Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: REMINDER: Republicans do not care about about the uninsured

Posted 8 years ago on Nov. 10, 2013, 12:55 p.m. EST by GirlFriday (17435)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Something very dangerous is going on in America: People are taking Republicans’ concern trolling about health care seriously.

Not me LOLGOP, not me! http://www.eclectablog.com/2013/11/reminder-republicans-do-not-care-about-the-uninsured.html



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 8 years ago

more doctors means more procedures to cover the doctors salaries

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Quit your crying. It's been well over a year since you have had the capacity to write anything of substance. You didn't have an argument before. You don't have one now.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 8 years ago

the student loan program is charging me 5,000 this year for being unable to pay

health costs in the US are much higher than other countries

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Which has nothing to do with your first statement. Simply rattling off semi coherent sentences does not help your cause. Try again.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 8 years ago


much like the debates in congress

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Save it.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 8 years ago

has the president stopped killing people in foreign countries?


[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Kiddie script is all you got?

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 8 years ago

suits using each other to take from the poor and give to private insurance companies

[-] -1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

You don't make enough to file taxes, amiright? Or is that a MattLie?
Your care is covered. Kiddie script the best you have?


[-] -1 points by ttimery (7) from Pittsburgh, PA 8 years ago

Ad hominem. Empty. If you aren't interested by the contributions of certain users then just ignore them. This is a forum with various view points. People don't always agree and that's fine. Attacking people using insults is worthless and harms community building. If you care about OWS you should shape up. We aren't children here. Start acting like an adult. There's no need for your baseless trolling.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Blow me. You have to be able to provide a legit argument. If you care about content as much as your pathetic concern trolling claims then you would realize that ID has failed to deliver. But, as we are all aware, you are equally inept in the content bit. Don't want to be treated like a child? Don't act like one.



[-] 0 points by Copiosis (19) 8 years ago

The ACA is better than we had it. Even the authors, however, say it's a bandaid, not a healthcare fix. My healthcare plan (catastrophic with a $4k deductible) sucked at $600 a quarter. It was cancelled. Good riddance. I'm biding my time for the healthcare.gov to get its act together so I can see what my options are.

That being said, the only reason why we have to pay for healthcare in America (or anywhere) is to maintain a system that turns people away from their connectedness to others (Tea Party folks and the Kochs). That said, the Ds aren't doing a whole lot to heal that rift either, as calling the Right names does nothing but prove their point.

Soon (really soon some think) the notion of being left or right will be so passé as to be laughable. I look to the days when were no longer paying for any basic necessities: food, clothing, shelter, education and, yes, healthcare. Only then can we get on with the healing.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

That being said, the only reason why we have to pay for healthcare in America (or anywhere) is to maintain a system that turns people away from their connectedness to others

What the hell???

[-] 1 points by Copiosis (19) 8 years ago

I presume your statement "what the hell" is a colloquial form of "please clarify what you're talking about".

Some of what I'm going to put in this post may seem nonsensical, but that doesn't make it false.

The planet is dominated by a game. We're all players. The game of course is earning a living in market economies in which amoral money is used as a measure and store of value.

Masters of the game (they exist on the right and the left) are exceedingly good at playing by the rules. Which means, they can rewrite the rules in real time, keeping those of us who aren't good at it confused. The majority aren't good at it.

One rule of this game is "keep players confused about their connectedness to each other". The more confused about the fact that human beings are not separate desecrate beings, but instead are conjoined beings living an illusion of separateness, the easier it is for game masters to "win" the game.

This isn't some new-age bull shit. As I said, it may seem nonsensical.

Now, the reason we pay for things, including healthcare is because in the game of "earning a living" everything we need must be paid for. This bullshit. The things we need to live are actually abundant and freely available. But over the top of those things the game as created a patina that makes this truth look false.

What keeps you from accessing all the food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, education you need? Nothing but money. Period.

The way out of this of course is to change the rules or change the game. Since we average people will never master the rules of this game, we must instead change the game. Changing the equates to doing what Buckminster Fuller recommended: offer a better alternative.

My team and I are doing just that.  Copiosis doesn't attempt to wrest the game Masters' control of this current game from them. It also doesn't try to seize their assets, inducing their industrial apparatus and wealth. What it does is so radically change the rules that it completely neuters the assets they control and the wealth they have. Then the new rules compel them to do only things that benefit people and the environment. If they don't comply with the rules, they still keep their wealth and their assets, but they lose all their power as well as their influence over other people (which, by the way, is the main vector through which they exercise that power and influence).

