeps insisting that the Federal Reserve has two main jobs (fighting inflation and keeping unemployment low) and that it is working incredibly hard to accomplish that dual mandate. During his visit with the soldiers... http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/10/us-usa-fed-bernanke-idUSTRE7A96GR20111110 ...he told them that the Fed is very determined to create more jobs for the American people....

"We at the Federal Reserve have been focusing intently on supporting job creation."

Well, if we are to judge the Federal Reserve by how well it has accomplished its "dual mandate", then the Federal Reserve has been an abysmal failure.

Since the Federal Reserve was created, the U.S. dollar has lost well over 95 percent of its value to inflation.

((( MD: And according to Ben Bernanke, inflation is a -TAX- ))) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4yBrxmEOkY

Is that something Bernanke should be proud of? Of course not. Okay, so the Fed has failed when it comes to keeping inflation under control.

What about jobs? Well, the first decade of this century was the worst decade for job creation that the United States has seen since the Great Depression.

The sad truth is that a total of zero jobs were created last decade. The following is a quote from a recent article in Washington Monthly... http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2010/1003.lynn-longman.html

"If any single number captures the state of the American economy over the last decade, it is zero. That was the net gain in jobs between 1999 and 2009—nada, nil, zip. By painful contrast, from the 1940s through the 1990s, recessions came and went, but no decade ended without at least a 20 percent increase in the number of jobs."

So what kind of a grade should we give the Federal Reserve for the job that it has done? How about a big fat F?

The Federal Reserve has been a failure of epic proportions. It greatly contributed to the Great Depression (even Bernanke admits this), it created the conditions for the financial bubbles that greatly contributed to the financial crisis of 2008, and it has brought us to the verge of yet another gigantic financial crisis.

But Ben Bernanke believes that all of us that are criticizing the Fed are just ignorant. He thinks that we just don't understand the Fed properly. During a recent question and answer session, Bernanke stated the following http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/02/news/economy.../bernanke_occupy_wall_street/index.htm

Ben Bernanke: "I think that the concerns about the Fed are based on misconceptions"

(((Continue Reading the Rest of this article Here))) http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/bernanke-says-any-criticism-federal-reserve-based-%E2%80%9Cmisconceptions%E2%80%9D

17 Comments

17 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by shoozTroll (17632) 13 years ago

I never hear one of those guys step forward and correct our "misconceptions", in clear language.

They remind me of FLAKESnews.

[-] 2 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 13 years ago

The money issuing power should never be alienated from democratically elected government and placed ambiguously into private hands as it is in America in the Federal Reserve System today.

In fact, the bulk of our money supply isn’t created by our government, but by private banks when they make loans. Through the Fed’s fractional reserve process what we use for money is issued as interest-bearing debt.

Our government has the power to issue money (Art.1, Sect.8) and spend it into circulation to promote the general welfare; including for infrastructure, education and health care; not misuse the money system for speculation as banks have historically done. Our lawmakers must now reclaim that power!

[-] 2 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

Yes we are charged with interest on the money they print. That means there is more debt issued than money. Which basically means we are economic slaves in a debt prison. Nice comments, PublicCurrency.

Great Points, and well said.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 13 years ago

According to Margrit Kennedy, a German researcher who has studied this issue extensively, interest now composes 40% of the cost of everything we buy. We don’t see it on the sales slips, but interest is exacted at every stage of production. Suppliers need to take out loans to pay for labor and materials, before they have a product to sell.

http://www.converge.org.nz/evcnz/resources/money.pdf

For government projects, Kennedy found that the average cost of interest is 50%. If the government owned the banks, it could keep the interest and get these projects at half price. That means governments—state and federal—could double the number of projects they could afford, without costing the taxpayers a single penny more than we are paying now.

http://www.mkeever.com/kent.html

This opens up exciting possibilities. Federal and state governments could fund all sorts of things we think we can’t afford now, simply by owning their own banks. They could fund something Franklin D. Roosevelt and Martin Luther King dreamt of—an Economic Bill of Rights.

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/rights.php

[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

hmm, I like the idea of putting the power to print money back into Congress, where they can print the money at - Z e r o - Interest again ...just by cutting out the middle man! (the federal reserve).

Think about this -What kind of government saddles the working people up with the completely unnecessary burden of interest on Trillions of dollars in injections of the money supply, when it can be easily printed, interest-free?

Considering the interest to be paid on such HUGE expansions of the money-supply, just the interest alone, accrued on debt-money is staggering. I wonder how much money that would save working individuals to simply cut a middle man out and make congress take the reigns, where money can be printed -w i t h o u t- interest?

The power of setting monetary policy should be returned to an ELECTED congress. It should never have been placed into the hands of unelected individuals who are appointed. People cannot hold them accountable, because they are insulated.

There would be much fewer spending bills coming through the pike if congress critters knew they were to be held accountable by the voters for the consequences of their misrepresentation and loose/cheap debt-money policies.

-----We Should Make them accountable again. And reinstate Glass Steagall too-----

:::::Too Big to Fail Banking Disaster Predicted since 1999 by Congressman:::::

(((Video))) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2RzRv8yQXQ&feature=player_embedded#!

In a speech on the Floor of the House of Representatives in 1999, Congressman Dingell warns against repealing the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.

He argues that repealing the law would allow banks to become "too big to fail," which would cause instability in financial system. Nonetheless, Congress repealed the law and the nation suffered the tragic consequences of the 2008 financial crisis about a decade later.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 13 years ago

Thank you, check out this site:

http://www.Monetary.org

[-] 0 points by Rico (3027) 13 years ago

See, these are the "misconceptions" laid out plain and simple.

[-] 1 points by Nevada1 (5843) 13 years ago

Good post.

[-] 1 points by MonetizingDiscontent (1257) 13 years ago

Dennis Kucinich: The Fed Grants $7.77 Trillion In Secret Bank Loan - Now Do You Understand Occupy Wall Street?

(((Video))) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVMM5kJGpPs

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), a longtime advocate for reform of the Federal Reserve, is sharply criticizing the Federal Reserve today after Bloomberg news reported that the Federal Reserve secretly committed nearly $8 trillion in support to American and international financial institutions during the 2008 bailout. Kucinich recorded a video for his website before going to the floor of the House of Representatives to call upon Congress to reclaim its Constitution primacy over monetary policy.


[-] 1 points by FedWallFedWellFedUP (183) 13 years ago

Woodrow Wilson regrets over creating FEDERAL RESERVE --- quote "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

[-] 1 points by gmxusa (274) 13 years ago

Ron Lawl and others can criticize the Fed as much as they want. Congress is bought out and will never vote the Fed out.

[-] 1 points by Rico (3027) 13 years ago

Well at least he didn't say "and those who disagree are either trolls or idiots."

[-] 1 points by ramous (765) from Wabash, IN 13 years ago

hang bernanke for his treason

[-] 0 points by Farleymowat (415) 13 years ago

When I was a little kid we were poor and always broke. Lots of kids on a blue collar wage. When mom would say " no we can't afford it," I would say, "can't you just write a check?" this is the Feds idea, print more money. Write a bad check.

[-] 0 points by patriot80 (10) 13 years ago

America....just remember, anyone who criticizes the FED is antisemitic and racist....

Yours Truly,

Abe Foxman