Forum Post: A fact that OWS is afraid to admit to.
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 11, 2011, 9 a.m. EST by Rodin
(29)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I recall in my high school and college years the requirement of several classes to perform a group project or presentation. In most cases there was one person who contributed little or nothing to the group but was still part of the group. Sometimes the lack of participation from these people did not affect the grade and through the hard work and determination of the others an A was awarded to the entire group, including the one who did nothing. Other times the lack of participation from these people resulted in an average to poor grade resulting in the entire team GPA being brought down. OWS supports the people who do not contribute.
TROLL
Well now, another troll with some made up story that favors his view. Put a sock in it troll head - byte me
Well this explains some of the idiocy of some of the OWSer's. For the record i was saying that you didn't go to high school.
Judging from the uneducated perspective of the posted comment that you seem to be defending one must wonder where the real idiocy must be. How can one claim to be educated and bullsh*t their opposition to what this movement is about. Sounds Fox News stupid to me. By the way, what makes you think i didnt go to high school like you know me, stick that in your record.
I can't recall OWS supporting anything of the sort.
Can you provide a link?
No link needed, just a statement of fact that OWS is against the producers and feels that just for breathing people have a right to food, housing, and health care. Reaping the benefits of others work.
That has nothing to do with your post.
They have a problem with wallstreet reaping and raping the worth and labor of other.
So do I.
You do not.
You people really need to get in line here. Your Masters have spoken.
[Removed]
Rodin, I understand and agree with your post. Here is the funny part that relates to your post and OWS. OWS wants everyone to participate because the majority is 99%. But, believe in the fake 99% rule then you are not allowed to criticize. You may only participate as a 99% as long as you dont criticize. If you do criticize you are then not a 99% or a 1% but a "troll". So if the OWS math is done, how can there be 99%, 1% and trolls? So I understand the post about contribution.
That is socialism in a nutshell. taking away INDIVIDUAL relevance. And it always seems very appealing to those who just know they are not going to succeed.
There should be threshhold requirements for participation. History Ed. Grammar. Debate skills. Most of the "participants" are barely qualified to beat a drum.
Hasbarabots run the show here, but a few Interlopers catch the odd truth that slips in. That's why I contribute.
Hasbara is a concept "normal" people here aren't familiar with. It takes so many forms. Zionism is the political manifestation of Talmud, most holy book of Jews (most Jews) it’s fair to say. Until we are willing to address the fact that this is a “religious” supremacist movement used from one end to the other by Rothschild et al at the top end of the $ pyramid to dominate and manipulate the rest of the world including those at the bottom end of the "Jewish" pyramid and the entire pyramid scheme is designed to rest directly on the backs of “Goyim” non Jews the world over, we are subdividing the problem only looking at pieces of it, apologizing for the SOURCE. Talmud, it’s adherents, Jewish and non Jewish (I know people who operate by Talmudic principle who have never heard of it) are antithetical to common law principles. If you can agree that the 7 laws of Noah or the Ten Commandments are basically sound in principle, you can also say that Talmud is an 18 volume collection of Rabbinical sophistry designed to circumvent the law for Jews and only Jews. No such thing as "Jew" Things have specific names that represent predictable qualities and quantities. Things like "frisbees(tm)" get special recognition for being representative of a product that is a small plastic flying disc. Frisbees fly in any direction you throw them, with predictable results based on how you throw the disc, and let's say, weather conditions. Frisbees are made from plastic (other things are plastic that aren't frisbees) I could probably list dozens of types of plastic. There are cloth frisbees (flying discs) there are disc golf discs (or "frisbees"-to most observers who don't play frisbee or frisbee golf / disc golf, there is no difference between frisbee golf and any other game of frisbee. There is ultimate frisbee-some type of team frisbee with scoring. How many colors are there of frisbees? How many sizes? How many shapes? They ALL sail through the air gracefully when you throw them properly. Where does the Jew label come in? There is NO predictable set of things a Jew is known to do. All the things they ARE capable of: Infinite list of every kind of positive thing they can do and every kind of negative thing, every kind of imaginary thing. The fiction is self perpetuating...a lie that got started, and rolled out of control. The harder they try to make it all true, the more lies must be told. We have "Jew" as a racial distinction and disagreements as to qualifications within each of those subdivisions. (Sephardic, Ashkenazi, Spinoza, yada yada...) We have "Jew" meaning adherent to a religious doctrine. Within this subset we have orthodox, reform, and others. Why "Jew" is SO diverse and unbounded by qualitative and quantitative meaning that this label can be of no use to us in reasoned discussion. By allowing any discussion to be framed around anything "Jew"ish, it's as though we accept and ratify, sight unseen, tomes of Talmudic Sophistry, every person place thing or act that has ever been attributed to "Jews" since the beginning of written records (including all the fakes). Why start from a lost position? Time to move on to addressing the problems that are being associated with Jews and Israel and make clear distinctions so we can divide and separate the real crimes of commission from the false ideas of pseudo religion/false origin and most especially, the ingrained squeamishness that prevents most people from seeing the problem. The term "Jew" serves to obscure these criminals. It has only the life we give to it. Jew is a fiction-a STRAW MAN. If frisbees started coming off the line that didn't fly-we wouldn't call them frisbees. Why do we afford Jews the same kind of leeway. That label doesn't fit anything. It's pure equivocation. It falls flat-it does NOT fly. I suppose It would be impossible for me to come to this conclusion without the entirety of my experience and education, and without the Jewish label attached to ao many people i have dealt with directly and indirectly. I'm sure we could not have caught the tail of the problem without an overwhelming mountain of evidence. The continuous identity theft and self abusing sophistry is a paper trail like none other. These diverse tribal gangs march to a familiar drumbeat that is inaudible to the rest of us "normal" people. However, by the time we "normal folk" waking as truth seekers, seem able to grasp at the name of this problem, history shows that we may again find the strawman * has a new name, and that we really only have hold of the tail. Forget the name. It's the thing they fear most-irrelevance. Truth. We must identify their codes, their systematic criminal methods. Read the manuals full of hate speech they use to train generations of extremeist supremacist criminals. Talmud is one of these hatefull manuals (Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion is like Talmud for Dummies or Cliffs Notes). Kaballah caballah -another. We lose the game before we even start when we write or speak "Jew" in a thought that is supposed to address concrete crimes they have commited or may be suffering (as a result). The word itsself is subtle poison - toxic in any amount, and lethal in many cases, where people mistook strawmen for humans.
Son, you need help