The new rules includes providing all people, at no cost to them, access to basic food, basic clothing, basic shelter, education and healthcare. Period. This is why I say today we pay for healthcare only because we are living a delusion.

The Copiosis Economy doesn't allow anyone to exert control over anybody else period. The only way anyone can create wealth is through acts that in absolute terms are good for people, society and the planet. I'm serious about the neutering effect: in a Copiosis Economy political parties on both sides can't use money to wage anything. This includes the ability to prevent well-meaning people from doing things that restore the environment, innovate technologies that far outperform any fossil fuel (or for that matter any orthodox) technology or create methods to help people like the Koch brothers relieve them selves of the distortions that give them the impression that people can be used for their selfish means.

What happens in today's game is the person who can influence or control money controls what gets done, whether what gets done - or not done - is based on a lie or not. In our innovation, money can't be used this way. So even though the Republicans and may feel that people should earn their healthcare, people who believe it's real can do the work needed to provide healthcare to all at no cost to them.

So, mal-intended people, in Copiosis, are rendered powerless. Period. They get to keep their wealth and their assets, but the assets quickly become useless and their wealth's power is severely restricted.

The real question is, how do we make Copiosis happen? We have a plan. And that plan's gonna work. Watch and see. I beseech you, GirlFriday. Before you criticize what I'm saying here, please look over Copiosis, read the excerpt offered for free at the website, so you understand what you may try to critique. Our innovation is like nothing you have seen before. So critiquing it without understanding the basic tenets will just make you look foolish.

We will need a great many people to overcome the financial power possessed by the master players who would prefer the game remain unchanged. It's doable. We've done it before. We'll do it again. The stakes are high for sure. There is exactly enough time for us to accomplish what we need. The Koch's, the Tea Party, republicans...hell all politicians and the masses brainwashed by them are going to see their world changed....for the better for everybody.

This reply could be interpreted as hubris. If you have that response, I can only say this: watch what happens.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

I'm assuming that you are Mr. G. Are you also our WSmith? In fact, I'll just cut to the chase--do you have any alternate identities on this site?

It doesn't matter if I agree with you or not. I am not going to slam you simply because I disagree with you. Just shoot straight. It's all about integrity.

Then I'll take the time to go through your site.

[-] 1 points by Copiosis (19) 8 years ago

I've been monitoring this site for a little while and understand the reason why you are asking for clarification. I don't know who "Mr. G" is, nor do I know who "WSmith" is. I have no alternate identities on this site to my knowledge. Although I had signed in as a member before, but couldn't sign on for some reason.

I have nothing to hide nor any other ulterior motive. My only concern is uniting humanity, then seeing humanity work together to make the world a better place.

Hopefully, you'll see that my integrity is intact. It is, after all is said and done, the only thing I have that's work a damn.




[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 8 years ago

No they don't and their lies are becoming even more pervasive.

The Koch's and their cohorts DEMAND a good ROI, and we'll never really know how much they spent.


[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Issa another Teathuglican.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 8 years ago

Do you find it strange that just as many more truths about the Koch's, teabagge(R)s and ALEC come forth, there is all this bullshit about duopoly driving all those posts down?

Not word from them about ongoing court stacking by Snyder in Michigan.

It's gotten to the point that they now seem to advocate against defined pensions too.

Whatever they can use as a distraction.


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago


I love how you teathuglicans butcher shit.

[-] -3 points by HCHC4 (-28) 8 years ago

No, not really. I'm pretty sure the people would agree on regulations for certain things. Unless you are like shooz, and think society would turn into absolute chaos if we gave the power back to the people.

Shooz thinks if the people in Detriot controlled the park he mentioned- and then didnt want to discuss- that a neighboring community would charge in like a bunch of savages and take it.

I dont adhere to the kind of outlook. Do you?

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 8 years ago

FUCK YOU, You lying asshole.

Show the quote where I said that.

You're the piece of shit that called the 99% asses!

You're the piece of shit that wants more guns on the street!

You're the piece of shit that posted links from the John Birch Society and Brietbart!

You're the piece of shit that talks about community and ignores his own!

You're the piece of shit that just lied about me again!

You are the savage!



[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Still butchering. I can see how you made an attempt to twist the meaning behind it.


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

You need to run, don't walk, to the library and investigate the nonfiction section. You're a lying teathuglican right wing multiple ID cockroach pr fuck.

And that is all.


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Wait.......whose thread are you on again?

That's what I thought. Now, take your dumb ass to the library.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Same group of shitheads.