Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: ALERT!! - Stop Internet Takeover - This MUST Not Happen - VIRALIZE!

Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 3, 2011, 8:50 p.m. EST by Leynna (109)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gYZXtiabF24

THIS MUST BE STOPPED! VERY IMPORTANT!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/09/23/senate-must-stop-obama-internet-tak...

Senate Must Stop Obama Internet Takeover By Phil Kerpen Published SEPTEMBER 23, 2011

Today, the Obama administration officially published the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) so-called net neutrality rules in the Federal Register. These rules would undo a decade of free-market, hands-off Internet policy that has made the Internet the greatest engine of economic growth, creativity, and innovation the world has ever seen. They would set us down a path to reducing the Internet into a government-regulated, government-controlled public utility. The effective date is November 20, 2011. The House has already voted to overturn the rules. The Senate now has two months to do the same -- and they must.

A recent Tarrance Group poll found that 74 percent of Americans believe the regulatory burden is too high in this country. Moreover, 65 percent of voters -- and 67 percent of Democrats -- oppose agencies regulating without the approval of Congress. And that is precisely what's going on.

President Barack Obama, infamously promised -- at Google headquarters -- "I will take a back seat to no one in my commitment to net neutrality." He recently bragged about bypassing Congress to get his way, saying: "Until Nancy Pelosi is speaker again, I'd like to work my way around Congress."

Free from regulation, the Internet has been a bright spot in our weak economy, with tech sector unemployment at just 3.3 percent. The net neutrality order will start us down the path to crippling it with regulations. A study from NYU found the rule will destroy between 100,000 and 200,000 jobs.

And the end goal is even more extreme. Robert McChesney, founder of Free Press, a group with deep ties to the Obama administration, the FCC, and the FTC has let slip where the plan leads:

"At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control."

Now comes a clear test for the U.S. Senate. There is no clearer example of outrageous abuse of regulatory power than the FCC's net neutrality order. It came just weeks after an election in which all 95 candidates who campaigned on the issue lost. It implemented a concept already clearly rejected by Congress and by federal courts. And it rewarded special interests, both left-wing ideological groups and companies like Google and IAC/InterActiveCorp that are close to the administration.

The Senate is expected a vote on S.J.Res.6, a Joint Resolution of Disapproval to overturn the net neutrality order. Under the Congressional Review Act, the resolution cannot be filibustered and Harry Reid cannot keep it off of the Senate floor. That means that if just four Democratic senators join all 47 Republicans they can stop this outrageous power grab, and protect the free market Internet -- daring Obama to veto and take full political responsibility. For the sake of jobs, the constitutional principle that Congress writes the laws, and the future of online freedom, let's urge the Senate to do the right thing. Mr. Kerpen is vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity and the author of "Democracy Denied: How Obama is Ignoring You and Bypassing Congress to Radically Transform America - and How to Stop Him" (BenBella Books, October 18, 2011). Chapter 3 is on net neutrality.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/09/23/senate-must-stop-obama-internet-tak...

4 Comments

4 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by TH3W01F (180) from Ottawa, ON 13 years ago

No one owns the net. Don't they get it? We have the tech now to go independent from the net should it become censored. If regulating the internet works, then how come China has such a hard time with it.

As long as there is technology to make servers and ad hoc connections, there will be the net. They are fighting a loosing battle.

[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 13 years ago

This intrigues me. I've wondered for a while about the capability of going independent from the net, as a sort of backup if the net was for some reason inaccessible. I hope you don't think this is a stupid question, but in a nutshell, what would be required to at least get a system "independent-ready?" I'm not as tech savvy as I should be. I want to look into that. Point me in the right direction.

[-] 1 points by TH3W01F (180) from Ottawa, ON 13 years ago

There is no such thing as a stupid question. Only stupid answers.

Ok the backup net wouldn't be as fast as what you got now. That I'd like to point out right away, as we wouldn't have the backbones that the corporates possess. However, to get systems independent from corporates, not that difficult. Here are some links to help you understand how that would work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_networking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network

http://wirelessafrica.meraka.org.za/wiki/index.php/DIY_Mesh_Guide

Combine these concepts with jailbreaked mobile devices, and voila!!

[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 13 years ago

I checked those links. Fascinating stuff. Didn't realize the concept was as developed as it is. If one were to consider themselves "forward-thinking," they would be planning for this eventuality as we speak. I will learn more. Thank you.