Forum Post: 7/7 was an inside job,its on the record.The jury decided.No media coverage...surprise.

On 5th November 2007, 7/7 Ripple Effect was released on the internet. It is a 57-minute homemade film produced and narrated under the anonymous pseudonym "Muad'Dib", later named by the BBC as conspiracy theorist John Anthony Hill. The film dismantles the official account of the 7th July 2005 London bombings (also known as 7/7), a terrorist attack on public transport in Central London and was made using footage taken from the BBC. In May and June 2008, Mr Hill sent several copies 7/7 Ripple Effect to the judge and the foreman of a jury at the trial at Kingston Crown Court of people allegedly involved in assisting the 2005 bombings. Mr Hill’s home was raided by police and he was arrested on a charge of "perverting the course of justice". He was really being attacked by a malicious and out of control police-state for getting in the way of their mass-murderous crimes (7/7 was an event of mass-murder). Mr Hill was later jailed for 6 months while awaiting trial. Mr Hill’s trial started on Monday 9th May (2011). On Tuesday a jury were sworn in. On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court. Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources. He went on to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind Jane’s left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the event. As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on record. This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state. It is also clear from the majority verdict, i.e. ten of the 12 jurors that Southwark Crown Court’s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Mr Hill’s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue, or he would have been found guilty (to which he was not). In fact they applauded him and agreed he had done the right thing! You would think that a story this big would be front page news, but unfortunately the British media hasn’t even touched it.

You can watch the full film “7/7 Ripple Effect” on YouTube.

UK Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell sacked for doing his job

A Principal Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police has spoken out about the July 7th '2005 London Bombings. 07/07/2005 In July 2010 he was asked to compile a threat assessment report for South Yorkshire Police.

Tony Farrell 51, who had been South Yorkshire Police’s top analyst for 12 years, is convinced as he can be that the bombings were a false flag attack carried out by intelligence agencies.

He claimed the atrocity was part of a “gigantic, evil conspiracy” to build support for war. His own research lead him to believe the major threat in the UK today is from an "internal tyranny" which the public are slowly finding out about.

He believes the public's reaction to these facts may present a threat of public unrest. He was dismissed from his post last year because his views were considered untenable, but the police officers who sacked him did not disagree with his views!

In fact they seemed to encourage him to appeal the decision. He went to a tribunal for unfair dismissal taking place in September 2011,but lost.